Open Access

Molecular characterization and differential expression of cytokinin-responsive type-A response regulators in rice (Oryza sativa)

BMC Plant Biology20066:1

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-6-1

Received: 16 August 2005

Accepted: 13 February 2006

Published: 13 February 2006

Abstract

Background

The response regulators represent the elements of bacterial two-component system and have been characterized from dicot plants like Arabidopsis but little information is available on the monocots, including the cereal crops. The aim of this study was to characterize type-A response regulator genes from rice, and to investigate their expression in various organs as well as in response to different hormones, including cytokinin, and environmental stimuli.

Results

By analysis of the whole genome sequence of rice, we have identified ten genes encoding type-A response regulators based upon their high sequence identity within the receiver domain. The exon-intron organization, intron-phasing as well as chromosomal location of all the RT-PCR amplified rice (Oryza sativa) response regulator (OsRR) genes have been analyzed. The transcripts of OsRR genes could be detected by real-time PCR in all organs of the light- and dark-grown rice seedlings/plants, although there were quantitative differences. The steady-state transcript levels of most of the OsRR genes increased rapidly (within 15 min) on exogenous cytokinin application even in the presence of cycloheximide. Moreover, the expression of the OsRR6 gene was enhanced in rice seedlings exposed to salinity, dehydration and low temperature stress.

Conclusion

Ten type-A response regulator genes identified in rice, the model monocot plant, show overlapping/differential expression patterns in various organs and in response to light. The induction of OsRR genes by cytokinin even in the absence of de novo protein synthesis qualifies them to be primary cytokinin response genes. The induction of OsRR6 in response to different environmental stimuli indicates its role in cross-talk between abiotic stress and cytokinin signaling. These results provide a foundation for further investigations on specific as well as overlapping cellular functions of type-A response regulators in rice.

Background

Cytokinins regulate various plant growth and developmental processes, including cell division, apical dominance, chloroplast biogenesis, leaf senescence, vascular differentiation, photomorphogenic development, shoot differentiation in tissue cultures and anthocyanin production, primarily by altering the expression of diverse genes [1, 2]. The recent genetic and molecular studies in plants have suggested the involvement of two-component sensor-regulator system in cytokinin signal perception and transduction, comprising sensor histidine kinase (HK) proteins, histidine phosphotransfer (HPt) proteins, and effector response regulator (RR) proteins [39]. Such signal transduction systems, once thought to be restricted to prokaryotes, have also been found in many eukaryotes, including yeast, fungi, slime molds and higher plants [10]. In Arabidopsis, proteins with homology to all the elements of two-component system have been identified [7].

The analysis of Arabidopsis genome revealed the existence of 32 putative response regulator genes [7]. Based on the predicted protein domain architecture and amino acid composition, the response regulators have been broadly categorized into three distinct families: type-A, type-B and pseudo-response regulators. The type-A response regulators are relatively small, containing a receiver domain along with small N- and C-terminal extensions [11]. The type-B response regulators comprise a receiver domain fused to the DNA-binding domain and are supposed to be transcriptional regulators [1214]. The pseudo-response regulators share significant sequence similarity with the receiver domain of other response regulators but the invariant D-D-K motif is not present [7]. The pseudo-response regulators are also considered to be the elements of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis and rice [1518].

The type-A response regulator genes in Arabidopsis (type-A ARRs) are rapidly and specifically induced by exogenous cytokinin, although with varying kinetics, and have been characterized as primary cytokinin response genes [11, 19, 20]. The transcription of type-A ARR genes is regulated in part by type-B ARRs [21, 22]. Some of the type-A ARRs perform partially redundant functions, acting as negative regulators of cytokinin responses by a feedback mechanism [21, 23, 24]. In contrast, ARR4 was claimed to be a positive regulator of cytokinin signaling because its over-expression enhanced the cytokinin responsiveness of transgenic Arabidopsis plants [25]. However, the loss-of-function mutant did not reveal a positive role for ARR4 in cytokinin signaling [24] and this discrepancy remains to be resolved. The tissue distribution of ARR4 overlaps to a large extent with that of phytochrome B (phyB) and it has been found to interact with N-terminus of phyB to stabilize its active form [26]. The transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing ARR4 are specifically hypersensitive to red light [26], indicating that ARR4 may be involved in integrating red light and cytokinin signaling.

The type-A response regulators have been isolated and characterized from maize [27, 28]. However, there is no report on the characterization of any type-A response regulator from other monocot species, although several EST/cDNA sequences are available in the databases. Here, we report the identification and analysis of type-A response regulator gene family in rice (Oryza sativa), the model monocot plant. The exon-intron organization, chromosomal distribution and sequence homology have been analyzed for all ten members. The OsRR genes express differentially in various organs examined, and also in response to light. The application of exogenous cytokinin induced OsRR genes in the absence of de novo protein synthesis. Evidence has also been provided for a probable role of OsRR6 in abiotic stress signaling.

