Open Access

Characterization of the multigene family TaHKT 2;1 in bread wheat and the role of gene members in plant Na+ and K+status

  • HA Chandima K Ariyarathna1, 2,
  • Tanveer Ul-Haq1, 2, 3,
  • Timothy D Colmer1 and
  • Michael G Francki2, 4Email author
BMC Plant Biology201414:159

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-159

Received: 2 April 2014

Accepted: 4 June 2014

Published: 11 June 2014

Abstract

Background

A member of the TaHKT2;1 multigene family was previously identified as a Na+ transporter with a possible role in root Na+ uptake. In the present study, the existing full-length cDNA of this member was used as a basis to query the International Wheat Genome Survey Sequence to identify all members of the TaHKT2;1 family. Individual TaHKT2;1 genes were subsequently studied for gene and predicted protein structures, promoter variability, tissue expression and their role in Na+ and K+ status of wheat.

Results

Six TaHKT2;1 genes were characterized which included four functional genes (TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, TaHKT2;1 7BL-1, TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1) and two pseudogenes (TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3), on chromosomes 7A, 7B and 7D of hexaploid wheat. Variability in protein domains for cation specificity and in cis-regulatory elements for salt response in gene promoters, were identified amongst the functional TaHKT2;1 members. The functional genes were expressed under low and high NaCl conditions in roots and leaf sheaths, but were down regulated in leaf blades. Alternative splicing events were evident in TaHKT2;1 7AL-1. Aneuploid lines null for each functional gene were grown in high NaCl nutrient solution culture to identify potential role of each TaHKT2;1 member. Aneuploid lines null for TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 showed no difference in Na+ concentration between Chinese Spring except for higher Na+ in sheaths. The same aneuploid lines had lower K+ in roots, sheath and youngest fully expanded leaf but only under high (200 mM) NaCl in the external solution. There was no difference in Na+ or K+ concentration for any treatment between aneuploid line null for the TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 gene and Chinese Spring.

Conclusions

TaHKT2;1 is a complex family consisting of pseudogenes and functional members. TaHKT2;1 genes do not have an apparent role in controlling root Na+ uptake in bread wheat seedlings under experimental conditions in this study, contrary to existing hypotheses. However, TaHKT2;1 genes or, indeed other genes in the same chromosome region on 7AL, are candidates that may control Na+ transport from root to sheath and regulate K+ levels in different plant tissues.

Keywords

IWGSS Cis regulatory elements Gene expression Aneuploid lines Tissue Na+ Tissue K+

Background

Saline soils are a challenge to cereal production in many regions of the world. Osmotic and ion-specific damage that significantly reduces crop growth in saline soils is largely due to excess of Na+ and Cl ions [1, 2]. In bread wheat, a balance between restricting Na+ net uptake at roots and subsequent transport into shoots and sub-cellular compartmentation to cope with unfavourable levels of Na+ is needed to maintain ion homeostasis for plant growth and development under saline conditions [3, 4]. The regulation of Na+ transport and its genetic basis is, therefore, of significant interest in order to assist in development of targeted strategies for enhanced salinity tolerance in crops.

A major portion of Na+ exclusion (>98%) in bread wheat is accomplished by restricting net Na+ uptake at the soil-root interface and net xylem loading in roots [2], yet a number of channels and transporters facilitate Na+ influx when Na+ concentration is high in the soil solution [58]. Channel and transporter proteins are potential targets to reduce Na+ net uptake by roots and have been a major focus to investigate their role in crop tolerance to salinity. Electrophysiological observations and pharmacology of 22Na+ tracer influxes in cereal roots support the hypothesis that the bulk of Na+ influx is mediated by voltage-independent, non-selective cation channels (VICs/NSCCs) [911]. In addition, two transporters LCT1[12, 13] and HKT2;1[14] can mediate high and/or low-affinity Na+ transport in wheat. While both VICs/NSCCs [15] and LCT1[13] facilitate Ca2+ dependant unidirectional influx of various cations, TaHKT2;1 mediates Ca2+ independent influx of Na+ and K+[16, 17]. Although, TaHKT2;1 is a Na+/K+ co-transporter, the protein has a minor significance in K+ nutrition as Na+ - coupled K+ uptake has limited physiological relevance in terrestrial species [18]. Therefore, among the genes encoding candidate proteins involved in root Na+ influx, TaHKT2;1 is of particular interest in crop breeding because of its high specificity for Na+ and the potential to manipulate TaHKT2;1 genes without largely interfering with the homeostasis of nutritionally important ions (e.g., K+, Ca2+) in plants.

TaHKT2;1 has a Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly type K+/Na+ selectivity pore [19, 20] and when expressed in Xenopus oocytes and yeast heterologous systems, preferentially mediates high affinity K+ uptake when external Na+ is at sub-millimolar levels, but facilitates low-affinity Na+ influx when millimolar levels of external Na+ are in excess of K+[16, 21, 22]. The ion transport properties of TaHKT2;1 were determined when point mutations within the TaHKT2;1 gene improved K+ specificity and reduced Na+ influx in Xenopus oocytes and yeast [21, 23]. Down regulation of TaHKT2;1 in transgenic bread wheat by expressing anti-sense or truncated sense constructs reduced Na+ levels in K+ starved seedling roots [24]. Since the gene is expressed in the cortical cells of roots, alongside in xylem parenchyma in leaves, it is possible that the protein encoded by TaHKT2;1 is associated with root Na+ uptake and translocation [24]. Therefore, it appears that under saline conditions TaHKT2;1 is responsible for substantial Na+ influx into roots of bread wheat and transport to other parts of the plant.

TaHKT2;1 has been identified as a multi-gene family consisting of five individual members distributed across homeologous chromosome group 7 in bread wheat [25]. Although previous studies identified the function of Na+ transport in one member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family in heterologous systems [21, 23] and in transgenic plants by down-regulation of one or more genes [24], the contribution of each member of the gene family and their interactions to control ion accumulation in wheat remains unknown. This study aimed to understand the organization and variability of each member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family, transcriptional regulation, their encoded proteins, and potential contributions to controlling Na+ and K+ status in bread wheat. The study used an existing full length cDNA (FL-cDNA) sequence (U16709) as a basis to select and characterize all members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family using the International Wheat Genome Survey Sequence (IWGSS) (http://www.wheatgenome.org).

