Skip to main content

Table 2 Expression patterns of CiWRKYs under different abiotic stresses

From: Identification of the WRKY gene family and functional analysis of two genes in Caragana intermedia

Gene name

Drought

Salt

ABA

Cold

High-pH

CiWRKY2

up

N

N

down

up

CiWRKY3–1

up

down

down

N

N

CiWRKY3–2

up

down

N

up

N

CiWRKY6–1

up

down

up

down

N

CiWRKY6–2

up

up

up

up

up

CiWRKY12

up

down

up

down

down

CiWRKY15

down

down

up

up

up

CiWRKY17

up

down

up

down

down

CiWRKY23

up

N

up

N

N

CiWRKY26

up

up

up

up

up

CiWRKY28–1

up

down

up

down

down

CiWRKY28–2

up

N

up

down

N

CiWRKY30

up

down

up

up

up

CiWRKY32–1

N

down

N

N

down

CiWRKY33–1

down

down

down

up

up

CiWRKY36

up

down

up

down

N

CiWRKY40–1

up

up

up

up

up

CiWRKY40–3

up

down

up

up

N

CiWRKY40–4

up

up

up

up

up

CiWRKY41–1

up

N

up

up

up

CiWRKY48

up

down

up

down

down

CiWRKY50

up

down

up

down

up

CiWRKY51

up

down

up

down

up

CiWRKY56

up

down

up

down

down

CiWRKY57

up

down

up

up

N

CiWRKY69–1

down

down

N

up

N

CiWRKY70–1

up

N

up

up

down

CiWRKY75–1

up

up

up

up

up

  1. One-month-old C. intermedia seedlings were subjected to drought, salt, ABA, cold and high-pH treatments, and shoot samples were collected at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 or 48 h. Untreated plants were employed as controls. “Up” indicates up-regulated expression with a minimum 2-fold change compared with the control. “Down” indicates down-regulated expression with a minimum 2-fold change compared with the control. “N” indicates no obvious change detected