Results and discussion

Identification of type-A response regulators in rice

The information on rice genomic sequence [29, 30] provides a powerful tool to identify putative homologous proteins by database searches with genes of known function from other organisms. In an attempt to identify type-A response regulators in rice, the whole rice genome, dynamically translated in all reading frames, was analyzed employing TBLASTN search, using Arabidopsis type-A response regulator proteins as query. This search identified a total of ten genes showing high sequence similarity with the Arabidopsis type-A response regulators. These predicted proteins contain a characteristic receiver domain (harboring conserved D-D-K residues) with short N- and C-terminal extensions and were designated as Oryza sativa response regulator (OsRR) proteins. We amplified (by RT-PCR) and sequenced nine OsRR cDNAs (OsRR9 and 10 could not be amplified specifically since they possess >99% identity within the coding region and flanking sequences). Their sequences were confirmed by comparison with the corresponding genomic sequences. The cDNA sequences have been deposited in the GenBank, and their accession numbers, predicted protein length and genomic locus are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Type-A response regulators in rice.

Gene namea

Accession no.b

ORF Length (bp)c

Polypeptide length (aa)d

No. of intronse

Chromosome no.f

Genomic locusg

Nearest markerh

      

BAC/PAC name

Accession no.

cM position

 

OsRR1

AJ938070

696

231

5

4

P0076O17

BX548156

65.3

E60696S

OsRR2

AJ938071

759

252

5

2

OSJNBb0038F20

AP005808

81.7–83.6

C499

OsRR3

AJ938072

396

131

3

2

OJ1124_D06

AP004043

157.9

C1470

OsRR4

AJ938073

699

232

4

1

P0431G06

AP003683

169.5

S10581

OsRR5

AJ938074

405

134

4

4

OSJNBb0065J09

AL663010

78.2–81.7

C1558S

OsRR6

AJ938075

513

170

1

4

OSJNBb0004A17

AL606652

123.8

R2231

OsRR7

AJ938076

621

206

4

7

OJ1047_A06

AP003802

53.4

C735

OsRR8

AJ938077

366

121

4

8

OJ1705_C03

AP003962

60.1–60.4

E61839S

OsRR9

AJ938078

606

201

4

11

OSJNBa0059J06

AC123526

8.1–8.6

R642A

OsRR10

AJ938078

606

201

4

12

OSJNBb0034E23

AL928752

12.2

R642B

a Systematic designation given to rice type-A response regulator genes. b cDNA Genbank accession number (OsRR9 and 10 has been assigned the same accession number as they could not be amplified specifically). c Length of open reading frame in base pairs. d Length (number of amino acids) of the deduced polypeptide. e Number of introns present within ORF. f Chromosomal localization of OsRR gene. g Name, accession number and approximate cM position of the BAC/PAC clone in which the corresponding OsRR gene is present. h Nearest marker to the OsRR gene.

Exon-intron organization and chromosomal distribution

A comparison of the full-length cDNA sequences (obtained in the present study) with the corresponding genomic DNA sequences (available in the database) showed that the coding sequence of majority of the OsRR genes (6 out of 10) are disrupted by 4 introns (Table 1, Fig. 1A), suggesting their origin from a common ancestral gene with a classical pattern of 5 exons and 4 introns. However, variations in their basic gene structure were observed for other members, implicating gain (OsRR1 and OsRR2) or loss (OsRR3 and OsRR6) of introns. The highly conserved intron phasing and the position of introns with respect to their amino acid sequences (Fig. 1B) also indicate their evolution from the same ancestral gene by exon shuffling [31].
Figure 1

Type-A response regulators in rice. (A) Exon-intron organization of OsRR genes. Exons and introns are represented by black boxes and lines, respectively. (B) Schematic representation of OsRR proteins (aligned with respect to the second conserved Asp (D) residue). The conserved receiver domain is represented as gray box with D-D-K residues. The black vertical bars represent intron position. The numbers 0, 1 and 2 above the vertical bars represent the phase 0, 1 and 2 introns, respectively. (C) Multiple alignments of the OsRR proteins obtained with ClustalX. Fully and partially conserved (present in more than 50% of aligned sequences) residues are highlighted in black and gray boxes, respectively. Gaps (marked with dashes) have been introduced to maximize the alignments. The conserved receiver domain has been underlined. Conserved Asp and Lys residues are marked with asterisks.

The BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) or PAC (phage artificial chromosome) clones carrying the genes for OsRR proteins were identified (Table 1). The chromosome map positions of BAC/PACs given in centiMorgans (cM) from top of the chromosome, and the nearest marker to each OsRR gene are indicated in Table 1. The ten OsRR genes were found to be distributed on 7 of the 12 rice chromosomes (Table 1). Three OsRR genes are present on chromosome 4, two on chromosome 2, and one each on chromosome 1, 7, 8, 11, and 12. The distribution of OsRR genes on rice chromosomes did not reveal evident clusters. However, OsRR9 and OsRR10 are present on the duplicated block between chromosome 11 and 12 [32, 33].

