Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary statistics of MI and other traits among parents and RILs

From: Identification of consistent QTL for time to maturation in Virginia-type Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

  

Parents

RILs

 

variables

Hanoch

Harari

Student t- test

Mean ± SD

Minimum

Maximum

Sig. of A-D testh

2018

MI (%)a

30.9

53.9

< 0.0001

39.2 ± 10.1

13.3

70.9

0.583

 

PY (g)b

2169.4

2274.9

0.7185ns

2142.1 ± 436.1

1037

3610

0.221

 

HI (g.g−1)c

0.5

0.5

0.9794 ns

0.5 ± 0.1

0.2

1.1

0.702

 

50PW (g)d

203.4

229.2

< 0.0001

206.1 ± 12.8

163.5

238.8

0.336

 

50SW (g)e

77.9

87.1

< 0.0001

79.4 ± 4.5

67

89.6

0.003**

 

SP (%)f

70.7

70.9

0.7475 ns

70.7 ± 2.1

61.1

77.6

0.638

2019

MI (%)

44.8

72.1

0.0022

55.6 ± 11.2

28.4

80.2

0.201

 

PY (g)

2760

2813.3

0.8960 ns

2566.5 ± 390.5

1453.3

3716.6

0.118

 

HI (g.g−1)

0.6

0.8

0.0556 ns

0.6 ± 0.1

0.3

1.1

0.002**

 

50PW (g)

178.3

162.6

0.5177 ns

177.3 ± 12.1

145

218.5

0.565

 

50SW (g)

83.3

78.2

0.0098

68.8 ± 3.4

57.6

77.4

0.695

 

SP (%)

71.6

74.1

0.9101 ns

72.6 ± 2.3

65.7

78.4

0.014*

  1. a MI Maturity index; b PY Pod yield; c HI Harvest index; d 50PW 50 pod weight; e 50SW 50 seed weight; f SP Shelling percentage; h significance for normality test by Anderson-darling test; * and ** mean significant at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively