Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Summary of 454 sequencing results obtained in this study for the American and Chinese chestnut transcriptomes

From: Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection

Sample System # Plates # of Reads # of bp AL of Reads # Contigs AL of All Contigs # Large Contigs AL of Large Contigs
ACCanker GS20 1 129,508 13,080,308 101 7,171 168 247 689
ACHS1 FLX 3/4 126,791 29,828,910 247 11,496 276 885 817
ACHS2 FLX 3/4 162,624 38,165,054 246 9,431 271 691 816
CCCanker GS20 1 235,635 23,799,135 101 14,308 168 436 773
CCMHS FLX 3/4 228,594 56,051,191 246 21,828 344 3,074 851
CCNHS FLX 3/4 259,859 64,271,926 247 28,784 339 4,451 848
Total both 5 2,184,941 428,799,020 198 93.018 261 9,784 799
  1. #, Number; AL, Average length
  2. ACCanker, American chestnut genotype BA69 infected stem (canker) cDNA
  3. CCCanker, Chinese chestnut variety 'Nanking' infected stem (canker) cDNA
  4. CCMHS, Chinese Chestnut variety 'Mahogany' healthy stem cDNA
  5. CCNHS, Chinese Chestnut variety 'Nanking' healthy stem cDNA
  6. ACHS1, American Chestnut Wisneiwski genotype healthy stem cDNA
  7. ACHS2, American Chestnut Watertown genotype healthy stem cDNA