Sequence analysis

The type-A RRs are mainly composed of a receiver domain with short N- and C-terminal extensions [34], essentially similar to the E. coli response regulator (RR) CheY involved in chemotaxis, and lack a typical output domain. All the OsRR proteins also contain the highly conserved Lys and two Asp residues (D-D-K) in the receiver domain (Fig. 1B, C). Pairwise analysis of the full-length OsRR protein sequences indicates that the overall identities range from 28% to 71% (100% between OsRR9 and 10, Table 2). However, the amino acid identity within the receiver domain reaches up to 95%. The receiver domain of type-A RRs in Arabidopsis also showed 60% to 93% identity among them but less than 30% with that of type-B RRs. The predicted amino acid sequences of N- and C-terminal extensions of OsRR proteins are more variable (Fig. 1C), like Arabidopsis RR proteins [11]. The C-terminal extensions of ARR6 and ARR7 were shown to be responsible for their nuclear localization [35]. The rice type-A response regulators, OsRR1, OsRR2, OsRR4, OsRR9 and OsRR10, also possess C-terminal extensions rich in acidic and charged residues (Fig. 1B,C). However, OsRR6 and OsRR7 have N-terminal extensions rich in gly and asp residues (Fig. 1C). These N- and C-terminal variable regions may play a role in their localization to different cellular compartments.
Table 2

Percentage identities among the rice type-A response regulators.

 

OsRR1

OsRR2

OsRR3

OsRR4

OsRR5

OsRR6

OsRR7

OsRR8

OsRR9

OsRR10

OsRR1

-

63.2/53.7

44.4/44.3

33.6/28.6

47.7/47.0

36.1/35.3

29.1/27.7

34.4/38.8

34.8/29.9

34.8/29.9

OsRR2

 

-

43.9/45.0

35.9/32.3

47.7/45.5

40.2/30.6

34.8/26.7

36.6/38.8

38.8/29.4

38.8/29.4

OsRR3

  

-

53.5/55.7

66.7/71.0

64.6/67.9

60.6/62.6

44.8/48.8

51.3/55.0

51.3/55.0

OsRR4

   

-

57.0/56.0

41.5/45.3

32.2/29.1

46.7/44.6

58.1/55.7

58.1/55.7

OsRR5

    

-

67.4/72.4

67.4/68.7

50.0/51.2

54.3/55.2

54.3/55.2

OsRR6

     

-

55.8/53.5

38.5/47.9

42.5/43.5

42.5/43.5

OsRR7

      

-

44.3/43.8

31.8/29.4

31.8/29.4

OsRR8

       

-

43.7/43.8

43.7/43.8

OsRR9

        

-

99.4/100.0

OsRR10

         

-

Values indicate the percentage identity obtained by pairwise comparisons between ORF (left) and protein sequences (right).

To examine the phylogenetic relationships of rice, maize, and Arabidopsis type-A response regulators, an unrooted tree was constructed from alignments of their full-length protein sequences (Fig. 2). The OsRR proteins formed four sister pairs (OsRR1 and 2, OsRR3 and 6, OsRR5 and 7, OsRR9 and 10). This pairing of type-A RRs is consistent with recent evolutionary duplications postulated to have occurred in the rice genome [32, 36]. The type-A response regulators in Arabidopsis also formed five sister pairs and all of them were found to be located on homologous duplicated chromosomal segments [24]. Thus, it is remarkable that the duplication of the sister pairs of type-A response regulator genes is associated with chromosomal block duplications in both rice and Arabidopsis. Recently, the extensive duplication and preferential retention of early auxin-responsive Aux/IAA genes have been reported in both Arabidopsis and rice [37, 38]. The retention of the duplicated type-A response regulator genes in rice (present study) also supports the idea that the genes involved in transcription and signal transduction have been preferentially retained in Arabidopsis [39]. Also, most of the OsRRs clustered together alongwith maize RRs (ZmRRs), in clades distinct from Arabidopsis RRs (ARRs) (Fig. 2). In an earlier study with Arabidopsis RRs, a phylogenetic analysis, including only a few of the monocot RRs, revealed that the type-A ARRs fall into clades distinct from rice and maize [24]. The present study corroborates this observation and strengthens the view that the progenitor of monocots and dicots probably had only a small family of RRs and the expansion occurred subsequently, in both monocots and dicots, by gene duplication.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship among type-A response regulator proteins from rice (OsRR), maize (ZmRR), and Arabidopsis (ARR). The unrooted tree was generated using ClustalX program by neighbor-joining method and visualized by Treeview. Scale bar represents 0.1 amino acid substitution per site.

