Deciphering the possible role of RNA-helicase genes mechanism in response to abiotic stresses in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

Fatahi, Bahareh; Sorkheh, Karim; Sofo, Adriano

doi:10.1186/s12870-024-04893-0

Table 5 Expression of BnRH genes response to abiotic stress in Brassica napus L. var. Hayola #4815

From: Deciphering the possible role of RNA-helicase genes mechanism in response to abiotic stresses in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

BnRH gene name	Drought stress						Salt stress								Heat stress
Hayolla #4815
Tissue	leaf			Root			leaf				Root				Leaf					Root
	100	60	30	100	60	30	0	50	100	200	0	50	100	200	0	1	4	6	12	0	1	4	6	12
BnRH#22	1	0↓	0.02↓	1	0↓	0↓	1	0.4↓	0.03↓	0.6↓	1	0.6↓	0.01↓	0.12↓	1	0.5↓	0.2↓	0.1	0.08↓	1	0.006↓	0.15↓	0.02	0.0007↓
BnRH#25	1	0.005↓	0.004↓	1	0.2↓	0.15↓	1	0.06↓	0.0003↓	0.0005↓	1	0.6↓	0.004↓	0.5↓	1	0.009↓	0.7↓	2.8↑	0.002↓	1	0.0009↓	0.0006↓	1.2↑	0.03↓
BnRH#26	1	0.9↓	0.4↓	1	0.03↓	0.009↓	1	9.0↑	0.02↓	0.0002↓	1	1.1↓	0.0004↓	4.4↑	1	0.0007↓	0.06↓	0.02↓	0.0004↓	1	6.1↑	0.0005↓	0.0003	0.004↓
BnRH#33	1	0.0006↓	0.009↓	1	0.24↓	0.25↓	1	5.1↑	0.1↓	1.7↑	1	0.0002↓	0.02↓	3.8↑	1	0.0002↓	0.11↓	0.009↓	2.8↑	1	3.4↑	1.6↑	1.4↑	0.03↓
BnRH#70	1	0.02↓	0.02↓	1	0.009↓	0.0002↓	1	5.3↑	3.2↑	4.8↑	1	4.3↑	0.0006↓	8.5↑	1	0.0003↓	0.2↓	0.0008↓	0.002↓	1	7.8↑	0.0004↓	6.5↑	0.02↓
BnRH#79	1	1.7↑	0.03↓	1	0.04↓	0.008↓	1	6.99↑	0.05↓	0.001↓	1	5.2↑	0.0009↓	0.0004↓	1	0.0004↓	0.06↓	0.0004↓	3.6↑	1	5.8↑	0.0004↓	3.3↑	0.05↓
BnRH#81	1	0.006↓	0.03↓	1	0.6↓	0.7↓	1	0.001↓	0.05↓	0.001↓	1	0.001↓	0.008↓	2.9↑	1	0.002↓	0.4↓	0.003↓	4.04↑	1	2.2↑	0.002↓	3.3↑	1.9↑
BnRH#113	1	0.02↓	0.2↓	1	0.001↓	0.02↓	1	0.2↓	3.0↑	0.01↓	1	0.006↓	0.0002↓	0.2↓	1	0.0002↓	0.3↓	0.0007↓	7.5↑	1	2.7↑	3.0↑	9.0↑	0.03↓
		ns	ns		ns	ns		*	ns	ns		ns	ns	*		ns	*	ns	ns		*	ns	*	ns
	Cold stress												Cadmium stress
Tissue	leaf						Root						Leaf					Root
	0	3	6	9	12	24	0	3	6	9	12	24	0	200	400	600	800	0	200	400	600	800
BnRH#22	1	0.11↓	1.5↑	4.7↑	9.3↑	8.3↑	1	1.31↑	1.4	4.3↑	3.2↑	1.1↓	1	0.16↓	0.003↓	0.03↓	0.04↓	1	0.001↓	0.4↓	0.06↓	0.003↓
BnRH#25	1	4.7↑	9.0↑	0.7↓	5.1↑	2.1↑	1	3.8↑	6.9↑	5.2↑	0.05↓	5.1↑	1	3.8↑	0.0003↓	7.9↑	0.08↓	1	2.6↑	9.8↑	0.07↓	0.3↓
BnRH#26	1	2.3↑	0.004	0.0002↓	3.8↑	0.0002	1	7.3↑	3.0↑	5.0↑	0.0002↓	4.8↑	1	0.0003↓	3.3↑	1.14↑	0.6↓	1	1.8↑	6.8↑	0.6↓	0.006↓
BnRH#33	1	7.3↑	2.1↑	0.002↓	3.3↑	5.7↑	1	3.8↑	7.3↑	1.8↑	0.0002↓	1.3↓	1	3.99↑	0.002↓	0.02↓	1.05↓	1	2.05↑	2.09↑	1.8↑	2.5↑
BnRH#70	1	2.0↑	2.0↑	1.6↑	1.5↑	6.0↑	1	7.4↑	6.5↑	1.8↑	0.03↓	2.6↑	1	0.26↓	4.3↑	1.5↑	0.8↓	1	0.008↓	1.6↑	0.4↓	0.2↓
BnRH#79	1	0.002↓	0.0004	3.0↑	0.02↓	1.5↑	1	1.9↑	1.5↑	1.1↓	1.1↓	3.5↑	1	2.4↑	0.011↓	1.9↑	0.05↓	1	2.4↑	1.3↑	0.8↓	0.03↓
BnRH#81	1	7.0↑	6.0↑	5.4↑	1.1↓	4.0↑	1	4.2↑	1.2↓	6.4↑	2.5↑	2.0↑	1	3.0↑	0.0002↓	0.0008↓	1.7↑	1	1.5↑	5.2↑	5.2↑	2.5↑
BnRH#113	1	0.05↓	0.002↓	0.4↓	0.02↓	0.04	1	7.0↑	0.3↓	0.8	0.008↓	0.02	1	1.0↓	0.05↓	0.004↓	0.2↓	1	0.03↓	0.4↓	0.3↓	0.004↓
		*	ns	*	*	*		**	*	**	ns	*		*	ns	ns	*		*	*	ns	ns

Rapeseed seedling with fully expanded leaves were treated by abiotic stress including drought for three optimal irrigation regimes (field capacity, FC = 100%), 30 and 60%, saline treatments including 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl, heat stress were subjected to 25 ± 1 °C (control) and 37 ± 1 °C (heat stress) and then at intervals of 1, 4, 6, and 12 h
Cold stress at 4 °C in the cold room, and then at intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h and cadmium stress including 0 (control), 200, 400, 600, and 800 µM cadmium chloride
Number shows the fold change in relative to control
↑the expression is up-regulated
↓the expression is down-regulated
*, ** and ns represent the test significant at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and not significant, respectively

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Plant Biology

Contact us