Deciphering the possible role of RNA-helicase genes mechanism in response to abiotic stresses in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

Fatahi, Bahareh; Sorkheh, Karim; Sofo, Adriano

doi:10.1186/s12870-024-04893-0

Table 6 Expression of BnRH genes response to abiotic stress in Brassica napus L. var. Hayola #50

From: Deciphering the possible role of RNA-helicase genes mechanism in response to abiotic stresses in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

BnRH gene name	Drought stress						Salt stress								Heat stress
Cultivar Hayola #50
Tissue	leaf			Root			leaf				Root				Leaf					Root
	100	60	30	100	60	30	0	50	100	200	0	50	100	200	0	1	4	6	12	0	1	4	6	12
BnRH#22	1	3.6↑	0.004↓	1	0.02↓	0.7↓	1	0.0007↓	0.1↓	0.2↓	1	0.002↓	0.04↓	4.3↑	1	1.0	0.01↓	0.3	0.3↓	1	0.0003↓	0.0005↓	0.0004↓	0.04↓
BnRH#25	1	2.2↑	0↓	1	0.08↓	0.2↓	1	0.002↓	0.006↓	0.0002↓	1	0.004↓	0.0004↓	7.7↑	1	0.002↓	0.02↓	1.5↑	0.007↓	1	1.3↑	5.2↑	1.2↑	4.8↑
BnRH#26	1	0.04↓	0.8↓	1	0.0006↓	0.005↓	1	1.2↓	0.0002↓	5.7↑	1	6.2↑	7.0↑	8.0↑	1	0.06↓	0.0009↓	0.05	0.2↓	1	4.8↑	4.8↑	1.7↑	0.0002↓
BnRH#33	1	0.004↓	0.5↓	1	0.05↓	0.6↓	1	3.7↑	4.6↑	4.0↑	1	3.9↑	2.8↑	3.9↑	1	0.4↓	0.002↓	0.02↓	0.2↓	1	3.6↑	3.8↑	2.0↑	0.002↓
BnRH#70	1	0.5↓	0.005↓	1	0.1↓	0.06↓	1	0.0002↓	0.003↓	0.0007↓	1	0.0002↓	0.0008↓	1.4↑	1	0.004↓	0.09↓	0.0008↓	0.0004↓	1	1.3↑	4.5↑	8.3↑	0.00002↓
BnRH#79	1	0.002↓	0	1	0.1↓	0.4↓	1	8.0↑	0.003↓	0.05↓	1	0.007↓	0.02↓	1.2↑	1	0.002↓	0.2↓	0.0004↓	0.0006↓	1	1.6↑	4.3↑	1.1↓	0.0003↓
BnRH#81	1	0	0.3↓	1	0	0.3↓	1	0.0003↓	0.004↓	0.001↓	1	0.02↓	0.003↓	6.6↑	1	8.6↑	0.06↓	0.003↓	0.004↓	1	9.1↑	1.4↑	1.1↓	0.04↓
BnRH#113	1	0.003↓	0.4↓	1	0.03↓	0.8↓	1	0.02↓	0.004↓	0.2↓	1	0.0004↓	0.0004↓	0.5	1	0.0002↓	0.02↓	0.002↓	0.008↓	1	2.1↑	3.7↑	8.4↑	3.0↑
		ns	ns		*	**		ns	ns	ns		ns	ns	**		ns	ns	ns	ns		*	**	*	ns
	Cold stress												Cadmium stress
Tissue	Leaf						Root						Leaf					Root
	0	3	6	9	12	24	0	3	6	9	12	24	0	200	400	600	800	0	200	400	600	800
BnRH#22	1	0.01↓	4.0↑	0.002↓	0.003↓	0.0005↓	1	1.03↑	0.03↓	3.0↑	1.6↑	5.0↑	1	0.7↓	0.16↓	0.72↓	0.006↓	1	0.0003↓	0.03↓	0.013↓	0.001↓
BnRH#25	1	0.02↓	1.6↑	8.1↑	0.007↓	0.05↓	1	0.001↓	1.6↑	7.2↑	3.08↑	5.3↑	1	0.13↓	0.04↓	0.07↓	0.00015↓	1	9.0↑	0.1↓	0.11↓	2.4↑
BnRH#26	1	0.06↓	0.0005↓	0.0006↓	0.005↓	0.0006↓	1	3.8↑	3.81↑	4.9↑	1.04↓	3.0↑	1	0.3↓	0.3↓	0.45↓	0.04↓	1	1.4↑	0.02↓	0.02↓	9.9↑
BnRH#33	1	0.007↓	0.002↓	0.0009↓	0.09↓	0.0008↓	1	5.6↑	2.6↑	2.04↑	3.1↑	1.2↓	1	2.6↑	2.4↑	8.1↑	0.02↓	1	6.2↑	1.01	1.5↑	3.9↑
BnRH#70	1	0.0003↓	0.002↓	0.0005↓	0.0003↓	2.1↑	1	1.5↑	8.2↑	6.5↑	3.2↑	0.4↓	1	0.08↓	0.03	0.02↓	0.002↓	1	8.02↑	0.2↓	0.4↓	0.2↓
BnRH#79	1	0.004↓	3.1↑	6.0↑	0.04↓	1.8↑	1	2.3↑	1.6↑	2.1↑	1.1↓	4.5↑	1	0.002↓	1.7↑	0.07↓	0.0003↓	1	0.0099↓	2.3↑	0.07↓	0.7↓
BnRH#81	1	0.02↓	3.3↑	0.0005↓	0.007↓	0.0003↓	1	4.2↑	1.5↑	3.2↑	1.6↑	1.2↓	1	1.7↑	1.5↑	3.0↑	0.002↓	1	3.4↑	1.5↑	1.1↓	0.0002↓
BnRH#113	1	4.4↑	0.006↓	0.005↓	0.002↓	0.002↓	1	0.009↓	0.3↓	1.03	1.6↑	1.0↓	1	0.06↓	0.08↓	0.4↓	0.003↓	1	0.05↓	0.06↓	0.03↓	0.004↓
		ns	*	ns	ns	ns		*	*	**	***	**		ns	ns	ns	ns		*	ns	ns	ns

Rapeseed seedling with fully expanded leaves were treated by abiotic stress including drought for three optimal irrigation regimes (field capacity, FC = 100%), 30 and 60%, saline treatments including 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl, heat stress were subjected to 25± 1°C (control) and 37 ± 1°C (heat stress) and then at intervals of 1, 4, 6, and 12 hours
Cold stress at 4 °C in the cold room, and then at intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h and cadmium stress including 0 (control), 200, 400, 600, and 800 μM cadmium chloride
Number shows the fold change in relative to control
↑the expression is up-regulated
↓the expression is down-regulated
*, ** and ns represent the test significant at p<0.05, p<0.01 and not significant, respectively

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Plant Biology

Contact us