Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistics of final assemblies for this study and published data

From: Comparative transcriptomics identifies patterns of selection in roses

Assembly components Contig number Transcript number Transcript N50 GC content (%) Total assembled bases Average length (bp) Data sources
BTa 86,642 68,612 2099 46.4 92 M 1338 This study
OBa 99,456 81,389 2092 44.2 111 M 1359 This study
OB na. 80,714 na na. 36 M 444 Dubois et al. 2012 [18]
OBb na. 68,565 na. 46.46 61 M 887 Yan et al. 2016 [20]
OB na 85,663 na na. 70 M 814 Guo et al. 2017 [26]
OBc 208,039 111,954 1997 45.8 231Mc 1111 Han et al. 2017 [27]
Core set 1 BT vs. OB; 90% identity na. 10,773 2282 na. 20 M 1863 This study
R. multiflora 78,676 61,864 1907 46.03 75 M 1216 Zhang et al. 2016 [21]
R. jacq cv. gold medal na. 80,226 na na. 60 M 743 Gao et al. 2016 [22]
R. roxburghii na. 106,590 na na. 37 M 343 Yan et al. 2015 [28]
R. hybrida 93,947 na. 1589 na. na. na. [22]
R. chinensis ‘pallida’ na. 89,614 Na. na. 38 M 428 Yan et al. 2014 [19]
Rosa transcriptomed 60,944 na. 314 na. 18 M 302 Fei lab
Core set 2 All samples; 80% identity na. 5959 2326 na. 13 M 2161 This study
  1. aassembly based on data produced from this study; b, assembly based on data from this study and references Yan et al. [20] and Han et al. [27]; c, conceptual confusion in original text; d, data from Fei lab (http://bioinfo.bti.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/rose_454/index.cgi) with transcript N50 and average length recalculated