Organ-specific expression of OsRRgenes

To examine the expression pattern of each OsRR gene in different plant organs, and to assess the effect of light, quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed with total RNA isolated from etiolated seedlings, green seedlings, green shoots, roots, mature leaves, and flowers. The transcripts of all the OsRR genes were detected in various organs examined but they displayed a complex expression pattern (Fig. 3). Most of the OsRR genes were expressed at relatively higher level in mature tissues (leaves and flowers). The expression of OsRR genes was also higher in roots (present study), which is essentially similar to most of the ARRs [11]. The transcript levels of OsRR2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9 were significantly higher in etiolated seedlings as compared to green seedlings (Fig. 3). However, OsRR5 exhibited higher expression in green seedlings. Interestingly, in a recent study, the arr mutants in Arabidopsis exhibited altered red light sensitivity [24]. Also, ARR4 has been found to interact with phytochrome B and stabilize its active form [26]. These results suggest that OsRR genes exhibit overlapping and differential expression patterns, playing predominant roles in specific organs and may also be involved in light signal transduction.
Figure 3

Real-time PCR analysis showing the organ-specific expression profiles of individual OsRR genes. The relative mRNA levels of individual OsRR genes normalized with respect to housekeeping gene, UBQ5, in different tissues (GS, green seedlings; ES, etiolated seedlings; S, green shoots; R, roots; ML, mature leaves; F, flowers) are presented.

OsRRsrepresent primary cytokinin response genes

Cytokinin regulates the expression of a large number of genes including type-A response regulators in Arabidopsis and maize [11, 27, 40]. To study the effect of cytokinin on the transcript levels of individual OsRR genes, the light-grown rice seedlings were treated with exogenous cytokinin for various durations over a 6 h period, and real-time PCR analysis was performed. Consistent with the results reported earlier with Arabidopsis [11], the steady-state transcript levels of OsRR genes were elevated within 15 min of exogenous cytokinin application (Fig. 4). The kinetics of induction with cytokinin was similar for most OsRR genes, with the transcript levels reaching its maximum in 1 h, and declining thereafter. There was, however, no significant change in the transcript abundance of OsRR3 and 8 following cytokinin treatment (Fig. 4). The rapid induction of type-A ARRs by exogenous cytokinin has been shown to mediate a feedback mechanism, which decreases the sensitivity of the plant to the hormone, indicating that type-A RRs act as negative regulators of cytokinin-induced responses [21, 23, 24]. The type-B RRs are the transcription factors that are involved in the transcriptional activation of the type-A response regulators in response to cytokinins [13, 21, 22].
Figure 4

Kinetics of induction of OsRR genes in response to cytokinin. The transcript levels of each OsRR gene in 6-day-old light-grown seedlings treated with BAP for 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h and 6 h, were plotted as the relative expression (fold) of the seedlings mock-treated for the same duration.

Many primary response genes, such as auxin-induced Aux/IAA genes, are induced in the absence of de novo protein synthesis [41]. The genes encoding type-A RRs in Arabidopsis have also been described as the primary cytokinin response genes [11, 42]. To determine whether the OsRR genes also belong to the same category, their induction by cytokinin was examined in the presence of a protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide (Fig. 5). The steady-state transcript levels of most of the OsRR genes increased (up to 2- to 2.5-fold) on treatment with cycloheximide, suggesting that the transcription of these genes is regulated by a short-lived repressor protein. The increase in transcript abundance (up to 4- to 6-fold) of rice Aux/IAA genes examined (OsIAA9, OsIAA13 and OsIAA20) [38] in the same RNA samples (data not shown), confirmed that cycloheximide treatment was biologically effective in our experiments. Further, cycloheximide failed to block the induction of these genes by cytokinin; the transcript levels of OsRR genes were higher in the samples treated with BAP in the presence of cycloheximide as compared to BAP alone (Fig. 5). These results suggest that OsRR genes constitute a class of primary cytokinin response genes.
Figure 5

Expression profiles of the OsRR genes in response to different hormones and cycloheximide. The transcript levels of each OsRR gene in 6-day-old light-grown seedlings treated with IAA, Ebr, GA3, ACC, BAP, CHX and CHX+BAP for 3 h, were plotted as the relative expression (fold) of the seedlings mock-treated for the same duration.

The expression of OsRR genes in response to other plant hormones, including auxin, brassinosteroid, gibberellin and ethylene, was also examined. However, no significant effect of these hormones could be detected on the steady-state transcript levels of OsRR genes (Fig. 5), indicating their role primarily in cytokinin signaling.

Expression of OsRRgenes under stress conditions

It has been claimed earlier that the expression of some of the type-A response regulators in Arabidopsis is induced by different environmental stresses such as drought, salinity and low temperature [43]. To investigate, whether some of the OsRR genes are also involved in stress responses, their expression levels were examined by real-time PCR analysis of the RNA isolated from young rice seedlings subjected to various abiotic stress treatments. The expression of a majority of OsRR genes was not significantly altered under stress (data not shown), with the notable exception of OsRR6. The expression of OsRR6 gene was induced to significant levels by salt, dehydration and low temperature treatments (Fig. 6), and results were reproducible. This indicates that OsRR6 may play an important role in abiotic stress signaling in rice, besides acting as a component in cytokinin signaling. It is noteworthy here that a transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase, AHK1, closely related to cytokinin receptors, is a putative osmosensor in Arabidopsis [44].
Figure 6

Changes in transcript levels of the OsRR6 gene in response to different stress treatments. The transcript levels of OsRR6 gene in 6-day-old light-grown seedlings treated with ABA, NaCl, mannitol and cold for 6 h, were plotted as the relative expression (fold) of the seedlings mock-treated for the same duration.

