Identification of minor effect QTLs for plant architecture related traits using super high density genotyping and large recombinant inbred population in maize (Zea mays)

Wang, Baobao; Liu, Han; Liu, Zhipeng; Dong, Xiaomei; Guo, Jinjie; Li, Wei; Chen, Jing; Gao, Chi; Zhu, Yanbin; Zheng, Xinmei; Chen, Zongliang; Chen, Jian; Song, Weibin; Hauck, Andrew; Lai, Jinsheng

doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1233-5

Table 2 Comparison of detected QTLs between this study and previous studies

From: Identification of minor effect QTLs for plant architecture related traits using super high density genotyping and large recombinant inbred population in maize (Zea mays)

QTL	Chr	Peak^a	Int_Size^b	Overlapped		Reference
QTL	Chr	Peak^a	Int_Size^b	QTL^c	Int^d	Reference
qPH1a	1	91.64	4.98	PLHT1.84w	56	Briggs et al., [51]
				phi001-umc67	129	Gonzalo et al., [12]
				Ph1a	39	Sibov et al., [16]
qPH1b	1	246.21	6.63	PLHT1.129w	25	Briggs et al., [51]
				qPH1b	25	Tang et al., [14]
				umc58-umc161a	88	Gonzalo et al., [12]
qPH2	2	4.86	3.38	bnl8.45a–bnlg381	27	Gonzalo et al., [12]
qPH3a	3	178.02	3.10	umc1167-umc1528	61	Salvi et al., [52]
qPH3a	3	178.02	3.10	q3PH3	4	Ku et al., [53]
qPH3b	3	225.36	3.34	PLHT3.165w	8	Briggs et al., [51]
qPH5	5	62.64	8.31	qPH5a	30	Tang et al., [14]
qPH5	5	62.64	8.31	PH5	115	Samayoa et al., [54]
qPH9	9	146.60	2.91	phi017-csu093	133	Gonzalo et al., [12]
qEH1b	1	91.82	6.98	qEH1a	28	Park et al. [55]
				qEH-ln1b	118	Zheng & Liu, [13]
				qEH1.2	72	Tang et al., [56]
qEH1c	1	245.29	6.55	Qeh	69	Li et al., [57]
qEH2	2	16.82	7.32	bnlg1327-umc61	16	Nikolic et al., [58]
				qEH2–2-1	12	Wei et al., [17]
				qeh2a	8	Lima et al., [59]
qEH3	3	201.28	2.90	qeh3a	11	Lima et al., [59]
qEH3	3	201.28	2.90	qEH3.3	36	Tang et al., [56]
qEH5	5	211.49	1.57	Qqeh5–2	19	Zhang et al., [60]
qEH6	6	93.10	2.52	psr129b-M54/1C	–	Nikolic et al., [58]
qEH6	6	93.10	2.52	Qqeh6	17	Zhang et al., [60]
qEH7	7	130.24	3.59	Eh7b	34	Sibov et al., [16]
qEH8	8	140.23	7.44	EH8	27	Samayoa et al., [54]
qTBN1a	1	267.52	6.35	TBN1.150f	53	Briggs et al., [51]
qTBN1b	1	298.57	2.59	TBN1.196f	13	Briggs et al., [51]
qTBN4	4	218.10	9.72	qTBN4–2	12	Tang Hua et al., [61]
qTBN7	7	109.35	4.39	TBN7.43w	94	Briggs et al., [51]
				umc1695-ra1	107	Upadyayula et al., [11]
				phi034-ra1	93	Upadyayula et al., [15]
qTL6	6	163.42	1.04	U62-bmc1740	–	Upadyayula et al., [11]
qTL6	6	163.42	1.04	dup015-umc62	3	Upadyayula et al., [14]
qULN3a	3	178.17	2.95	umc1167-umc1528	61	Salvi et al., [52]
qULN3b	3	187.67	2.08	umc1167-umc1528	61	Salvi et al., [52]

^aThe physical position of QTL peaks detected in this study, unit: Mb
^bThe physical length of confident intervals for QTLs detected in this study, unit: Mb
^cQTLs identified in previous studies
^dThe physical length of confident intervals for QTLs detected in previous studies. The intervals were calculated according to the physical position of flanking markers, which were got from MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org), unit: Mb

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Plant Biology

Contact us