Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the differentially expressed avocado transcriptsa

From: Transcriptome responses of an ungrafted Phytophthora root rot tolerant avocado (Persea americana) rootstock to flooding and Phytophthora cinnamomi

Comparison FI vs C I vs C F vs C FI vs I F vs I F vs FI
22 h
Up-regulated 1134 4 1010 1057 954 0
Down-regulated 779 0 769 795 814 0
 Ratio 1.46 na 1.31 1.33 1.17 na
r −0.43 0.89 −0.38 −0.39 −0.38 0.90
48 h
Up-regulated 1217 16 1230 1129 0 1200
Down-regulated 1068 10 1000 1047 1 1006
 Ratio 1.14 1.6 1.23 1.08 0 1.19
r −0.55 0.86 −0.55 −0.48 0.90 −0.51
  22 vs 48 h (FI) 22 vs 48 h (I) 22 vs 48 h (C) 22 vs 48 h (F)   
Up-regulated 45 30 0 7   
Down-regulated 25 32 8 11   
 Ratio 1.8 0.94 0 0.64   
r 0.80 0.82 0.90 0.82   
  1. aAny duplicate probes were removed before calculating the number of significantly expressed transcripts. Comparisons are separated into time-points, with the number of up-regulated and down-regulated transcripts (Adj. P-value <0.05, log2fold change >1 or < -1) shown for each comparison. Comparisons between time-points are also shown. The ratio of up-regulated to down-regulated genes is indicated. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) is indicated for each comparison. Flooded and infected (FI), infected (I), flooded (F), and control (C)