Results

Organization and structure of TaHKT2;1multi-gene family

The FL-cDNA of TaHKT2;1, U16709, was used as query sequence in BLASTN analysis of IWGSS to identify members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family in hexaploid wheat. Six significant hits having greater than 90% nucleotide identity with the FL-cDNA were retrieved that identified three TaHKT2;1 genes on the long arm of chromosome 7A (TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, TaHKT2;1 7AL-2, TaHKT2;1 7AL-3), two genes on the long arm of 7B (TaHKT2;1 7BL-1, TaHKT2;1 7BL-2), and one on the long arm of 7D (TaHKT2;1 7DL-1). The six genes were further studied for gene structure and sequence variability. Gene structure was analysed by splice junction prediction software, and subsequently validated in DNA sequence alignments with the FL-cDNA, U16709, revealed three exons interrupted by two introns for each gene (Figure 1) with intron splice junction sites having the conserved motif, 5′ GT- AG 3′. TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 were identical in their introns and exons and each had a single nucleotide deletion at +191 bp in exon 1 relative to the other genes on chromosome 7A, 7B and 7D whereby the translated sequences predicted an in-frame stop codon causing pre-mature termination and a significantly truncated protein of 65 amino acid residues. Therefore, it appeared that TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 were duplicated pseudogenes. Accordingly, TaHKT2;1 represented a multi-gene family of six individual genes in bread wheat of which four (TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, TaHKT2;1 7BL-1, TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1) were identified as functional members.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2229-14-159/MediaObjects/12870_2014_Article_1580_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Gene structure of each member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family. Exons are shown in grey boxes interrupted by 2 introns (black bars). Sub-genome specific sequence variations were identified in reference to TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2. Black vertical bars indicate SNPs, and open triangles and close triangles indicate insertions and deletions, respectively.

The functional TaHKT2;1 genes were further analysed using multiple DNA sequence alignments and revealed 90-94% nucleotide identity (Table 1). The two genes, TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 were identical in introns and exons (thus hereafter designated as TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2) and shared 100% nucleotide identity with the full-length cDNA, U16709, so it was reasonable to assume that these genes on 7BL were the source of the query cDNA sequence. TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 were subsequently used in pairwise sequence comparisons with TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 to identify variations in intron and exon regions (Figure 1 and Table 2). Sequence divergence in the intron regions of the TaHKT2;1 genes were clearly evident, including SNPs and INDELs (Table 3). Exon sequence variation between TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 and genes on 7A and 7D were largely represented by SNPs, whereby 36% of the SNPs in TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and 41% of the SNPs in TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 represented non-synonymous substitutions (Table 3). Thus, sequence comparisons against TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 identified members of TaHKT2;1 gene family exhibiting a degree of exon variability resulting in predicted protein differences.
Table 1

Percent DNA sequence and amino acid (parentheses) identity between functional members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family

Gene

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

-

  

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

91.3 (92.5)

-

 

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

94.3 (93.4)

90.1 (91.6)

-

Table 2

Attributes of exons, introns and proteins of functional members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family

  

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

Exon

Exon 1 length (bp)

1172

1172

1172

Exon 2 length (bp)

228

228

222

Exon 3 length (bp)

202

202

202

Non-synonymous SNPs

35

-

43

Total number of SNPs

95

 

104

Insertions (bp)

0

-

0

Deletions (bp)

0

-

6

Intron

Intron 1 length (bp)

130

126

129

Intron 2 length (bp)

263

256

256

SNPs

59

-

61

Insertions (bp)

16

-

13

Deletions (bp)

4

-

10

Protein

Amino acid length

533

533

531

Amino acid substitutions

31

-

35

SNPs and INDELS were identified using TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/ TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 as the reference sequence.

Table 3

Salt induced cis– acting regulatory elements identified in the promoter regions of the functional TaHKT2;1 genes

Cis-regulatory element

Conserved sequence motif

Gene

Associated families of salt-stress activated TFs

Reference

ABRE

ACGTGG/T

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1(1)

AREB/ABF (ABA responsive element- binding proteins)

[26]

TaHKT2;1 7BL-2(1) TaHKT2;1 7DL-1(5)

AtMYC2

CACATG

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1(1) TaHKT2;1 7BL-1(2) TaHKT2;1 7BL-2(3) TaHKT2;1 7DL-1(5)

MYC/MYB (myelocytomatosis/myeloblastosis)

[27]

DRE/CRT

CCCGAC

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1(1) TaHKT2;1 7BL-1(2) TaHKT2;1 7BL-2(1) TaHKT2;1 7DL-1(1)

CBF/DREB (C-repeat binding factor/dehydration- responsive element-binding proteins)

[28]

MYCATERD1

CATGTG

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1(3) TaHKT2;1 7BL-1(2) TaHKT2;1 7BL-2(3) TaHKT2;1 7DL-1(4)

plant specific family of TFs, NAC (No apical meristem)

[29]

GT-1 box

GAAAAA

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1(10) TaHKT2;1 7BL-2(4) TaHKT2;1 7DL-1(12)

Trihelix family, also known as GT factors

[30]

W-Box

TTTGACY

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1(12) TaHKT2;1 7BL-1(10) TaHKT2;1 7BL-2(10) TaHKT2;1 7DL-1(10)

WRKY transcription factors

[31]

The number of each element in the promoter represented in each gene is shown in parenthesis.

Analysis of predicted proteins of TaHKT2;1multi-gene family

Functional members of TaHKT2;1 gene family on 7AL and 7BL encoded proteins of 533 amino acids whereas the gene on 7DL encoded a protein of 531 amino acids (Table 2) having 91% to 93% protein identity (Table 1) with TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2. Sequence alignment (Figure 2) coupled with analysis of hydrophobicity (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and 3D structures of the predicted proteins revealed the topology of four sequentially arranged membrane-pore-membrane (MPM) domains in each protein (Figure 2). Glycine molecules at Gly91, Gly246, Gly370 and Gly473 that form the selectivity pore filters [19, 20] were conserved in each protein (Figure 2) predicting that each functional member has potential to mediate both K+ and Na+ transport. Interestingly, several amino acid substitutions were identified in the close proximity of filter glycine residues on first, second and fourth MPM domains of TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 compared to TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 (Figure 2). In the first M1aPaM2a, Ile95 in TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 was substituted by Val, an amino acid having similar physical properties, in both TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1. The substitution Thr96 for another hydrophilic but larger amino acid Lys was shared in both TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1. The second M1bPbM2b identified two substitutions, one at Ala240 for Ser, a more hydrophilic amino acid in the same size range and Cys242 for a large hydrophobic amino acid Phe in TaHKT2;1 7DL-1. The fourth M1dPdM2d identified Ala472 in both TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1, substituted for Val, an amino acid carrying large aliphatic hydrophilic side chains. Altered physical properties and steric hindrance caused by the amino acid substitutions could, therefore, potentially change structural properties of the filters and manifest modified protein functions for ion selectivity and transport.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2229-14-159/MediaObjects/12870_2014_Article_1580_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Predicted proteins of functional members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family containing four membrane-pore-membrane structures. Cytoplasmic, trans-membrane, and p-loop domains are in pink, purple and green backgrounds respectively. Amino acid substitutions are indicated in blue and the filter glycine residues in red.

