Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of 454 sequencing results obtained in this study for the American and Chinese chestnut transcriptomes

From: Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection

Sample

System

# Plates

# of Reads

# of bp

AL of Reads

# Contigs

AL of All Contigs

# Large Contigs

AL of Large Contigs

ACCanker

GS20

1

129,508

13,080,308

101

7,171

168

247

689

ACHS1

FLX

3/4

126,791

29,828,910

247

11,496

276

885

817

ACHS2

FLX

3/4

162,624

38,165,054

246

9,431

271

691

816

CCCanker

GS20

1

235,635

23,799,135

101

14,308

168

436

773

CCMHS

FLX

3/4

228,594

56,051,191

246

21,828

344

3,074

851

CCNHS

FLX

3/4

259,859

64,271,926

247

28,784

339

4,451

848

Total

both

5

2,184,941

428,799,020

198

93.018

261

9,784

799

  1. #, Number; AL, Average length
  2. ACCanker, American chestnut genotype BA69 infected stem (canker) cDNA
  3. CCCanker, Chinese chestnut variety 'Nanking' infected stem (canker) cDNA
  4. CCMHS, Chinese Chestnut variety 'Mahogany' healthy stem cDNA
  5. CCNHS, Chinese Chestnut variety 'Nanking' healthy stem cDNA
  6. ACHS1, American Chestnut Wisneiwski genotype healthy stem cDNA
  7. ACHS2, American Chestnut Watertown genotype healthy stem cDNA