ANGUSTIFOLIA is a central component of tissue morphogenesis mediated by the atypical receptor-like kinase STRUBBELIG
- Yang Bai†1, 3,
- Prasad Vaddepalli†2,
- Lynette Fulton†2, 4,
- Hemal Bhasin†1,
- Martin Hülskamp1 and
- Kay Schneitz2Email author
© Bai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 24 January 2013
Accepted: 29 January 2013
Published: 31 January 2013
During plant tissue morphogenesis cells have to coordinate their behavior to allow the generation of the size, shape and cellular patterns that distinguish an organ. Despite impressive progress the underlying signaling pathways remain largely unexplored. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the atypical leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase STRUBBELIG (SUB) is involved in signal transduction in several developmental processes including the formation of carpels, petals, ovules and root hair patterning. The three STRUBBELIG-LIKE MUTANT (SLM) genes DETORQUEO (DOQ), QUIRKY (QKY) and ZERZAUST (ZET) are considered central elements of SUB-mediated signal transduction pathways as corresponding mutants share most phenotypic aspects with sub mutants.
Here we show that DOQ corresponds to the previously identified ANGUSTIFOLIA gene. The genetic analysis revealed that the doq-1 mutant exhibits all additional mutant phenotypes and conversely that other an alleles show the slm phenotypes. We further provide evidence that SUB and AN physically interact and that AN is not required for subcellular localization of SUB.
Our data suggest that AN is involved in SUB signal transduction pathways. In addition, they reveal previously unreported functions of AN in several biological processes, such as ovule development, cell morphogenesis in floral meristems, and root hair patterning. Finally, SUB and AN may directly interact at the plasma membrane to mediate SUB-dependent signaling.
KeywordsANGUSTIFOLIA Flower Ovule Receptor-like kinase Root hair patterning Signal transduction Tissue morphogenesis STRUBBELIG
Tissue morphogenesis and cellular patterning require extensive cellular communication. In plants the coordination of cellular behavior within a tissue is intrinsically linked to cell wall biogenesis and dynamics, as plant cells are connected through semi-rigid cell walls that drastically limit their relative movement. It is a major current challenge in plant biology to understand the mechanistic basis of intercellular communication and its connection to the cell wall during tissue morphogenesis.
In Arabidopsis, intercellular signaling mediated by the atypical leucine-rich repeat transmembrane receptor-like (LRR-RLK) STRUBBELIG (SUB) is essential for a number of developmental processes [1–6]. Ovules of sub mutants show frequent defects in the initiation and outgrowth of the outer integument. In addition, sub mutants exhibit twisted stems, petals and carpels/siliques. These phenotypes indicate a role for SUB in the control of integument initiation and outgrowth as well as stem and floral organ shape [1, 2, 6]. SUB also plays a role in internode length (and thus stem height), a trait that is potentially important for optimizing yield in crop plants.
At the cellular level, frequent misorientations of cell division planes were observed in e.g. L1 and L2 cells of young apical and floral meristems of sub mutants. Therefore, it was postulated that SUB signaling plays a role in orienting cell division planes in initiating integuments and floral meristems and thus influences the morphogenetic behavior of cells in a tissue context . In addition, SUB, also known as SCRAMBLED (SCM), is involved in root hair patterning [3, 4]. In this context, sub mutations lead to a randomization of root hair patterning such that root hairs develop ectopically or are not formed in the correct files.
In accordance with a perceived role of SUB in coordinating cellular behavior in tissue morphogenesis and cell patterning, SUB acts in a non-cell-autonomous fashion and mediates inter-cell-layer signaling across histogenic cell layers in the ovule, the floral meristem  and the root .
SUB belongs to the LRRV/STRUBBELIG-RECEPTOR FAMILY (SRF) family [8, 9] and has several protein domains including an extracellular domain with seven leucine-rich repeats, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic putative kinase domain [1, 3, 6]. Interestingly, a set of biochemical and genetic data indicated that although the kinase domain is essential for SUB function, enzymatic phosphotransfer activity is not [1, 6]. Thus, SUB is likely a so-called atypical or dead kinase.