Promoter analysis of functional TaHKT2;1members

Promoter diversity was investigated in functional members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family by analysis of 2000 bp region up-stream of the predicted translation start site. The core promoter element, TATAA box (−69 bp) was conserved in all functional members of the TaHKT2;1 family. Although TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 were identical in exon and intron sequences, they shared only 42.7% DNA sequence identity between promoters. The promoter region of TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 genes showed 65.8% and 43.5% DNA sequence identity, respectively, compared with TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2. Table 3 summarizes the number and type of cis-acting regulatory elements (CREs) identified in promoters of functional members of the TaHKT2;1 family using the PLANTcare and PLACE databases. Promoters of all functional TaHKT2;1 genes contained a number of CREs known to be involved in salt activated response in plants and each gene shared at least five CREs of different categories. Therefore, it appeared that salt stress-activated transcription factors (TFs) interact with CREs to regulate TaHKT2;1 genes.

Analysis of TaHKT2;1 pseudogenes in Triticumspecies

The duplicated pseudogenes, TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3, showed an in-frame stop codon in exon 1 resulting in a truncated protein of 65 amino acids (Figure 3A) relative to its functional counterpart, TaHKT2;1 7AL-1. The pseudogenes were examined across selected Triticum species in order to gain further insight into their origin and evolution. The 5′ terminus of exon 1 including 50 bp upstream from the translation start site was amplified from diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheats using gene specific primers 5′A2/3 F and 5′A2/3 R (Table 4). Specificity of the primers that were used to amplify the region encoding the premature stop codon in exon 1 was confirmed by the absence of PCR amplicons from nullisomic-tetrasomic lines N7AT7B and N7AT7D (Figure 3B). The single base deletion at +191 bp in TaHKT2;1 7AL-2/-3 relative to TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 (Figure 3C) responsible for the in-frame stop codon was conserved in all diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Triticum accessions analysed (Figure 3D) indicating that the deletion event was an ancient evolutionary sequence variant and the resulting pseudogenes were retained in modern durum and bread wheat accessions. Selection constraints on the genes were estimated by replacement (Ka) to silent (Ks) ratio [32]. The ratio between the functional genes TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 was 0.20. Higher ratio value of 0.56 between TaHKT2;1 7AL-2/ -3 and the functional counterpart TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 indicated relaxed selection pressure on the pseudogenes.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2229-14-159/MediaObjects/12870_2014_Article_1580_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Sequence analysis of single base deletion in pseudogenes TaHKT2;1 7AL-2/ TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 from different Triticum species . (A) Gene structure and partial DNA sequence with predicted protein showing pre-mature stop codon indicated by an asterisk. (B) Nullisomic- tetrasomic analysis of gene specific primer pair 5′A2/3 F and 5′A2/3 R for amplifying and sequencing the region coding for premature stop codon. (C) Sequence chromatogram comparing the functional TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 with TaHKT2;1 7AL-2/TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 where the single base deletion is highlighted by an arrow. (D) Sequences of the functional gene TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, the conserved single base deletion at +191 bp in TaHKT2;1 7AL-2/ TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 in Chinese Spring and in selected diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Triticum species. Single base deletion is shown by dash whereas SNPs between accessions are indicated in blue.

Table 4

Gene specific PCR primers targeting INDELs and SNPs to amplify individual members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family

Gene

Primer

Primer location (bp)

Primer sequence 5′-3′

PCR and the annealing temperature (°C)

TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3

5′A2/3 F

−56

GAGACCTATCTTGACACGCAT

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3

5′A2/3 R

+489

GACTCATCACTTTGTGCTGC

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

A1 F

+1325

GCACCACCCAGTGATGAC

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

A1 R

+1894

CCAGAAAAGCTGTATCGCA

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

B1/2 F

+1353

GAGAACACGAAAGGGAGAGT

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

B1/2 R

+1933

TCCATAGAGCATGACCGAT

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

D F

+1357

CGAGCACAAAAGGCAAGA

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

D R

+1955

TGGACACCGCAAACTCT

Touch down PCR at 55-50

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

FL:A1 F

−29

CATTTGTTTCTCCCAGTCG

Standard PCR at 53

TaHKT2;1 7AL-1

FL:A1 R

+2180

CCACACGTTGATAGATAATGTC

Standard PCR at 53

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

FL:B1/2 F

−19

CACACTCATACATAGCACCAT

Standard PCR at 53

TaHKT2;1 7BL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-2

FL:B1/2 R

+2251

TTCTCTTTCGCTACGATTGT

Standard PCR at 53

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

FL:D F

−23

GTTTCTCACTCATATATAGGACCA

Standard PCR at 56

TaHKT2;1 7DL-1

FL:D R

+2039

GTACGCAGCAGTTATACCAG

Standard PCR at 56

Expression of functional members of TaHKT2;1gene family

The expression of functional members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family were investigated by imposing NaCl treatments on Chinese Spring seedlings and detection of transcripts specific for each gene in roots, sheaths and leaf blades. After three days exposure at 200 mM NaCl treatment in the external solution, Na+ concentration was 4-fold higher in roots, 3-fold in sheath and 2-fold in leaves, compared to the control plants with no added NaCl in the external solution (Figure 4A) and, therefore, showed significant (P < 0.01) phenotypic differences for transcript analysis of the different TaHKT2;1 genes. Primers were designed to amplify FL-cDNA of each functional member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family and gene specificity of primers was validated using nullisomic-tetrasomic lines (Figure 4B). TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 were expressed in roots, sheaths and leaf blades under both low and high NaCl conditions whilst TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 was identified only in roots and sheaths (Figure 4C). Each functional member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family was down regulated in the leaf blades (Figure 4C). A unique feature of the TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 gene was an additional smaller transcript of approximately 600 bp in length identified only in root and sheath tissues under both NaCl treated and non-treated conditions (Figure 4C), indicating that alternative splicing was evident for this gene in these tissues. No RT-PCR-amplification of TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 or TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 was detected in any of the tissues analysed (data not shown), providing further evidence that these were, indeed, unprocessed pseudogenes.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2229-14-159/MediaObjects/12870_2014_Article_1580_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Transcriptional analysis of TaHKT2;1 gene family in T. aestivum L. cv. Chinese Spring. Tissue samples of each genotype were measured for ion concentration in triplicate and each genotype was replicated four times for each treatment. (A) Tissue Na+ concentrations in treatments with no added NaCl (dark grey) and 200 mM NaCl (light grey). (B) Nullisomic-tetrasomic analysis of gene specific primers used for transcript analysis. (C) RT-PCR and detection of FL- cDNA in roots, sheaths and leaf blades.