What are the probable functions of OsRR proteins?

The type-A RRs in Arabidopsis have been shown to act as the negative regulators of cytokinin signaling with partially redundant functions [11, 24]. In addition, some of these ARRs and other elements of the two-component sensor-regulator phosphorelay participate in cross-talk between cytokinin and light signaling (mediated by phytochromes) and also with the gaseous hormone ethylene [4, 45]. The role of one of the type-A RRs, i.e. ARR4, has also been ascribed in red light mediated photomorphogenesis [24, 26]. In fact, ARR4 physically associates with phytochrome B to prolong the stability of its active conformation, Pfr, and accentuates red light signaling. The role of type-B ARRs (and possibly of type-A ARRs) has also been envisaged in a cross-talk between ethylene and cytokinin signaling, although they may regulate these components differentially to control diverse plant processes [4]. To have an inkling about the functions of OsRR genes, the rice Tos17 insertion mutant database [46] providing the phenotype of rice Tos17 retrotransposon insertion mutants [47] was accessed using the BLAST program. We could identify insertion mutants corresponding only to OsRR9/10 gene (NE6006_0_401_1A and ND8005_0_402_1A); it was difficult to demarcate whether the sequence flanking the Tos17 insertion represents OsRR9 or OsRR10 because of more than 99% similarity between them. Despite the fact that OsRR9 and OsRR10 genes are so similar and may function redundantly, the phenotype of the insertion mutants (representing only one of these two loci) showed dwarfism, sterility, lesion mimic and vivipary. It can thus be speculated that OsRR9/10 genes may quantitatively affect different cellular processes influenced by both light and cytokinin. A detailed analysis of the insertional mutants already available and RNAi strategy for the remaining OsRR genes will greatly help in elucidation of the precise role of these genes.

Conclusion

The results of structural analyses of rice type-A RR proteins and their phylogenetic relationship with ARRs will be helpful for their functional validation in rice. The organ-specific differential expression profile of OsRR genes suggests that their products most likely perform diverse and overlapping functions in different cell types of rice. This study also reflects the role of OsRR genes in both light and cytokinin signaling. The induction of OsRR6 by different abiotic stress stimuli provides a molecular link between stress and cytokinin signaling as well. These results provide a foundation for future work on the elucidation of cellular functions of type-A response regulators in rice.

Methods

Sequence analysis

The type-A response regulator genes in rice were identified by performing BLAST searches at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information [48] and TIGR genomic and annotated database [49] resources of rice using the response regulator protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana as query. The number and positions of exons and introns for individual OsRR genes were determined by comparison of the cDNAs with their corresponding genomic DNA sequences. The position of each gene on rice chromosomes was found by BLASTN search in genomic sequences of rice chromosome pseudomolecules available at TIGR (Release 3). Multiple sequence alignments were done using the ClustalX (version 1.83) program [50] and the phylogenetic analysis carried out by neighbor-joining method [51]. The unrooted phylogenetic tree was displayed using the Treeview program. The DNA and protein sequence analyses were performed using Gene Runner program version 3.04. Pairwise comparisons were done with the DNASTAR MegAlign 4.03 package to determine the sequence identities.

Plant material and growth conditions

Rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica var. Pusa Basmati 1) seeds were disinfected with 0.1% HgCl2 solution for 1 h and thoroughly washed with RO (reverse-osmosis) water before soaking overnight in RO water. Seedlings were grown on cotton saturated with RO water, at 28 ± 1°C, either in complete darkness or in a culture room with a daily photoperiodic cycle of 14 h light and 10 h dark. Flowers and mature leaves were collected from rice plants grown in the greenhouse.

Hormone and stress treatments

For cytokinin treatment, 6-day-old light-grown rice seedlings were transferred to a solution of 50 μM benzyl aminopurine (BAP) and harvested at the indicated times. For treatment with other hormones/compounds, 6-day-old light-grown rice seedlings were transferred to beakers containing solutions of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA, 50 μM), epibrassinolide (Ebr, 10 μM), gibberellic acid (GA3, 50 μM), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC, 50 μM), abscisic acid (ABA, 50 μM) and cycloheximide (CHX, 50 μM) and incubated for for 3 h. The mock-treated seedlings for the respective time intervals served as the control.

