Skip to main content

Table 3 Homologies of linkage groups among different Eucalyptus sp. mapping studies that employed microsatellite markers. Localization of microsatellites derived and mapped from other Eucalyptus species [17, 44] and candidate genes [17], on the linkage groups of the consensus map of E. grandis and E. urophylla. The EMBRA microsatellites that allowed this analysis are listed in italics between parenthesis.

From: A microsatellite-based consensus linkage map for species of Eucalyptusand a novel set of 230 microsatellite markers for the genus

Linkage groups (this study)

Linkage groups Thamarus et al. [17]

CSIRO Microsatellites Thamarus et al. [17]

Candidate genes Thamarus et al. [17]

Linkage groups Bundock et al. [44]

CRC Microsatellites Bundock et al. [44]

1

7

En006, Eg084, Eg065, Eg134, (EMBRA6)

COMT, SAMS (est), Laccase (est)

-

-

2

4a

Eg008, Eg076, Eg111, Eg086, Eg096

EAP1, PAL

-

-

3

8b

Eg094, Eg098, Eg131

ECS1

-

-

4

11g

Eg128, En011, Eg030

MsaS2

-

-

5

9

(EMBRA5)

AGE2

3

EMCRC4, (EMBRA5), (EMBRA9)

6

6c

Eg015b, Eg062, En016,

EXS2

-

-

7

2d

Eg061, En012, En014

CCOAOMT, ECA1, XET(est)

2

EMCRC9, (EMBRA7)

8

1e

Es076, En013, En015, Eg117, Eg126, En010

 

6

EMCRC8, (EMBRA3)

9

5

Eg067, Eg089, Eg015a, Es140, Eg115

EXS2,

1

EMCRC1, (EMBRA17, EMBRA18)

10

10f

Eg023, Eg091, Es115

CCR

-

-

11

3

Eg099, Eg024, (EMBRA2)

4CL, AGE1, ELF, SAMS (est)

-

-

  1. a Homology was established based on markers Eg086 and Eg096 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
  2. b Homology was established based on markers Eg094 and Eg098 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
  3. c Homology was established based on marker Eg062 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
  4. d Homology was established based on markers En014 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
  5. e Homology was established based on markers En010 and Eg126 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
  6. f Homology was established based on markers Eg091 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
  7. g Homology was established based on the fact that only linkage group 4 of this work and group 11 of Thamarus et al. [17] were left.