FL-cDNA transcripts of functional TaHKT2;1 genes expressed in root, sheath and leaf under low and high NaCl conditions were sequenced. The cDNA sequence for TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 [Genbank: KJ540616]; TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 [Genbank: U16709] and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 [Genbank: KJ540618] were identical from each tissue and were in perfect agreement with the predictions of gene structure in Figure 1 when aligned against the cognate genomic DNA sequence. Sequence analysis identified a 571 bp alternatively spliced transcript [Genbank: KJ540617] from TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 encoding a predicted protein of 133 amino acids. Alignment with genomic DNA identified a splice site within exon 1 resulting in the deleting of exon 2 and exon 3 and intervening introns relative to its larger cDNA counterpart [Genbank: KJ540616]. The alternatively spliced TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 sequence had the dinucleotide motif 5′-AT and AC-3′ at the exon-intron splice junction different to the conserved 5′GT and AG-3′ splice junction motifs in all other transcripts.

Tissue ion analyses of wheat aneuploid lines null for TaHKT2;1genes

An investigation of possible phenotypic effects of TaHKT2;1 genes was conducted by evaluating tissue Na+ and K+ concentrations in wheat aneuploid lines null for each member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family, when exposed to NaCl and different K+ supply in the external solution. The absence of DNA amplicons from aneuploid lines using gene specific PCR primers (Figure 5A) confirmed that TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 were located in the distal region of 7AL and 7DL respectively, whereas TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 were located within the proximal region of 7BL (Figure 5B). Therefore, the aneuploid lines 7AL-1 and Dt7BS were null for the functional genes TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 respectively, whereas 7DL-2 was null for TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 and suitable for comparing ion concentrations with Chinese Spring under NaCl and K+ supply.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2229-14-159/MediaObjects/12870_2014_Article_1580_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Deletion bin mapping of the TaHKT2;1 gene family. (A) Nullisomic tetrasomic and aneuploid line analysis using PCR primers specific for TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, TaHKT2;1 7AL-2/TaHKT2;1 7AL-3, TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 genes. (B) Allocation of TaHKT2;1 genes to deletion bin maps on homeologous group 7 chromosomes.

Analysis of tissue Na+ concentration showed no difference between aneuploid lines and Chinese Spring in roots, bulked leaf blades or youngest fully expanded leaf blade regardless of low (0.2 mM) or high (4 mM) K+ status when genotypes were treated with an external solution containing 200 mM NaCl (Figure 6A). An increase of 24% in sheath Na+ concentration was observed in the aneuploids, 7AL-1 (Figure 6A) compared to Chinese Spring under both low and high K+ conditions. Similarly, Dt7BS showed 25% increase in sheath Na+ but only under low K+ conditions. Therefore, the chromosomal regions containing TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 may have a significant effect on Na+ concentration in the sheath but not in the roots, bulk leaves nor the youngest fully expanded leaf blade. Interestingly, 7DL-2 null for TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 showed no significant difference between Chinese Spring (Figure 6A) indicating this gene does not have a role in controlling Na+ concentration in any tissue or treatment.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2229-14-159/MediaObjects/12870_2014_Article_1580_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Analysis of ion concentration in tissues from Chinese Spring and wheat aneuploid lines null for each functional TaHKT2;1 genes. Tissue samples of each genotype were measured for ion concentration in triplicate and each genotype was replicated four times for each salt treatment. (A) Mean Na+ concentrations (±SE) of various tissues of each genotype subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment in the presence of 0.2 mM or 4 mM K+. (B) Mean K+ concentrations (±SE) of various tissues of each genotype subjected to 4 mM K+ treatment in no added Na+ in or the presence of 200 mM NaCl. Significant differences in tissue concentrations of Na+ (p < 0.01, CV = 16) and K+ (p < 0.05, CV =11) between the aneuploids and Chinese Spring are indicated by an asterisk (*).

The same aneuploid lines when exposed to an external solution containing 200 mM NaCl and 4 mM K+ showed no differences in K+ concentration in bulked leaf blades regardless of the genotype or the Na+ status (Figure 6B). However, K+ concentration was reduced by 23% in the roots and 19% in the youngest fully expanded leaf blade for Dt7BS compared to Chinese Spring, but only under 200 mM NaCl treatment (Figure 6B). Similarly, sheath K+ was reduced by 12% in the aneuploid line 7AL-1 in the 200 mM NaCl treatment (Figure 6B). Therefore, it appears that the chromosomal regions containing TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 influence K+ status under high NaCl conditions in a tissue-specific manner. There was no significant difference in K+ between 7DL-2 and Chinese Spring (Figure 6B) indicating that TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 does not have a role in regulating K+ status in any tissue and treatments.

Discussion

This study provides a detailed characterization of the TaHKT2;1 multigene family in bread wheat which included four functional members and two pseudogenes. Despite presence of salt induced stress responsive elements in the promoter region it was found that the functional members of the TaHKT2;1 family were expressed under low and high NaCl levels in roots and sheaths, but were down regulated in leaf blades. Wheat aneuploid lines were used to provide evidence for a potential role of individual TaHKT2;1 gene family members in Na+ and K+ homeostasis in seedlings under low and high NaCl hydroponic conditions.

Although all members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family contained three exons and two introns sharing the same gene structure as Group II HKT genes from other monocots [33], DNA sequence differences resulted in a degree of variability at the protein level. Variation amongst the TaHKT2;1 genes and their encoded proteins could be of functional relevance. TaHKT2;1 proteins potentially acting as K+/Na+ cotransporters have a conserved Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly signature in the selectivity filter, yet the filter signature alone does not necessarily predict ion selective properties and other domains responsible for ion specificity need to be considered [34, 35]. In this regard, induced mutations within the cytoplasmic (L149, E180) or P-loop (A240, L247, F463 and E464) domains affected selectivity and the rate of uptake of K+ and Na+ by the TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 proteins in yeast and/or Xenopus oocytes heterologous systems [17, 19, 21, 23, 36, 37]. Interestingly, the majority of the amino acids that were mutated in previous experiments were conserved between the members of TaHKT2;1 family except for a A240S substitution in TaHKT2;1 7DL-1. In addition to A240S, five amino acid differences were identified within six base pair proximity to the filter glycine residues in the P-loops of TaHKT2;1 7AL-1, TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 compared to TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the amino acid differences between members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family in these regions may affect ion uptake properties (e.g. specificity and rate of ion transport). Since this study cloned FL-cDNAs of each member of the gene family, further investigations can be pursued using heterologous systems to evaluate the functional significance of the protein sequence variability for ion transport in the TaHKT2;1 gene family.

TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 shared typical characteristics of unprocessed pseudogenes, such as in-frame stop codons, location within close proximity to the functional genes on the same chromosome, and the absence of transcription [38]. Pseudogenes have previously been reported in the HKT super-family but their functional relevance is unknown [39]. Pseudogenes are thought to be an integral feature in evolution of polyploidy genomes, representing 12% of the genes in bread wheat [40] and may be of importance in gene or genome function. Pseudogenes in eukaryotes have been reported to have a regulatory role for genes from which they were derived, have non-coding functions or act as a source of genetic variability and were subjected to natural selection [38]. Conservation across progenitor genomes indicated that the single base deletion in exon 1 that caused a pre-mature stop codon in TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 was an ancient event created during evolution of the A genome progenitor species prior to, and maintained during, polyploidization of the tetraploid and hexaploid genomes. The Ka/Ks between the functional genes was close to the average Ka/Ks ratio of 0.2 previously estimated for functional wheat genes [41], providing evidence that the functional members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family was subjected to resilient purifying selection. Although TaHKT2;1 7AL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-3 had characteristics of pseudogenes the Ka/Ks value between these genes and TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 was less than the theoretical value of 1.0 for a bona-fide pseudogene [38], indicating a relaxed selective constraint during genome evolution. Furthermore, the fact that these pseudogenes were retained during evolution of the hexaploid wheat genome with gene structure conservation could indicate some functional importance.

Each member of the TaHKT2;1 gene family was variable for presence and frequency of salt induced CREs. Plant response to salinity is mediated by immediate and extensive reprogramming of the spatial and temporal gene transcription, instigated by the interaction of transcription factors with four major groups of CREs including ABA-independent CREs (CBF/DREB; NAC and ZF-HD) and ABA-dependent CREs (AREB/ABF; MYC/MYB) [42, 43], all of which were represented in TaHKT2;1 gene family. Interestingly, promoter diversity in AtHKT1;1 genes resulted in variable salt response in natural populations of Arabidopsis[44]. Similarly, variability in CREs contributed to diverse expression patterns of TaHKT1;5 in bread wheat and wild relatives under salt stress [45], supporting the hypothesis that HKT genes are regulated by CREs mediated mechanisms. The presence of these elements with varying copies and combinations predict salt response with variable expression patterns of individual TaHKT2;1 members.

Given the CREs identified in this study, it was expected that each TaHKT2;1 gene would show diverse transcriptional regulation, yet, no obvious transcript differences were detected between low and high NaCl treated plants. Similar observations were reported [24] where saline treatments imposed with K+ deficient conditions did not induce differences in TaHKT2;1 gene expression in two week old wheat seedlings. However, expression of TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 was up regulated by imposing K+ starved conditions in six day old wheat [46] indicating a rapid response of genes to external K+ in younger seedlings. In the present study, there was an obvious down regulation of TaHKT2;1 transcripts in leaf blades regardless of the NaCl concentration of the external solution, confirming adjustment of gene expression in this tissue. The extent of gene expression was further explored by mining wheat EST databases including NCBI, Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly and the TIGR Plant Transcript Assemblies, identifying a number of ESTs derived from pre-anthesis spikes and kernel tissue with 98-100% identity to members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family (data not shown). Further studies are needed to understand the expression of TaHKT2;1 gene family and how the various members influence ion homeostasis during different stages of plant development, various environmental conditions and variable salt levels.

An interesting feature of TaHKT2;1 gene expression was the level of complexity caused by alternative splicing of a 571 bp transcript unique to TaHKT2;1 7AL-1. Alternative splicing is evident in 25 to 42% of bread wheat genes whereby some forms are thought to play a role in regulating functional transcript levels [47]. Alternative splicing at non-conventional–splice junctions has been reported in rice OsHKT1;5 resulting in a premature stop codon and non-functional transcripts as a possible means of regulating mRNA degradation [34]. Similarly, alternative splicing event in TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 indicates a rare unstable splice-junction motif that may act as an embedded molecular switch for post-transcriptional regulation and mRNA turn-over processes, which presumably may then influence levels of protein production.

The use of wheat aneuploid lines null for specific members of the TaHKT2;1 family provided a system to analyse phenotypic effects of the genes on tissue ion concentrations. This approach provided evidence that a gene does not have a specific role when there was no significant difference between its corresponding aneuploid line and Chinese Spring (containing the full chromosome complement) whereas differences indicated that the gene would be a candidate controlling tissue Na+ and/or K+ status. The results, therefore, corroborate that TaHKT2;1 genes neither regulate root Na+ uptake nor Na+ accumulation in bulk leaf blades and youngest fully expanded leaf blade. Nevertheless, presence of transcripts for all TaHKT2;1 gene family members in these tissues under low and high NaCl conditions indicate alternative roles if they are translated into proteins. The higher sheath Na+ concentration in 7AL-1 and Dt7BS is likely from increased Na+ concentration in the xylem flow and being preferentially stored in sheaths. Wheat and other grasses do have mechanisms for withdrawal of Na+ from xylem in roots and sheath to reduce delivery of Na+ into the leaf blade [48]. Therefore, TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 genes are candidates regulating Na+ accumulation in sheaths, perhaps by modifying Na+ in the root xylem that affects the flow of Na+ into sheaths. The possibility of other genes in the same chromosomal region contributing to this phenotypic effect cannot be excluded and further studies are needed to confirm the function of TaHKT2;1 genes on 7AL and 7BL in controlling Na+ accumulation in the sheaths.

The TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 gene may also regulate K+ accumulation in the sheath but only under high NaCl conditions, whereas TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 may serve a similar role in roots and the youngest fully expanded leaf blade, evident by the lower K+ in these tissues in the Dt7BS line. Since TaHKT2;1 genes are not involved in K+ uptake by roots under saline conditions [18, 49], the lower root K+ concentration observed for Dt7BS in this study would be due to a greater net K+ translocation from roots to shoots. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/ TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 genes control K+ translocation in specific tissues of salt stressed wheat. Extensive functional redundancy of K+ transport systems [50] can be a challenge in isolated studies on individual transporter proteins, yet evidence in the present study identified the importance of further investigating TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/TaHKT2;1 7BL-2 and TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 genes in controlling K+ homeostasis.

