Genetic mapping and QTL analysis for peanut smut resistance

BMC Plant Biology

Table 3 Pairwise comparisons between phenotypes carrying different combination of allele (AA-BB) at qSmIA08 and qSmIA02/B02 SNP positions

Pairwise comparison^a	Differences^b	Lower confidence interval	Upper confidence interval	P-value^c
^qSmIA08 AA ^qSmIA02/B02 AA ^{- qSmIA08} BB ^qSmIA02/B02 AA	0.09	−0.01	0.19	0.08
^qSmIA08 AA ^qSmIA02/B02 AA ^{- qSmIA08} AA ^qSmIA02/B02 BB	0.05	−0.04	0.14	0.51
^qSmIA08 AA ^qSmIA02/B02 AA ^{- qSmIA08} BB ^qSmIA02/B02 BB	0.19	0.11	0.28	0.00
^qSmIA08 AA ^qSmIA02/B02 BB ^{- qSmIA08} BB ^qSmIA02/B02 AA	−0.04	−0.14	0.05	0.64
^qSmIA08 BB ^qSmIA02/B02 AA ^{- qSmIA08} BB ^qSmIA02/B02 BB	0.10	0.01	0.20	0.02
^qSmIA08 AA ^qSmIA02/B02 BB ^{- qSmIA08} BB ^qSmIA02/B02 BB	0.15	0.06	0.23	0.00

Results of a Tukey HSD test after ANOVA = Mean Incidence ~ AX-147229403 + AX-147212854. ^cPairwise comparisons were performed for the means of smut incidence of 103 RILs at AX-147229403 and AX-147212854 SNP positions. ^bDifferences were computed between the maximum smut incidence of each group indicated by the QTL name and the genotype. ^cP-value of the Tukey HSD test (α = 0.05)

ISSN: 1471-2229