Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality evaluation of RAD-seq data for parents and progeny

From: Mapping QTLs for water-use efficiency reveals the potential candidate genes involved in regulating the trait in apple under drought stress

Sample Clean bases (Gb) Clean reads (M) Q20 (%) Q30 (%) GC content (%) Coverage of genomea(X) Depth of RAD tagsb (X)
Parents Honeycrisp 23.31 76.95 95.38 89.75 37.42 31.41 77.75
  Qinguan 20.15 66.93 93.73 86.91 38.47 27.16 72.24
Progeny Average 1.05 3.50 94.08 87.30 37.64   
  Maximum 3.02 10.07 96.53 91.75 40.14 4.07 23.88
  Minimum 0.52 1.75 92.55 85.00 35.78 0.71 8.76
  Total 357.15 1191.18      
All samples 400.61 1335.06      
  1. a Coverage of genome meant the proportion of total clean bases aligned to apple reference genome accounted for the genome size. The size of apple reference genome was 742.3 Mb estimated by Velasco et al.[35]. bDepth of RAD tags meant the sequencing depth of filtered RAD tags