Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistics of final assemblies for this study and published data

From: Comparative transcriptomics identifies patterns of selection in roses

Assembly components

Contig number

Transcript number

Transcript N50

GC content (%)

Total assembled bases

Average length (bp)

Data sources

BTa

86,642

68,612

2099

46.4

92 M

1338

This study

OBa

99,456

81,389

2092

44.2

111 M

1359

This study

OB

na.

80,714

na

na.

36 M

444

Dubois et al. 2012 [18]

OBb

na.

68,565

na.

46.46

61 M

887

Yan et al. 2016 [20]

OB

na

85,663

na

na.

70 M

814

Guo et al. 2017 [26]

OBc

208,039

111,954

1997

45.8

231Mc

1111

Han et al. 2017 [27]

Core set 1 BT vs. OB; 90% identity

na.

10,773

2282

na.

20 M

1863

This study

R. multiflora

78,676

61,864

1907

46.03

75 M

1216

Zhang et al. 2016 [21]

R. jacq cv. gold medal

na.

80,226

na

na.

60 M

743

Gao et al. 2016 [22]

R. roxburghii

na.

106,590

na

na.

37 M

343

Yan et al. 2015 [28]

R. hybrida

93,947

na.

1589

na.

na.

na.

[22]

R. chinensis ‘pallida’

na.

89,614

Na.

na.

38 M

428

Yan et al. 2014 [19]

Rosa transcriptomed

60,944

na.

314

na.

18 M

302

Fei lab

Core set 2 All samples; 80% identity

na.

5959

2326

na.

13 M

2161

This study

  1. aassembly based on data produced from this study; b, assembly based on data from this study and references Yan et al. [20] and Han et al. [27]; c, conceptual confusion in original text; d, data from Fei lab (http://bioinfo.bti.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/rose_454/index.cgi) with transcript N50 and average length recalculated