Fig. 7From: Transcriptomic comparison sheds new light on regulatory networks for dimorphic flower development in response to photoperiod in Viola prionanthaThe expression of six candidate genes during CH–CL flower development in V. prionantha. (A) Expression of VprGI, VprCO, VprSOC1, VprUFO, VprAP3, and VprPI under 10-h daylight. (B) Expression of the six genes under 12-h daylight. (C) Expression of the six genes under 16-h daylight. (D) Expression variation of the six genes in response to different times of illumination and days after switching from 10-h daylight to 16-h daylight. Gene expression in flower buds around S1 (f1), S2 (f2), S3 (f3), S4 (f4), and S5 (f5) under 10-, 12-, and 16-h daylight (A–C) or equal mixture of f1 and f2 buds under 10, 12, 14, and 16 h of illumination, and 1, 2, 5, 6, and 8 days after the plants switched from 10-h daylight to 16-h daylight (D) evaluated using qRT-PCR. The gene expression in f1 under 10-h daylight was set to 1 in A, B, and C, while gene expression in 10-h illumination was set to 1 in D. Three independent biological samples were used in the analyses. Means and standard errors are presented. Significant differences are presented in Table S24Back to article page