Genetic insights into superior grain number traits: a QTL analysis of wheat-Agropyron cristatum derivative pubing3228

Table 1 Comparative analysis of GNS in Pubing3228/Jing4839 RIL population across different environments

Environment	Years	Parents		GWP		RIL population
Environment	Years	Pubing3228	Jing4839	Pubing3228	Jing4839	Maximum	Minimum	Mean ± SD	Range	CV(%)	Skewness	Kurtosis
E₁	2019	88	32.5	6.44	3.09	95.67	29.5	55.28 ± 12.63	66.17	22.84	0.79	0.62
E₁	2020	87.25	24	6.39	2.28	113	28	59.69 ± 14.76	85	24.73	0.85	1.39
E₂	2020	91.15	26.28	6.68	2.5	84.67	25	53.78 ± 10.30	59.67	19.16	0.28	0.29
E₃	2020	89.34	29.61	6.54	2.81	97	24	58.13 ± 13.09	73	22.53	0.35	-0.08
E₁	2021	92.31	36.07	6.76	3.43	140	22	73.75 ± 22.79	118	31.72	0.57	0.12
E₂	2021	90.06	25.18	6.59	2.4	112	19.67	47.81 ± 12.72	92.33	26.61	0.88	2.59

Note E1, E2, E3 represent environments at Pingdingshan, Yangling, and Xianyang respectively. RIL: Recombinant Inbred Line; SD: Standard Deviation; CV: Coefficient of Variation. Significance levels are indicated with the symbols ‘a’ and ‘b’

ISSN: 1471-2229