Conclusions

TaHKT2;1 genes has been of interest because the encoded proteins implement pathways for Na+ entry into wheat in saline conditions [24]. However, previous studies do not recognize a role of individual members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family in controlling Na+ or indeed, of K+, during plant growth and development. The present study has highlighted diversity amongst the TaHKT2;1 gene family and predicted proteins, as well as promoter variability in salt signalling and presence of TaHKT2;1 transcripts in different tissues, under low and high levels of external Na+ and K+, gaining knowledge that TaHKT2;1 genes could assume multiple roles in bread wheat. The phenotypic effects when individual genes were deleted in bread wheat showed that TaHKT2;1 gene family are not involved in regulating root or leaf blade Na+ concentration but TaHKT2;1 7AL-1 and TaHKT2;1 7BL-1/-2 may be candidate genes controlling sheath Na+ concentration and K+ status in different tissues and experimental conditions. TaHKT2;1 7DL-1 had no apparent role in regulating Na+ and K+ status in different tissue and treatments in this study. In summary, the present findings from combined molecular and physiological studies provided a broader perspective of the role of the TaHKT2;1 family of genes in bread wheat.

Methods

Plant material

Bread wheat variety Triticum aestivum L. cv. Chinese Spring, six nullisomic-tetrasomic lines (N7AT7B, N7AT7D, N7BT7A, N7BT7D, N7DT7A, N7DT7B), eight deletion lines (7AL-1, 7AS-8, 7BL-2, 7BL-7, 7DL-2, 7DL-3, 7DL-5, 7DS-5) and ditelosomic lines (Dt7BL and Dt7BS) were kindly provided by Dr John Raupp, Wheat Genetic and Genomic Resources Centre, Kansas State University, USA. Six hexaploid cultivated bread wheat varieties Calingiri, Ducula, Krichauff, Westonia, SARC-1 and a tetraploid variety (T. turgidum L.) Tamaroi were obtained from the germplasm collection at the Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia. DNA samples of the diploid species, T. monococcum (accession 4044) was provided by Dr Evans Lagudah, CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, Australia.

In-silico analysis of TaHKT2;1gene family

The TaHKT2;1 FL-cDNA, U16709, was used as the query sequence in BLASTN to search IWGSS database (http://www.wheatgenome.org) and retrieve coding and promoter regions of the individual members of TaHKT2;1 gene family. In-silico gene structure predictions for individual members of the TaHKT2;1 family were made using Spidey (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/spidey/), GeneSeqer (http://www.plantgdb.org/cgi-bin/GeneSeqer/index.cg) and SIM4 (http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/sim4.php) software. Intron-exon structures for each member were confirmed by aligning retrieved genomic sequences with the FL-cDNA, U16709. DNA and protein sequence analysis and structure predictions were made using GENEIOUS 6.0.3 [51] and phylogenetic analysis was performed in MEGA 5.05 [52].

The predicted proteins were analysed for structural and functional elements including hydrophobicity and membrane topology using TMHMM Server 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) and MPEx 3.2 [53] (http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/mpex/) software suites. Three dimensional structures of the proteins were predicted by PHYRE 2 (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index). Protein sequence alignments, hydrophobicity plots and the 3-D structures were used to elucidate structural domains of the putative proteins.

DNA sequence 2000 bp upstream of predicted initiation site were analysed for cis-acting regulatory elements (CREs) associated with salt stress response in PlantCARE [54] and PLACE [55] databases.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Plant genomic DNA was extracted from leaves using a phenol-chloroform-based method as described in [56] and was used as a template for PCR to amplify individual members of the TaHKT2;1 family. Gene specific primer pairs were designed by targeting insertions and/or deletions (INDELs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on 3′ terminus mismatch described in [57]. NetPrimer (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/netprimer/netprlaunch/netprlaunch.html) was used to confirm primer compatibility. Primer information is summarized in Table 1. PCR reactions contained 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each deoxyribonucleotides, 10 μM of each primer, 1X PCR buffer, 0.1 U taq DNA polymerase (BIOTAQ™ DNA Polymerase, Bioline, Australia) and 50 ng of template DNA in a 20 μl reaction volume. Cycle conditions for standard PCR were 35 cycles of 94°C 30 sec, primer annealing temperature 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec and the final extension 7 min at 72°C; and for touchdown PCR were five cycles of 94°C 30 sec, 55-50°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec; and then 35 cycles of 94°C 30 sec, 50°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec and the final extension 7 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5X Tris-acetate EDTA at constant voltage (90 V) for 30 min and visualized under UV light using Gel Doc System (BioRad, Italy) after staining with ethidium bromide.

Hydroponic screening and tissue Na+ and K+ analysis of wheat aneuploid lines null for TaHKT2;1genes

Seeds of six selected wheat deletion and ditelosomic lines were washed in 0.04% sodium hypochlorite (42 g/L) for 30 sec, rinsed in deionized water, and placed on a mesh float on aerated 0.1 strength nutrient solution in the dark for three days. Seedlings were then transferred to 0.25 strength nutrient solution for one day. Nutrient composition at full strength was: (mM) K+, 3.95; Ca2+, 4; Mg2+, 0.4; NH4+, 0.625; NO3, 4.375; SO42−, 1.9; HPO42−, 0.2; Fe-EDTA, 0.05; MES, 1.0; and micronutrients of one-quarter-concentration in Hoagland solution (pH was adjusted to 6.5 using Ca(OH)2). Four day old seedlings were then transferred to full strength nutrient solution in aerated, foil-covered, 4.5 L pots for 12 days. Each pot carried one individual of each of all six genotypes arranged randomly in each pot. There were four replicates of each genotype for each treatment in the experiment and the pots were arranged in a completely randomised design. Seedlings were held upright by a foam holder at the stem base inserted into individual holes in the pot lids. The experiment was carried out in a temperature controlled phytotron (20 ± 3°C/15 ± 2°C day/night) and the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) recorded at midday was at ca. 1,400 - 1,500 μmol m−2 s−1. Solution levels in pots were maintained by topping up with deionized water.

