Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of genetic diversity analysis for 15 populations of Angelica dahurica assessed with 12 microsatellite loci

From: Limited genetic diversity and high differentiation in Angelica dahurica resulted from domestication: insights to breeding and conservation

Pop.

Sample size

Alleles

Ap

Na

Ne

Ho

He

I

FIS

Wild (Angelica dahurica)

 BX

24

54

2

4.500

2.469

0.573

0.537

1.039

−0.130

 AS

17

46

1

3.833

2.403

0.590

0.529

0.948

−0.100

 KS

24

41

0

3.417

2.351

0.558

0.532

0.947

−0.051

 CD

24

46

3

3.833

1.922

0.463

0.403

0.760

−0.121

 BJ

24

46

2

3.833

1.966

0.403

0.430

0.810

0.152**

 DH

14

58

3

4.833

2.818

0.605

0.563

1.110

−0.004

 HEB

20

50

2

4.167

2.464

0.470

0.474

0.915

0.090

 Mean

21

49

1.9

4.059

2.342

0.523

0.495

0.933

 

Cultivars

Angelica dahurica cv. ‘Hangbaizhi ‘

  PA

24

43

4

3.583

1.922

0.420

0.395

0.723

−0.011

  GY

24

42

2

3.500

1.968

0.367

0.384

0.730

−0.005

  SN

24

30

0

2.500

1.678

0.232

0.265

0.475

0.372**

 Mean

24

38.3

2

3.194

1.856

0.340

0.348

0.643

 

Angelica dahurica cv. Qibaizhi

  AG

24

39

3

3.250

1.835

0.346

0.340

0.621

0.222**

  CG

21

26

0

2.167

1.511

0.329

0.264

0.426

−0.262

  YZ

24

39

1

3.250

1.623

0.299

0.307

0.567

0.188**

  JN

24

28

0

2.333

1.511

0.249

0.250

0.437

0.118

  ZC

24

36

1

3.000

1.578

0.281

0.288

0.521

0.059

 Mean

23.4

33.6

1

2.800

1.612

0.301

0.290

0.514

 

 Cultivars Mean

23.6

35

1.4

2.948

1.703

0.316

0.312

0.562

 

 Species Mean

22.4

42

1.6

3.467

2.001

0.412

0.397

0.735

 
  1. Note: Ap: number of private alleles; Na: number of observed alleles; Ne: number of effective alleles; I: Shannon’sindex; Ho: observed heterozygosity; He: expected heterozygosity; FIS: inbreeding coefficient
  2. **p < 0.01