For salt and drought stress treatments, 6-day-old light-grown rice seedlings were transferred to 250 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol for 6 h. For low temperature treatment, the seedlings were kept at 8 ± 1°C for 6 h. The seedlings kept in water for the same duration, and at 28 ± 1°C, served as control.

RNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). To remove any genomic DNA contamination, the RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For each RNA sample, absorption at 260 nm was measured and RNA concentration calculated as A260 × 40 (μg/mL) × dilution factor. The integrity of RNA samples was monitored by agarose gel elecrophoresis.

cDNA isolation, cloning and sequencing

The coding region of OsRR genes were amplified by RT-PCR, using gene-specific primers, from total RNA isolated from light-grown seedlings using Titan One Tube RT-PCR kit (Roche, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 30 or 35 cycles, the PCR products were examined by gel electrophoresis and EtBr staining. RT-PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) as per manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing was carried out using ABI Prism 377 Sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems, USA), with the Thermosequenase Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Amersham, UK).

Quantitative real-time PCR expression analysis

The transcript levels of type-A OsRR genes in various RNA samples were quantified by real-time PCR analysis employing ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System and software (PE Applied Biosystems, USA) as described previously [52]. Primers were designed by using the primer design software Primer Express 2.0 (PE Applied Biosystems, USA). To ensure that the primers amplify a unique and desired cDNA segment, each pair of primers was checked in the BLAST program in rice genomic sequence available in TIGR database. The primer sequences are listed in Table 3. Primers specific to OsRR9 and 10 could not be designed as more than 99% identity was found in the coding region and flanking sequences. First strand cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcribing 3 μg of total RNA using High Capacity cDNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Diluted cDNA samples were used as template and mixed with 200 nM of each primer and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) for real-time PCR analysis. PCR reactions were performed using the following parameters: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C in 96-well optical reaction plates (Applied Biosystems, USA). The identities of the amplicons and the specificity of the reaction were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and melting curve analysis, respectively. The relative mRNA levels for each of the OsRR genes in different RNA samples were computed with respect to the internal standard, UBQ5, to normalize for variance in the quality of RNA and the amount of input cDNA. At least two different RNA isolations and cDNA syntheses were used for quantification and each cDNA sample subjected to real-time PCR in triplicate. The values presented are the mean of the two biological replicates, each with three technical replicates. The error bars indicate the standard deviation from the mean.
Table 3

Primer sequences used for real time PCR expression analysis.

Gene name

Primer sequence

OsRR1

5'-AGGATCAGCAGATGCATGAATG-3'

 

5'-GAGACGCTGTACGTCCTTGCTT-3'

OsRR2

5'-ACGATCTTCTCAAAGCCATCAAG-3'

 

5'-TGAGAGGCTTAAGGATGAAATCCT-3'

OsRR3

5'-CAGGGTTCGATCTCCTCAAGAG-3'

 

5'-CGAATTCTCCGACGACATTAGC-3'

OsRR4

5'-TCTTCTGAGAATGTGCCTGCAA-3'

 

5'-GCTTGACAGGTTTCAGGAAGAACT-3'

OsRR5

5'-ACCGAATGTGAGCATGATTATCA-3'

 

5'-CCTTGACCTTCTTCAGGAGTTCATA-3'

OsRR6

5'-GTCCCCAACGTCAACATGATC-3'

 

5'-CACGTTCTCCGACGACATGAT-3'

OsRR7

5'-TGCTCAAGAAGATCAAGGAATCG-3'

 

5'-GGCACGTTCTCTGACGACATTAT-3'

OsRR8

5'-CCAGACATGACCGGCTATAACC-3'

 

5'-AAGCAATTACAACCGGGAGATG-3'

OsRR9/10

5'-TCATGAGGACAGCCCAATTTCTA-3'

 

5'-TGCAGTAGTCTGTGATGATCAGGTT-3'

UBQ5

5'-ACCACTTCGACCGCCACTACT-3'

 

5'-ACGCCTAAGCCTGCTGGTT-3'

Declarations

Acknowledgements

MJ acknowledges the award of Senior Research Fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, and the University Grants Commission, New Delhi.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Interdisciplinary Centre for Plant Genomics and Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus

References

  1. Mok DW, Mok MC: Cytokinin Metabolism and Action. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001, 52: 89-118. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Davies PJ: Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal transduction, Action. 2004, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Kakimoto T: Perception and signal transduction of cytokinins. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003, 54: 605-627. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134802.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Oka A, Sakai H, Iwakoshi S: His-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction in higher plants: receptors and response regulators for cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Genet Syst. 2002, 77: 383-391. 10.1266/ggs.77.383.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutchison CE, Kieber JJ: Cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2002, S47-59. Suppl 14
  6. Lohrmann J, Harter K: Plant two-component signaling systems and the role of response regulators. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128: 363-369. 10.1104/pp.128.2.363.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hwang I, Chen HC, Sheen J: Two-component signal transduction pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129: 500-515. 10.1104/pp.005504.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Heyl A, Schmulling T: Cytokinin signal perception and transduction. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003, 6: 480-488. 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00087-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Grefen C, Harter K: Plant two-component systems: principles, functions, complexity and cross talk. Planta. 2004, 219: 733-742. 10.1007/s00425-004-1316-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN: Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000, 69: 183-215. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.183.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. D'Agostino IB, Deruere J, Kieber JJ: Characterization of the response of the Arabidopsis response regulator gene family to cytokinin. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124: 1706-1717. 10.1104/pp.124.4.1706.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sakai H, Aoyama T, Bono H, Oka A: Two-component response regulators from Arabidopsis thaliana contain a putative DNA-binding motif. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998, 39: 1232-1239.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sakai H, Aoyama T, Oka A: Arabidopsis ARR1 and ARR2 response regulators operate as transcriptional activators. Plant J. 2000, 24: 703-711. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00909.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mason MG, Li J, Mathews DE, Kieber JJ, Schaller GE: Type-B response regulators display overlapping expression patterns in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 927-937. 10.1104/pp.103.038109.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Makino S, Kiba T, Imamura A, Hanaki N, Nakamura A, Suzuki T, Taniguchi M, Ueguchi C, Sugiyama T, Mizuno T: Genes encoding pseudo-response regulators: insight into His-to-Asp phosphorelay and circadian rhythm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41: 791-803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Makino S, Matsushika A, Kojima M, Yamashino T, Mizuno T: The APRR1/TOC1 quintet implicated in circadian rhythms of Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Characterization with APRR1-overexpressing plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43: 58-69. 10.1093/pcp/pcf005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsushika A, Makino S, Kojima M, Yamashino T, Mizuno T: The APRR1/TOC1 quintet implicated in circadian rhythms of Arabidopsis thaliana: II. Characterization with CCA1-overexpressing plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43: 118-122. 10.1093/pcp/pcf006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Murakami M, Ashikari M, Miura K, Yamashino T, Mizuno T: The evolutionarily conserved OsPRR quintet: rice pseudo-response regulators implicated in circadian rhythm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44: 1229-1236. 10.1093/pcp/pcg135.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Taniguchi M, Kiba T, Sakakibara H, Ueguchi C, Mizuno T, Sugiyama T: Expression of Arabidopsis response regulator homologs is induced by cytokinins and nitrate. FEBS Lett. 1998, 429: 259-262. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00611-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiba T, Taniguchi M, Imamura A, Ueguchi C, Mizuno T, Sugiyama T: Differential expression of genes for response regulators in response to cytokinins and nitrate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40: 767-771.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hwang I, Sheen J: Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature. 2001, 413: 383-389. 10.1038/35096500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sakai H, Honma T, Aoyama T, Sato S, Kato T, Tabata S, Oka A: ARR1, a transcription factor for genes immediately responsive to cytokinins. Science. 2001, 294: 1519-1521. 10.1126/science.1065201.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiba T, Yamada H, Sato S, Kato T, Tabata S, Yamashino T, Mizuno T: The type-A response regulator, ARR15, acts as a negative regulator in the cytokinin-mediated signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44: 868-874. 10.1093/pcp/pcg108.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. To JP, Haberer G, Ferreira FJ, Deruere J, Mason MG, Schaller GE, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Kieber JJ: Type-A Arabidopsis response regulators are partially redundant negative regulators of cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 658-671. 10.1105/tpc.018978.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Osakabe Y, Miyata S, Urao T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Shinozaki KY: Overexpression of Arabidopsis response regulators, ARR4/ATRR1/IBC7 and ARR8/ATRR3, alters cytokinin responses differentially in the shoot and in callus formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 293: 806-815. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00286-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sweere U, Eichenberg K, Lohrmann J, Mira-Rodado V, Baurle I, Kudla J, Nagy F, Schafer E, Harter K: Interaction of the response regulator ARR4 with phytochrome B in modulating red light signaling. Science. 2001, 294: 1108-1111. 