Signaling by atypical kinases is poorly understood in plants [10, 11]. In addition, a detailed structure-function analysis of SUB suggested that the organ or cell-specific aspects of SUB-mediated signaling are not integrated at the SUB receptor, but involve other components that act together with, or downstream of SUB . In order to unravel the signal-transduction pathway of SUB we have previously identified three complementation groups sharing the s ub-like mutant (slm) phenotypes . In addition, it was found that there is significant overlap in SLM-sensitive gene expression. Taken together the results indicated that SLM genes contribute to SUB signal transduction. The corresponding genes are called QUIRKY (QKY), ZERZAUST (ZET), and DETORQUEO (DOQ) . Initial molecular analysis suggested that QKY encodes a putative membrane-localized protein with four C2 domains thus potentially connecting SUB to membrane-associated Ca2+- and phospholipid-dependent signaling .
In this work we focused on the DOQ gene. We show that doq-1 is a mutant allele of the ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN) gene. The doq-1 mutant carries a point mutation in the AN gene and we further demonstrate that doq-1 shares phenotypes with other an alleles and conversely, other an alleles show all slm phenotypes tested. These results rule out the possibility that doq-1 is an atypical allele. In addition, we provide evidence that SUB and AN can physically interact and that AN does not influence subcellular SUB distribution. Together our results reveal that AN is involved in SUB-dependent signaling events.
doq-1mutants exhibit an underbranched trichome and narrow leaf phenotype
Frequency of trichomes with different branch numbers in WT and an mutant lines on the fifth rosette leaves
an-2 35S::YFP:AN #2
Length and width measurements in rosette leaves
an-2 35S::YFP:AN #2
The DOQ gene corresponds to the ANgene
We tested whether the DOQ gene corresponds to the AN gene. Genetic analysis revealed no complementation of doq-1 with an-1 indicating that doq-1 is allelic to an. Furthermore, we sequenced the AN gene in the doq-1 mutant and demonstrated a G to A transition at position 509 in the cDNA coding region. This mutation causes a glycine to aspartic acid substitution at position 170 that is located in the predicted NAD(P)-binding domain.
an alleles show slmphenotypes
As most slm phenotypes had not been reported for an mutants, the question arose whether doq-1 is an atypical an allele showing new phenotypes or whether all an alleles share the slm phenotypes. We therefore compared slm phenotypes between doq-1, the an-1, an-2, an-EM1 alleles and an-2 35S::YFP:AN rescued lines.
SUB and AN can interact directly
ANis not required for subcellular localization of SUB:EGFP in roots
ERECTA influences the anphenotype
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that AN is involved in the SUB-dependent signaling mechanism. First, our genetic data show that all tested phenotypic aspects of sub are shared by an mutants. Second, DOQ/AN and SUB influence the expression of a common set of target genes. For example, 62 percent of genes misexpressed in sub flowers are also misexpressed in doq-1/an. Thirdly, AN and SUB are able to interact physically in two different assays. Finally, an and er mutations synergistically affect internode length and plant height, as was observed for sub and er. These results unexpectedly bring together two well-established but previously unconnected research fields. What do we learn for the function of AN and what for the function of SUB?
