Gene name
| | |
Gene expression patterns in the S2 progeny
|
Frequency (%)b
|
---|
|
S0-Hg2+
|
S1–3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
Inherit. of S1 pat.
|
Rev. to S0 pat.
|
Rev. to mock pat.
|
New pat. (Trans. Memory/others)
|
---|
Tos17A
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
r
|
U
|
U
|
r
|
r
|
r
|
U
|
r
|
U
|
r
|
57.1
|
0.0
|
42.9
|
0.0 (0.0/0.0/)
|
Tos17B
|
U
|
+U
|
++U
|
++U
|
++U
|
++U
|
++U
|
++U
|
++U
|
+U
|
U
|
U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
35.7
|
0.0
|
14.3
|
50.0 (50.0/0.0)
|
SNF-FZ14
|
U
|
+U
|
++U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
r
|
r
|
r
|
++U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
0.0
|
21.4
|
64.3
|
14.3 (14.3/0.0)
|
OsHMA1
|
U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
U
|
+U
|
r
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
+U
|
U
|
r
|
r
|
U
|
28.6
|
50.0
|
21.4
|
0.0 (0.0/0.0)
|
OsHMA2
|
U
|
D
|
+U
|
r
|
r
|
U
|
r
|
r
|
U
|
-D
|
-D
|
-D
|
-D
|
-D
|
-D
|
-D
|
0.0
|
14.3
|
28.6
|
57.1 (0.0/57.1)
|
OsHMA6
|
U
|
+U
|
+U
|
U
|
++U
|
U
|
++U
|
U
|
+U
|
U
|
U
|
++U
|
++U
|
U
|
+U
|
r
|
21.4
|
42.9
|
7.1
|
28.6 (28.6/0.0)
|
OsHMA7
|
U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
+U
|
U
|
+U
|
U
|
U
|
+U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
50.0
|
50.0
|
0.0
|
0.0 (0.0/0.0)
|
OsHMA9
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
U
|
100.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0 (0.0/0.0)
|
Average Freq. (%)a
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
36.6
|
22.3
|
22.3
|
18.8 (11.6/7.2)
|
- Explanation of symbols: U denotes up-regulated gene expression in the S0 plant, and kept the trend in S1–3 and S2 individuals;
- +U denotes further up-regulated gene expression in the S1–3 and kept the trend in S2 individuals;
- ++U denotes further up-regulated gene expression in S2 individuals compared to their S1 progenitor;
- D =denotes down-regulated gene expression in the S1–3 compared to the Mock control;
- -D denotes further down-regulated gene expression in S2 individuals compared to their S1 progenitor;
- r denotes reversal to Mock control expression pattern in the S2 progeny;
- Note: aThe average frequency of the specified pattern in S2 progeny plants. For calculations the two copies of Tos17 were treated separately,
- bRelative band intensities were used to calculate the percent progeny following in either of the four gene expression categories (cf. Fig. 3)