10.1126/science.1065022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Asakura Y, Hagino T, Ohta Y, Aoki K, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Deji A, Yamaya T, Sugiyama T, Sakakibara H: Molecular characterization of His-Asp phosphorelay signaling factors in maize leaves: implications of the signal divergence by cytokinin-inducible response regulators in the cytosol and the nuclei. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 52: 331-341. 10.1023/A:1023971315108.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Giulini A, Wang J, Jackson D: Control of phyllotaxy by the cytokinin-inducible response regulator homologue ABPHYL1. Nature. 2004, 430: 1031-1034. 10.1038/nature02778.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, Glazebrook J, Sessions A, Oeller P, Varma H, Hadley D, Hutchison D, Martin C, Katagiri F, Lange BM, Moughamer T, Xia Y, Budworth P, Zhong J, Miguel T, Paszkowski U, Zhang S, Colbert M, Sun WL, Chen L, Cooper B, Park S, Wood TC, Mao L, Quail P, Wing R, Dean R, Yu Y, Zharkikh A, Shen R, Sahasrabudhe S, Thomas A, Cannings R, Gutin A, Pruss D, Reid J, Tavtigian S, Mitchell J, Eldredge G, Scholl T, Miller RM, Bhatnagar S, Adey N, Rubano T, Tusneem N, Robinson R, Feldhaus J, Macalma T, Oliphant A, Briggs S: A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science. 2002, 296: 92-100. 10.1126/science.1068275.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GK, Li S, Liu B, Deng Y, Dai L, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Cao M, Liu J, Sun J, Tang J, Chen Y, Huang X, Lin W, Ye C, Tong W, Cong L, Geng J, Han Y, Li L, Li W, Hu G, Huang X, Li W, Li J, Liu Z, Li L, Liu J, Qi Q, Liu J, Li L, Li T, Wang X, Lu H, Wu T, Zhu M, Ni P, Han H, Dong W, Ren X, Feng X, Cui P, Li X, Wang H, Xu X, Zhai W, Xu Z, Zhang J, He S, Zhang J, Xu J, Zhang K, Zheng X, Dong J, Zeng W, Tao L, Ye J, Tan J, Ren X, Chen X, He J, Liu D, Tian W, Tian C, Xia H, Bao Q, Li G, Gao H, Cao T, Wang J, Zhao W, Li P, Chen W, Wang X, Zhang Y, Hu J, Wang J, Liu S, Yang J, Zhang G, Xiong Y, Li Z, Mao L, Zhou C, Zhu Z, Chen R, Hao B, Zheng W, Chen S, Guo W, Li G, Liu S, Tao M, Wang J, Zhu L, Yuan L, Yang H: A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science. 2002, 296: 79-92. 10.1126/science.1068037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolkman JA, Stemmer WPC: Directed evolution of proteins by exon shuffling. Nature Biotech. 2001, 19: 423-428. 10.1038/88084.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA: Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9903-9908. 10.1073/pnas.0307901101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. The Rice Chromosomes 11 and 12 Sequencing Consortia: The sequence of rice chromosomes 11 and 12, rich in disease resistance genes and recent duplications. BMC Biology. 2005, 3: 20-10.1186/1741-7007-3-20.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Imamura A, Hanaki N, Umeda H, Nakamura A, Suzuki T, Ueguchi C, Mizuno T: Response regulators implicated in His-to-Asp phosphotransfer signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 2691-2696. 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2691.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Imamura A, Yoshino Y, Mizuno T: Cellular localization of the signaling components of Arabidopsis His-to-Asp phosphorelay. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2001, 65: 2113-2117. 10.1271/bbb.65.2113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project: The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature. 2005, 436: 793-800. 10.1038/nature03895.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Remington DL, Vision TJ, Guilfoyle TJ, Reed JW: Contrasting modes of diversification in the Aux/IAA and ARF gene families. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 1738-1752. 10.1104/pp.104.039669.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Jain M, Kaur N, Garg R, Thakur JK, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP: Structure and expression analysis of early auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct Integr Genomics. 2006, 6: 47-59. 10.1007/s10142-005-0005-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Blanc G, Wolfe KH: Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 1679-1691. 10.1105/tpc.021410.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Rashotte AM, Carson SDB, To JPC, Kieber JJ: Expression profiling of cytokinin action in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132: 1998-2011. 10.1104/pp.103.021436.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Abel S, Nguyen MD, Theologis A: The PS-IAA4/5-like family of early auxin-inducible mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Mol Biol. 1995, 251: 533-549. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0454.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Brandstatter I, Kieber JJ: Two genes with similarity to bacterial response regulators are rapidly and specifically induced by cytokinin in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998, 10: 1009-1019. 10.1105/tpc.10.6.1009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Urao T, Yakubov B, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K: Stress-responsive expression of genes for two-component response regulator-like proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 1998, 427: 175-178. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00418-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Urao T, Yakubov B, Satoh R, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M, Hiryama T, Shinozaki K: A transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 1743-1754. 10.1105/tpc.11.9.1743.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Halliday KJ, Fankhauser C: Phytochrome-hormonal signalling networks. New Phytol. 2003, 157: 449-463. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00689.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Rice Tos17 Insertion Mutant Database. [http://tos.nias.affrc.go.jp/]
  47. Miyao A, Tanaka K, Murata K, Sawaki H, Takeda S, Abe K, Shinozuka Y, Onosato K, Hirochika H: Target site specificity of the Tos17 retrotransposon shows a preference for insertion within genes and against insertion in retrotransposon-rich regions of the genome. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 1771-1780. 10.1105/tpc.012559.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. National Centre for Biotechnology Information. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
  49. TIGR Rice Genome Annotation. [http://tigrblast.tigr.org/euk-blast]
  50. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jain M, Kaur N, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP: The auxin-responsive GH3 gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct Integr Genomics. 2006, 6: 36-46. 10.1007/s10142-005-0142-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.