Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons of the leaf phenotypes of the non-transformed plants, OsGRF1OE and mOsGRF1OE as well as OsGIF1RNAi linesa

From: Coordination between GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR1 and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR1 plays a key role in regulating leaf growth in rice

 

Length and width of the first leafb(cm)

Length and width of the second leafb(cm)

Length and width of the third leafb(cm)

Length and width of the fourth leafb(cm)

Non-transformed plantsc

0.54 ± 0.06 (L)

0.11 ± 0.01 (W)

1.51 ± 0.19 (L)

0.21 ± 0.03 (W)

5.03 ± 0.40 (L)

0.51 ± 0.04 (W)

15.00 ± 0.88 (L)

0.81 ± 0.06 (W)

OsGRF1OEc

0.6 ± 0.05 (L)

0.13 ± 0.01 (W)

1.60 ± 0.15 (L)

0.23 ± 0.03 (W)

5.50 ± 0.5 (L)

0.56 ± 0.04 (W)

15.5 ± 0.77 (L)

0.86 ± 0.05 (W)

mOsGRF1OEc

0.91 ± 0.07 (L) *

0.31 ± 0.015 (W) *

3.11 ± 0.22 (L) *

0.40 ± 0.04 (W) *

8.41 ± 0.71 (L) *

0.70 ± 0.06 (W) *

19.02 ± 1.12 (L) *

1.1 ± 0.9 (W) *

OsGIF1RNAic

mOsGRF1OE

×

OsGIF1RNAic

0.33 ± 0.04 (L) *

0.07 ± 0.01 (W) *

0.37 ± 0.05 (L) *

0.08 ± 0.01 (W) *

0.85 ± 0.15 (L) *

0.16 ± 0.02 (W) *

0.91 ± 0.12 (L) *

0.17 ± 0.03 (W) *

3.8 ± 0.35 (L) *

0.41 ± 0.04 (W) *

4.1 ± 0.41 (L) *

0.48 ± 0.04 (W) *

13.20 ± 0.65 (L) *

0.72 ± 0.05 (W) *

13.90 ± 0.81 (L) *

0.81 ± 0.04 (W) *

  1. a Values are n ± SD
  2. b Statistical data are come from 3-week-old seedlings and the width presented to the widest section of leaves. L in brackets indicated the length and W in brackets indicated the width
  3. c Seven plants of each genetic background were analyzed
  4. * Means Significant difference at P < 0.01 compared with the leaf data of non-transformed plants by Student’s t-test (n = 7; means ± SDs)