Skip to main content

Table 3 List and chromosomal localization of SNPs significantly associated with resistance to leaf rust

From: Genome-wide association study of leaf rust resistance in Russian spring wheat varieties

Marker SNP ID Chromosomea Position, cM* Alleleb P value MLM-1/MLM-2 R2 c Effect
BS00063175_51 IWB9015 6DL 84.54 G/A 2.02E-05/4.81E-09 0.22–0.27 −3.4
BobWhite_c13435_700 IWB505 6DL 149.85   5.69E-08/9.48E-09 0.32–0.48 −3.90
BS00070856_51 IWB10505 6DL 153.07   2.83E-05/8.3E-06 0.18–0.29 −2.86
GENE-4153_101 IWB33802 6DL 82.14   7.37E-06/1.87E-06 0.20–0.27 −2.96
D_GB5Y7FA02G6KBX_382 IWB18070 6DL 83.75   9.71E-06/1.2E-06 0.22–0.27 −3.18
IAAV8633 IWB35508 6AS 3.43 T/C 1.80E-04/1.58E-07 0.11–0.20 −1.64
BS00037006_51 IWB8079 6АL 83.73 C/A 2.58E-05/2.31E-08 0.09–0.13 −1.52
wsnp_Ex_rep_c69526_68472787 IWA5615 5AS 35.94 T/G 6.05E-06/1.70E-13 0.24–0.27 −3.16
GENE-3321_201 IWB33331 5AS 36.72 A/C 6.05E-06/1.07E-13 0.24–0.27 −3.16
Kukri_c8835_112 IWB48151 5AS 36.58 T/C 6.05E-06/1.07E-13 0.20–0.27 −3.12
BS00094095_51 IWB11853 5AS 36.87 T/C 6.05E-06/1.45E-09 0.22–0.29 −2.48
tplb0023b14_704 IWB74145 1BL 70.07 T/G 2.15E-06/1.45E-09 0.17–0.26 −0.62
wsnp_Ra_c8484_14372815 IWA8082 1BL 69.76 C/T 2.15E-06/1.45E-09 0.17–0.26 −0.62
TA004947–0758 IWB65906 1BL 66.07 C/A 9.28E-06/2.54E-06 0.16–0.22 −0.64
BobWhite_c1456_615 IWB669 1BL 64.89 C/A 1.06E-05/2.04E-06 0.15–0.19 −0.58
RAC875_c8849_134 IWB60932 1BS 62.84 C/T 3.87E-05/9.78E-06 0.07–0.12 −0.31
wsnp_Ku_rep_c71900_71624324 IWA7504 1BS A/G 1.15E-04/5.09E-06 0.08–0.12 −0.16
IAAV2452 IWB34561 1BS 62.63 T/C 3.49E-04/8.40E-06 0.04–0.09 −0.30
Excalibur_c18514_238 IWB23156 2AL 144.13 G/T 3.31E-05/5.68E-07 0.15–0.20 −0.87
Excalibur_c48404_59 IWB26954 2ВL 161.41 T/C 3.79E-05/8.25E-06 0.10–0.13 −0.54
  1. alocalization and marker position on the chromosome are indicated according to the consensus maps of wheat (T. aestivum L.) presented in [30] and Triticeae Toolbox database (https://triticeaetoolbox.org/)
  2. bfavorable alleles are highlighted in bold;
  3. cR2 indicates phenotypic variation explained by the significant locus in different environments