ANis involved in a broad variety of cellular processes
AN was initially identified by its narrow leaf phenotype and trichome phenotype . The closer analysis of the narrow leaf phenotypes suggested a role in cell polarity of leaf cells, such that the length of individual cells was increased and the width reduced [15, 20]. As cell number is also changed an additional role in cell division control was postulated. The characterization of the trichome phenotype placed AN in a regulatory network controlling branching initiation [12, 13]. In this context, a conspicuous lack of microtubule accumulation in the branch initiation zone of the developing trichome cell suggested a role of AN in the control of microtubule organization . The new slm phenotypes of an mutants reported in this study indicate that AN is involved in a SUB dependent signal transduction cascade. This function is separate from the first two functional aspects derived from leaf shape and trichome phenotypes, as sub mutants do not share these phenotypic aspects . Such a broad spectrum of functions is compatible with the proposed biochemical functions of the AN protein. The AN gene encodes a protein with homology to CtBP/BARS [21, 22]. CtBPs (C-terminal Binding Protein) were initially discovered as proteins binding to the C-terminal domain of adenovirus EA-1 . CtBPs have been described as co-repressors for many transcriptional repressors carrying a PxDLS or RRT protein motif [24, 25]. A possible function of AN as a co-repressor is the finding that micro-array experiments revealed many genes that are transcriptionally regulated by AN [2, 22]. CtBP/BARS were independently identified as Brefeldin A ADP ribosylated substrates (BARS) . A possible Golgi-related function is supported by the finding that CtBP can induce constriction in Golgi tubules  and membrane fission . In support of such a function AN was reported to act outside the nucleus .
Role of AN in SUB-mediated signal transduction
How does AN fit into the SUB-mediated signaling pathway? AN is unlikely to be a direct or indirect transcriptional target of SUB signaling. For example, SUB expression is only minimally altered in doq-1 flowers at various stages . In addition, a 35S::SUB transgene failed to rescue the phenotype of doq-1 mutants indicating that SUB is not directly regulated at the transcriptional level by AN. At the same time, AN expression was not found to differ between floral tissue of wild type, sub-1 and other slm mutants  (data not shown). These observations render it unlikely that AN and SUB regulate each other’s activity at the transcriptional level.
Subcellular localization of a functional SUB:EGFP fusion protein was found to be restricted to the plasma membrane [6, 7]. A functional AN:GFP fusion protein was recently reported to reside in the cytoplasm and in punctate compartments around the trans-Golgi network (TGN) . The TGN localization of AN led the authors to suggest a Golgi-related role for this protein, possibly in membrane trafficking. These results are compatible with at least two possibilities of how AN may fit into the SUB signaling mechanism. In the first scenario AN could mediate membrane trafficking of SUB, a view that is also indirectly supported by the finding that QKY encodes a putative membrane-localized protein thought to function in membrane-associated Ca2+- and phospholipid-dependent signaling . However, this model does not fit the data presented in this study as signal distribution of a functional SUB::SUB:EGFP reporter was found to be unaltered in doq-1 roots. In an alternative scenario, the cytoplasmic distribution of AN would allow its direct interaction with the intracellular domain of SUB.
We currently favor this notion as results from the yeast two-hybrid and in vitro pull-down assays suggest direct interaction between SUB and AN proteins at the plasma membrane. This interaction could then be necessary to control further downstream events of SUB signal transduction. AN is likely to mediate only some aspects of SUB signaling as there is a difference in the strength between for example the ovule phenotypes of sub and doq-1 mutants and stem twisting is nearly absent in doq-1 or an-2 (Figure 9). Moreover, there is only partial overlap in misexpressed genes between sub and doq-1 flowers . With respect to plant height AN appears to be part of the SUB mechanism that interacts with the LRR-RLK ER. It was proposed that ER and SUB signaling converge either at the level of the receptors or at some level more downstream in the mechanism . Thus, it will be interesting to resolve exactly how SUB, AN and ER relate to each other in future studies on SUB signaling.
In this study we showed that phenotypes of the slm mutant doq-1 and the trichome and leaf shape mutant an overlap. In addition, we showed that doq-1 is allelic to an. We further demonstrated that doq-1 is not an atypical an allele but that all tested an mutants show previously undescribed slm aspects. The data reveal a broader range of biological functions for AN than previously appreciated. Finally, our data reveal the possibility that SUB and AN interact directly. Taken together, the presented evidence suggests a role for AN in tissue morphogenesis mediated by the atypical receptor-like kinase SUB.
Plant work and genetics
The following Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. lines were used in this study: Columbia (Col-0) and Landsberg (erecta mutant) (Ler) wild-type strains, doq-1, an-1, an-2 , an-EM1, an-2 35S::YFP:AN. an-2 35S::YFP:AN plants were generated by cloning the CDS of the YFP:AN fusion into the pPAMPAT vector containing the 35S promoter (GenBank accession AY027531). Plasmid pKUT196 was described previously . Plant transformation was performed according to the floral dip method .
