Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameters in the site analysis, branch and branch-site analyses of PPDK

From: Identification and evolution of C4 photosynthetic pathway genes in plants

Test Used

Foregroud branches

Model

ω

LnL

Estimates of parameters

df

P

Positively selected sites under BEB

Site analysis

–

M0:(one-ratio)

0.1

−34,454.01

ω = 0.095

–

–

–

–

M3:(discrete)

0.11

−32,794.04

p0 = 0.562 ω0 = 0.009

4

0.000 (M0 vs M3)

–

p1 = 0.302 1 = 0.117

p2 = 0.136 ω2 = 0.521

Branch analysis

–

M0

–

−34,454.01

ω = 0.095

–

–

–

–

a

–

− 34,433.04

ω0 = 0.0979 ω1 = 0.0006

1

< 0.0001

–

–

b

–

−34,444.44

ω0 = 0.097 ω1 = 0.024

1

< 0.0001

–

–

c

–

−34,441.56

ω0 = 0.098 ω1 = 0.026

1

< 0.0001

–

–

d

–

−34,453.87

ω0 = 0.095 ω1 = 0.078

1

0.606

–

–

e

–

−34,443.74

ω0 = 0.093 ω1 = 0.284

1

< 0.0001

–

Branch-site analysis

–

M1

–

−33,410.98

p0 = 0.844 p1 = 0.156

–

–

–

a

Model A

–

−33,410.98

p0 = 0.844 p1 = 0.156(p2a + p2b = 0.000)

2

1.0000 (ModelA vs M1)

Prob > 0.6 (257I)

ω2 = 1.000

b

Model A

–

−33,410.98

p0 = 0.844 p1 = 0.156 (p2a + p2b = 0.000)

2

1.0000 (ModelA vs M1)

Prob > 0.6 (337R)

ω2 = 1.000

c

Model A

–

− 33,410.98

p0 = 0.844 p1 = 0.156 (p2a + p2b = 0.000)

2

1.0000 (ModelA vs M1)

Prob > 0.6 (NO)

ω2 = 1.000

d

Model A

–

−33,410.98

p0 = 0.844 p1 = 0.156 (p2a + p2b = 0.000)

2

1.0000 ModelA vs M1)

Prob > 0.6 (NO)

ω2 = 1.000

e

Model A

–

−33,400.15

p0 = 0.810 p1 = 0.147 (p2a + p2b = 0.044)

2

<  0.0001 (ModelA vs M1)

Prob > 0.6 (24 N, 95Aa, 174I, 359A, 459G, 489A, 559Eb, 561G)

ω2 = 3.507

  1. aPosterior probability > 95%
  2. bPosterior probability > 99%