Table 1 Effect of Nanophos on bacterial count (CFU) and 16S rDNA gene of soil
From: Impact of nanophos in agriculture to improve functional bacterial community and crop productivity
Soil health parameters | Treatments | 20D | 40D | 60D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total bacterial count | Control | 2.16 × 106 ± 4.04 | 2.20 × 106 ± 3.00 | 2.12 × 106 ± 4.50 |
Nanophos | 2.28 × 106 ± 3.00 | 2.30 × 106 ± 4.50 | 2.31 × 106 ± 5.68 | |
Nitrogen fixing bacteria | Control | 5.40 × 105 ± 5.71 | 5.77 × 105 ± 9.29 | 5.93 × 105 ± 5.03 |
Nanophos | 6.76 × 105 ± 5.29 | 7.06 × 105 ± 4.04 | 7.20 × 105 ± 3.58 | |
Phosphate solubilizers | Control | 8.00 × 105 ± 5.56 | 8.53 × 105 ± 4.72 | 8.60 × 105 ± 3.00 |
Nanophos | 1.00 × 106 ± 3.21 | 1.01 × 106 ± 4.21 | 1.02 × 106 ± 3.21 | |
Potassium solubilizers | Control | 5.20 × 105 ± 3.05 | 5.40 × 105 ± 2.64 | 5.50 × 105 ± 2.00 |
Nanophos | 6.10 × 105 ± 3.60 | 6.33 × 105 ± 4.50 | 6.23 × 105 ± 5.85 | |
16S rDNA abundance | Control | 4.78 × 105 ± 1.29 × 102 | 4.35 × 105 ± 1.30 × 102 | 4.23 × 104 ± 1.14 × 102 |
Nanophos | 6.91 × 106 ± 1.10 × 102 | 3.78 × 106 ± 1.05 × 102 | 1.98 × 107 ± 1.20 × 102 |