Plants were grown on soil at 24°C with 16 hours of light per day. The GL2:GUS line (Ler)  was introduced into an mutants by backcrosses. For GUS assays, plants were grown on MS plates for 4 days.
Using a Ler/Col mapping population doq-1 was localized to the upper end of chromosome 1 between markers F10O3(481D) and NF21M12 . Further mapping revealed an interval of 330.6 kb. The final Northern marker 96_(BccI) was located at chromosomal position 96771 (one recombinant left). 96_(BccI) is a CAPS marker which yields the following products after PCR with primers 96_(BccI)_F (GGGCTTTGATTTGATTGTGG) and 96_(BccI)_R (AAGAGAGGAGTGCAGCCAAA) and BccI digestion: Ler - 498 bp, Col - 254, 244 bp. The final Southern marker was NT7123 (chromosomal position: 427,343 bp, 3 recombinants left). NT7123 is a SSLP marker that, following PCR with primers NT7123_F (GTGTCCTTTTTTCTCAACGATG) and NT7123_R (CATGCACGTACGATTTGTTTAAC), yielded the following products on a 3.5% agarose gel: Ler , <199 bp; Col, 199 bp.
Yeast two-hybrid assay
The Matchmaker yeast two-hybrid system (Clontech) was employed and experimental procedures followed the manufacturer’s recommendations. The pACT-AN construct was described previously . For the generation of pGBKT7-SUBICD, the intracellular part of SUB coding sequence  was amplified from cDNA using primers SUBintra_F (CATGCCATGGATAACCGATATTACAGTG) and SUBintra_R (ATCGGTCGACAATAAACTATTGCTTCTG). The PCR product was digested with NcoI/SalI and cloned into NcoI/SalI digested pGBKT7. The R599C mutation was introduced into pGBKT7-SUBICD by the QuikChange II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Agilent Technologies) by using primers 35SsubR599Cf (AAGAAGCTCACTTGGAATGTATGTATAAATATTGCATTAGGAGCTTC) and 35SsubR599Cr (GAAGCTCCTAATGCAATATTTATACATACATTCCAAGTGAGCTTCTT). For the cloning of pGBKT7-SUBECD, the extracellular part of SUB coding sequence was amplified from cDNA using primers SUB Extra/Nde1_F (GCTCATATGACTAATCTACGAGATGTTTCGGCGA and SUB Extra/Xma1_R (TACCCGGGGTTGAGTGGACCAGAATTTTCCTGATC). The PCR product was digested with NdeI/XmaI and cloned into NdeI/XmaI digested pGBKT7. All PCR-based constructs were sequenced.
To assay possible interactions in yeast pGBKT7 plasmids containing SUBECD, SUBICD and SUBICD-R599C were cotransformed with pACT or pACT-AN into yeast strain AH109. Transformants were selected after 3 days on SC medium lacking Leu and Trp (−LW) at 30°C. To examine yeast two-hybrid interactions, the transformants were grown on solid SC medium lacking Leu and Trp (SC-LW) or Leu, Trp, and His (SC-LWH) at 30°C.
Generation of constructs for recombinant protein production
AN and SUB cDNA were cloned into gateway entry vector pDONR 201. The following primers were used for gateway cloning: for amplifying AN cDNA: GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCATGAGCAAGATCCGTTCG and GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTTAATCGATCCAACGTGTGATAC; for amplification of the full length SUB cDNA: GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCATGAGCT TTACAAGATGGGAAGTGT and GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTTAGATCATATGTTGA AGATCTTGG; for the amplification of the ICD version of SUB: GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCatgTATAACCGATATTACAGTGGAGC and GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTTAGATCAT ATGTTGAAGATCTTGG. AN cDNA was cloned into pGEX2TMGW (GE Healthcare) to generate an N-terminal fusion with Glutathion-S-Transferase (GST:AN) and the SUB and SUBICD cDNAs were cloned into pETG-40a (EMBL, Heidelberg) to generate an N-terminal fusion with maltose-binding protein (MBP:SUB, MBP:SUBICD).