In order to induce expression and study phenotypic effects of the TaHKT2;1 gene family, the plants were subjected to low K+ conditions prior to imposing salt treatments [24, 46]. As known TaHKT2;1 transporters might be involved with either Na+ and/or K+ transport [16, 21, 22] NaCl treatments were also imposed at the two K+ levels: low (0.2 mM) K+, where high affinity transport systems for K+ dominate and high (4 mM) K+, where K+ uptake kinetics was determined by low affinity systems [58]. 12 day old seedlings were subjected to low K+ conditions for four days in a modified nutrient solution without added K+. The media contained (mM) Ca2+, 4; Mg2+, 0.4; NH4+, 0.825; NO3, 4.375; SO42- , 0.4; HPO42-, 0.2; Fe-EDTA, 0.05; MES, 1.0; and micronutrients at one-quarter-concentrations in Hoagland solution (pH = 6.5, adjusted with Ca(OH)2) at a background Na+ and K+ concentrations of 0. 3 mM and 0.1 mM, respectively. After 4 days of low K+ level pre-treatment, 200 mM NaCl was applied to designated pots, so as to obtain four different Na+/K+ combinations: no added Na+/0.2 mM K+, no added Na+/4 mM K+, 200 mM Na+/0.2 mM K+ and 200 mM Na+/4 mM K+. The NaCl treatment was applied in 50 mM increments at 12 hour intervals and plants were maintained at the final 200 mM concentration for a full 3 days. The youngest fully expanded leaf blade, bulk leaf blades (all others), sheaths and roots of each plant were sampled. Prior to excision, roots were washed three times for 10 secs each in a solution containing 4 mM CaSO4 and 368 mM mannitol (200 mM treated plants) or in 4 mM CaSO4 (plants subjected to no added NaCl). Leaves and sheath samples were rinsed in deionized water. All tissue samples for ion analyses were oven-dried at 70°C, weighed and then ground to a powder. Samples of dried powdered tissue (100 mg) were extracted in 5 ml of 0.5 M HNO3 for 3 days on a mechanical shaker. Na+ and K+ were measured in technical triplicate using a flame photometer (Sherwood 410, Cambridge) and mean values represented each treatment replicate tissue sample. The reliability of the methods was confirmed by analyses of a reference tissue (broccoli, ASPAC Plant number 85) taken through the same procedures. Mean values from 4 treatment replicates of each genotype were analysed by ANOVA using SAS 9.4 (SAS Inc., USA) software.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

T. aestivum var. Chinese Spring was grown in hydroponics and treated with NaCl as described above. Leaf blades (including youngest fully expanded leaf blade), sheaths and roots of plants treated with 4 mM K+ with no added Na+ and 4 mM K+ with 200 mM NaCl were harvested after treating the plants for three days, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction and RT-PCR. Duplicate tissue samples were harvested for Na+ analysis (described above). Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). First strand cDNA was synthesised using RT Omniscript Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Integrity of synthesised cDNA was verified by RT-PCR using primers (forward 5′-CGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC −3′, reverse 5′-TCACACAGGAAACAGCTATGAC −3′) designed for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene [59]. FL- cDNA of individual members of the TaHKT2;1 gene family were amplified from cDNA preparations using primer pairs FL:A1 F and FL:A1 R, FL:A2/3 F and FL:A2/3R, FL:B1/2 F and FL:B1/2 R and FL:D1 F and FL:D1 R (Table 1).

FL-cDNA cloning and sequencing

RT-PCR amplicons were separated and excised from 1% agarose gels, purified using Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, CA,USA), and cloned into pGEM®-T Easy Vector Systems (Promega, CA, USA). Three bacterial colonies containing cloned TaHKT2;1 FL-cDNA were selected and DNA templates were purified using Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps (Promega, CA, USA). The cloned fragments were sequenced using BigDye™ sequencing chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Perkin Elmer, Weiterstadt, Germany) and analysed using GENEIOUS 6.0.3 [51].

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was partly funded by a Scholarship for International Research Fees (SIRF) and a University International Stipend (UIS) awarded to HACKA and a postdoctoral fellowship from the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan awarded to TUH. The authors are grateful to Dr Klaus Oldach for critically reviewing the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Plant Biology and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia
(2)
State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Murdoch University
(3)
College of Agriculture, D. G. Khan, University of Agriculture Faisalabad
(4)
Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia

References

  1. Maathuis F, Amtmann A: K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann Bot. 1999, 84: 123-133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tester M, Davenport R: Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot. 2003, 91: 503-527.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Munns R: Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25: 239-250.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Munns R, Tester M: Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008, 59: 651-681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Plett C, Moller D, Skrumsager I: Na+ transport in glycophytic plants: what we know and would like to know. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33: 612-626.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kronzucker HJ, Britto DT: Sodium transport in plants: a critical review. New Phytol. 2011, 189: 54-81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang J-L, Flowers TJ, Wang S-M: Mechanisms of sodium uptake by roots of higher plants. Plant Soil. 2010, 326: 45-60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Amtmann A, Sanders D: Mechanisms of Na+ uptake by plant cells. Adv Bot Res. 1998, 29: 75-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tyerman SD, Skerrett M, Garrill A, Findlay GP, Leigh RA: Pathways for the permeation of Na+ and Cl into protoplasts derived from the cortex of wheat roots. J Exp Bot. 1997, 48: 459-480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tyerman S, Skerrett I: Root ion channels and salinity. Sci Hortic. 1998, 78: 175-235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Buschmann PH, Vaidyanathan R, Gassmann W, Schroeder JI: Enhancement of Na+ uptake currents, time-dependent inward-rectifying K+ channel currents, and K+ channel transcripts by K+ starvation in wheat root cells. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122: 1387-1398.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schachtman DP, Kumar R, Schroeder JI, Marsh EL: Molecular and functional characterization of a novel low-affinity cation transporter (LCT1) in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997, 94: 11079-11084.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Amtmann A, Fischer M, Marsh EL, Stefanovic A, Sanders D, Schachtman DP: The wheat cDNA LCT1 generates hypersensitivity to sodium in a salt-sensitive yeast strain. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126: 1061-1071.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schachtman DP, Schroeder JI: Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher plants. Nature. 1994, 370: 655-658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Demidchik V, Maathuis FJ: Physiological roles of nonselective cation channels in plants: from salt stress to signalling and development. New Phytol. 2007, 175: 387-404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Almeida P, Katschnig D, de Boer AH: HKT transporters- state of the art. Int J Mol Sci. 2013, 14: 20359-20385.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gassmann W, Rubio F, Schroeder JI: Alkali cation selectivity of the wheat root high‒affinity potassium transporter HKT1. Plant J. 1996, 10: 869-882.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Maathuis FJ, Verlin D, Smith FA, Sanders D, Fernandez JA, Walker NA: The physiological relevance of Na+ coupled K+ transport. Plant Physiol. 1996, 112: 1609-1616.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato Y, Sakaguchi M, Mori Y, Saito K, Nakamura T, Bakker EP, Sato Y, Goshima S, Uozumi N: Evidence in support of a four transmembrane-pore-transmembrane topology model for the Arabidopsis thaliana Na+/K+ translocating AtHKT1 protein, a member of the superfamily of K+ transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001, 98: 6488-6493.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mäser P, Hosoo Y, Goshima S, Horie T, Eckelman B, Yamada K, Yoshida K, Bakker EP, Shinmyo A, Oiki S: Glycine residues in potassium channel-like selectivity filters determine potassium selectivity in four-loop-per-subunit HKT transporters from plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002, 99: 6428-6433.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rubio F, Gassmann W, Schroeder JI: Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science. 1995, 270: 1660-1663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sassi A, Mieulet D, Khan I, Moreau B, Gaillard I, Sentenac H, Véry A-A: The rice monovalent cation transporter OsHKT2; 4: revisited ionic selectivity. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160: 498-510.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu W, Schachtman DP, Zhang W: Partial deletion of a loop region in the high affinity K+ transporter HKT1 changes ionic permeability leading to increased salt tolerance. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 27924-27932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Laurie S, Feeney KA, Maathuis FJ, Heard PJ, Brown SJ, Leigh RA: A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. Plant J. 2002, 32: 139-149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang S, Spielmeyer W, Lagudah ES, Munns R: Comparative mapping of HKT genes in wheat, barley, and rice, key determinants of Na+ transport, and salt tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2008, 59: 927-937.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiong L, Ishitani M, Zhu J-K: Interaction of osmotic stress, temperature, and abscisic acid in the regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119: 205-212.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K: Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell Online. 2003, 15: 63-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dubouzet JG, Sakuma Y, Ito Y, Kasuga M, Dubouzet EG, Miura S, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi‒Shinozaki K: OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought‒, high‒salt‒and cold‒responsive gene expression. Plant J. 2003, 33: 751-763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakashima K, Takasaki H, Mizoi J, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K: NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2012, 1819: 97-103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Park HC, Kim ML, Kang YH, Jeon JM, Yoo JH, Kim MC, Park CY, Jeong JC, Moon BC, Lee JH: Pathogen-and NaCl-induced expression of the SCaM-4 promoter is mediated in part by a GT-1 box that interacts with a GT-1-like transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 2150-2161.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE: The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5: 199-206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li W-H: Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J Mol Evol. 1993, 36: 96-99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Platten JD, Cotsaftis O, Berthomieu P, Bohnert H, Davenport RJ, Fairbairn DJ, Horie T, Leigh RA, Lin H-X, Luan S: Nomenclature for HKT transporters, key determinants of plant salinity tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11: 372-374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cotsaftis O, Plett D, Shirley N, Tester M, Hrmova M: A two-staged model of Na+ exclusion in rice explained by 3D modeling of HKT transporters and alternative splicing. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e39865-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Waters S, Gilliham M, Hrmova M: Plant high-affinity potassium (HKT) transporters involved in salinity tolerance: structural insights to probe differences in ion selectivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2013, 14: 7660-7680.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Diatloff E, Kumar R, Schachtman DP: Site directed mutagenesis reduces the Na+ affinity of HKT1, an Na+ energized high affinity K+ transporter. FEBS Lett. 1998, 432: 31-36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubio F, Schwarz M, Gassmann W, Schroeder JI: Genetic selection of mutations in the high affinity K+ transporter HKT1 that define functions of a loop site for reduced Na+ permeability and increased Na + tolerance. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 6839-6847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Balakirev ES, Ayala FJ: Pseudogenes: are they “junk” or functional DNA?. Annu Rev Genet. 2003, 37: 123-151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Garciadeblas B, Senn ME, Banuelos MA, Rodríguez‒Navarro A: Sodium transport and HKT transporters: the rice model. Plant J. 2003, 34: 788-801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wicker T, Mayer KF, Gundlach H, Martis M, Steuernagel B, Scholz U, Šimková H, Kubaláková M, Choulet F, Taudien S: Frequent gene movement and pseudogene evolution is common to the large and complex genomes of wheat, barley, and their relatives. Plant Cell Online. 2011, 23: 1706-1718.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawaura K, Mochida K, Enju A, Totoki Y, Toyoda A, Sakaki Y, Kai C, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Seki M: Assessment of adaptive evolution between wheat and rice as deduced from full-length common wheat cDNA sequence data and expression patterns. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 271-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zou C, Sun K, Mackaluso JD, Seddon AE, Jin R, Thomashow MF, Shiu S-H: Cis-regulatory code of stress-responsive transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011, 108: 14992-14997.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuteja N: Mechanisms of high salinity tolerance in plants. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 428: 419-438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rus A, Baxter I, Muthukumar B, Gustin J, Lahner B, Yakubova E, Salt DE: Natural variants of AtHKT1 enhance Na+ accumulation in two wild populations of Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2: e210-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Babgohari MZ, Niazi A, Moghadam AA, Deihimi T, Ebrahimie E: Genome-wide analysis of key salinity-tolerance transporter (HKT1; 5) in wheat and wild wheat relatives (A and D genomes). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2013, 49: 97-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang T-B, Gassmann W, Rubio F, Schroeder JI, Glass AD: Rapid up-regulation of HKT1, a high-affinity potassium transporter gene, in roots of barley and wheat following withdrawal of potassium. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118: 651-659.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Akhunov ED, Sehgal S, Liang H, Wang S, Akhunova AR, Kaur G, Li W, Forrest KL, See D, Šimková H: Comparative analysis of syntenic genes in grass genomes reveals accelerated rates of gene structure and coding sequence evolution in polyploid wheat. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161: 252-265.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. James RA, Davenport RJ, Munns R: Physiological characterization of two genes for Na+ exclusion in durum wheat, Nax1 and Nax2. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142: 1537-1547.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Haro R, Bañuelos MA, Senn ME, Barrero-Gil J, Rodríguez-Navarro A: HKT1 mediates sodium uniport in roots. Pitfalls in the expression of HKT1 in yeast. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139: 1495-1506.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gierth M, Mäser P: Potassium transporters in plants–Involvement in K+ acquisition, redistribution and homeostasis. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581: 2348-2356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C: Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012, 28: 1647-1649.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Snider C, Jayasinghe S, Hristova K, White SH: MPEx: a tool for exploring membrane proteins. Protein Sci. 2009, 18: 2624-2628.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, van de Peer Y, Rouzé P, Rombauts S: PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 325-327.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T: Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 297-300.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Francki M, Crasta O, Sharma H, Ohm H, Anderson J: Structural organization of an alien Thinopyrum intermedium group 7 chromosome in US soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome. 1997, 40: 716-722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Huang X-Q, Brûlé-Babel A: Development of genome-specific primers for homoeologous genes in allopolyploid species: the waxy and starch synthase II genes in allohexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as examples. BMC Res Notes. 2010, 3: 140-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rains D, Epstein E: Sodium absorption by barley roots: role of the dual mechanisms of alkali cation transport. Plant Physiol. 1967, 42: 314-318.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nemoto Y, Sasakuma T: Specific expression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) gene by salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 2000, 158: 53-60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ariyarathna et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement