Fig. 9From: Comparison of statistical models for nested association mapping in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) through computer simulationsPower of QTL detection 1- β ∗ of joint composite interval mapping model 1 with cofactor selection method 1 for different explained ratio (0, 0.05, 0.15, 0.25) by QTL × genetic background interactions to the total genetic variance at different α ∗ levels in a scenario with 50 QTLs, heritability h 2= 0.8, and 40 backcross nested association mapping (BC-NAM) subpopulations. Colors indicate different explained ratio by QTL × genetic background interactions to the total genetic variance. Vertical lines at each point indicate the standard errorsBack to article page