Skip to main content

Table 3 Relative efficiencies of methods of gluten analysis for situations where cultivar identification is required

From: Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat

Subject

SDS-PAGE

2-DE

MALDI-TOF-MS

PCR

Required sample amount

40 μg

(Protein)

150 μg

(Protein)

0.04 μg

(Protein)

2 μL

(DNA)

Purity required

Low

High

High

Medium

Number of alleles

19

22

21

16

Alleles efficiently resolved

Glu-B3b and Glu-B3g,

Glu-B3d and Glu-B3i,

Glu-A3e, Glu-A3f, Glu-A3g, Glu-B3b, Glu-B3g, Glu-B3ab, Glu-B3ac, Glu-B3ad, Glu-D3l and Glu-D3m

Glu-A3e, and Glu-A3f; Glu-D3a, Glu-D3b, Glu-D3c, and Glu-D3m

Glu-A3e and Glu-A3f, Glu-B3d and Glu-B3i, Glu-B3f and Glu-B3g

Mass accuracy

Inaccurate

Inaccurate

Accurate

Accurate

pI

Unknown

Known

Unknown

Unknown

Cost of equipment

≈$7,000

≈$30,000

≈$20,000-400,000

≈$5,500

Cost per sample

≈$1.0

≈$70.0

≈$0.3

≈$0.3

Number of samples analysed per day for skilled technician

30-160*

1

100

100

Automation

Not possible

Not possible

Possible

Possible

Experience required

Considerable

Considerable

Less

Less

Safety

High toxicity

High toxicity

Safe

Toxicity

False positives

No

Yes

No

Yes

Accuracy level

++

+++

++

++

  1. *. Thirty samples/day if running two gels. Up to 160 samples/day if using multi-gel (8 gels) buffer tank.