Skip to main content

Table 5 QTLs for δ13C under two irrigation regimes

From: Mapping QTLs for water-use efficiency reveals the potential candidate genes involved in regulating the trait in apple under drought stress

Treatment QTLa LGb Interval (cM) Peak position (cM) Marker LOD Variance (%)
Well-watered in 2014 δ13CWW14.LG3 LG3 136.03-143.49 137.63 lm2857 3.70 8.8
δ13CWW14.LG4.1 LG4 29.09-43.13 40.25 lm5833 3.64 8.7
δ13CWW14.LG4.2 LG4 51.03-51.93 51.40 np763 3.03 7.3
δ13CWW14.LG8.1 LG8 17.46-18.68 17.87 lm3625 4.59 10.8
δ13CWW14.LG8.2 LG8 36.54-40.60 39.38 lm1712 4.74 11.1
δ13CWW14.LG8.3 LG8 53.52-58.14 57.68 lm4346 3.64 8.7
δ13CWW14.LG11 LG11 42.36-50.08 45.77 lm1426 3.08 7.4
δ13CWW14.LG14.1 LG14 90.53-95.77 92.58 hk1099 6.10 17.8
δ13CWW14.LG14.2 LG14 109.28-112.46 110.69 lm5786 3.75 11.4
Well-watered in 2015 δ13CWW15.LG2 LG2 13.65-19.89 19.00 np1104 3.15 9.6
δ13CWW15.LG4 LG4 51.03-52.23 51.40 np763 3.05 9.4
δ13CWW15.LG7 LG7 62.20-69.69 67.47 hk2442 5.95 17.4
δ13CWW15.LG8 LG8 38.22-42.49 39.38 lm1712 3.19 9.8
δ13CWW15.LG15.1 LG15 21.54-26.91 25.71 lm2143 6.14 17.9
δ13CWW15.LG16 LG16 165.18-170.8 170.80 hk5 4.28 12.9
Drought-stressed in 2014 δ13CDS14.LG2.1 LG2 88.81-94.89 89.20 lm1741 5.30 11.9
δ13CDS14.LG2.2 LG2 110.37-122.48 112.11 lm5787 3.70 8.5
δ13CDS14.LG5 LG5 35.34-45.77 43.09 np5995 4.00 9.2
δ13CDS14.LG8 LG8 38.22-40.21 39.38 lm1712 3.62 8.3
δ13CDS14.LG10 LG10 36.29-50.51 40.28 lm2441 3.77 8.6
δ13CDS14.LG13 LG13 100.61-104.78 101.42 np2705 3.13 7.2
δ13CDS14.LG15 LG15 140.67-143.58 141.57 np2623 3.29 7.6
δ13CDS14.LG16 LG16 137.6-142.11 139.09 np2691 3.45 7.9
Drought-stressed in 2015 δ13CDS15.LG1 LG1 114.32-117.91 114.92 np1493 3.54 10.8
δ13CDS15.LG2 LG2 23.42-32.31 27.52 np6039 4.20 12.6
δ13CDS15.LG5 LG5 19.31-24.34 21.88 np6056 4.08 12.3
δ13CDS15.LG8.1 LG8 36.95-39.58 39.38 lm1712 4.28 9.8
δ13CDS15.LG8.2 LG8 17.46-28.81 24.67 lm2877 3.38 10.3
δ13CDS15.LG13 LG13 20.56-24.25 22.68 lm4452 3.21 9.8
δ13CDS15.LG15.1 LG15 141.24-142.03 141.57 np2623 4.02 12.1
δ13CDS15.LG15.2 LG15 100.18-103.34 103.24 lm637 3.29 7.6
δ13CDS15.LG16.1 LG16 138.3-144.73 139.09 np2691 4.02 12.1
δ13CDS15.LG16.2 LG16 153.56-155.33 154.71 hk3338 4.79 14.3
  1. a Names of QTLs that were stable between years under the same treatment were shown with boldface. bThe linkage groups of integrated map was used to detect the QTLs