Developing an efficient DNA barcoding system to differentiate between Lilium species

BMC Plant Biology

Table 3 Analysis of different barcoding indices of Lilium

	Hd	H	Pi	k	Eta	G+C Ratio (%)	Information site	success rate of sequences
matK	0.94	25	0.2556	96.362	372	30.1-31.3	192	100%
psbA-trnH	0.792	14	0.00250	4.100	22	29.2-32.5	70	100%
trnL-trnF	0.914	24	0.00883	6.137	52	31.9-33.0	14	100%
rbcL	0.814	16	0.00376	2.273	22	43.8-44.1	10	100%
trnS-trnG	0.879	20	0.02245	8.036	57	20.7-22.4	20	97.9%
trnF-ndhJ	0.965	23	0.01652	8.295	49	27.6-29.1	27	93.7%
trnP-psaJ-rpI33	0.880	19	0.10146	34.902	229	28.0-30.6	195	100%
psbB-psbH	0.926	21	0.03035	13.961	268	34.8-36.5	107	100%
ycf1b	0.952	26	0.30907	80.975	270	27.6-32.0	162	100%
ITS	0.995	40	0.05201	31.776	244	58.3-64.0	105	91.6%

Note: haplotype diversity (Hd), number of haplotypes (H), nucleotide diversity (Pi), average number of nucleotide differences (k), total number of mutations (Eta).

ISSN: 1471-2229