Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of different explant types and selection methods on transformation frequencies in crambe

From: Regeneration and transformation of Crambe abyssinica

Explant type

Medium

Selection

No. of explants

No. of explants with regenerating shoots

No. of explants with GUS + regenerating shoots

Transformation frequency

Cotyledonary node

A

Shifting

111

17

11

10%

Consistent

116

1

1

1%

B

Shifting

114

16

4

4%

Consistent

110

0

0

0%

Cotyledon

A

Shifting

106

4

4

4%

Consistent

104

1

1

1%

B

Shifting

110

0

0

0%

Consistent

98

0

0

0%

  1. Note: transformation frequencies are calculated as the percentage of explants with GUS + shoots per total number of explants. Selection is on kanamycin; shifting: 10 mg.L-1 → 25 → 10; consistent: 25 continuously.