To produce anti-AN antibody, AN was expressed as a GST-fusion protein in E.coli. The protein was purified and used to generate antibodies in rabbit (Pineda Antikörper-Service; Berlin, Germany). The antibody serum was affinity purified and checked for its specificity by MALDI-TOF analysis.
In vitro pull-down assay
Interactions between SUB and AN were studied using purified proteins that were expressed in bacteria. The bacterial cells BL21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIL containing the IPTG inducible constructs (MBP-Full length SUB, MBP-SUBICD and GST-AN) were grown at 37°C and 220 rpm to an OD 600 of 0.8-0.9 and then the cultures were induced by adding IPTG to final concentration of 1 mM. The induced cells were then grown further for 5 hours (at 37°C for GST-tagged AN constructs and 20°C for MBP-tagged constructs) and cells were harvested by centrifugation. Cells were lysed in Tris-lysis buffer (Tris (pH 7.5) 50 mM, NaCl (100 mM), EDTA (1 mM), EGTA (1 mM), NP-40 (1%), Lysozyme (200 μg/ml), DTT (1 mM), Protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma)) and sonicated three times for one minute each. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 4°C. MBP-tagged proteins were purified by incubation with amylose resin overnight at 4°C. After several washings, part of the resin was boiled with SDS-PAGE gel loading buffer to get purified protein for analysis. The remaining resin was used for incubation with equal amounts of GST:AN lysate for 4 hours at 4°C followed by several washings. Finally, the beads were boiled in SDS-PAGE gel loading buffer at 96°C for 10 min and equal amounts were loaded on a gel followed by western blotting. Detection was done using primary anti-AN antibody and secondary anti-rabbit antibody using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Scientific).
Histochemical analysis, microscopy and BFA treatments
Histochemical localization of ß-glucuronidase (GUS) activity in whole-mount tissues was performed as described previously . Scanning Electron Microscopy was made using a Quanta 250 FEG (FEI) microscope under low vacuum conditions without any fixation steps. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and BFA treatments were performed as reported previously .
We thank B. Ülker (MPIZ, Cologne) for providing the pAMPAT-GW vector and K. Torii for the pKUT196 plasmid. We also thank members of the Hülskamp and Schneitz labs for stimulating discussions. This work was funded through grants SCHN 723/6-1 and SFB924 (TP A2) from the German Research Council (DFG) to KS. YB was funded by the International Max Planck Research School “Molecular Basis of Plant Development and Environmental Interaction”. HB was funded by an IGSDHD fellowship.
- Chevalier D, Batoux M, Fulton L, Pfister K, Yadav RK, Schellenberg M, Schneitz K: STRUBBELIG defines a receptor kinase-mediated signaling pathway regulating organ development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 9074-9079. 10.1073/pnas.0503526102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fulton L, Batoux M, Vaddepalli P, Yadav RK, Busch W, Andersen SU, Jeong S, Lohmann JU, Schneitz K: DETORQUEO, QUIRKY, and ZERZAUST represent novel components involved in organ development mediated by the receptor-like kinase STRUBBELIG in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000355-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000355.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwak SH, Shen R, Schiefelbein J: Positional signaling mediated by a receptor-like kinase in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005, 307: 1111-1113. 10.1126/science.1105373.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwak SH, Schiefelbein J: The role of the SCRAMBLED receptor-like kinase in patterning the Arabidopsis root epidermis. Dev Biol. 2007, 302: 118-131. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yadav RK, Fulton L, Batoux M, Schneitz K: The Arabidopsis receptor-like kinase STRUBBELIG mediates inter-cell-layer signaling during floral development. Dev Biol. 2008, 323: 261-270. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.08.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaddepalli P, Fulton L, Batoux M, Yadav RK, Schneitz K: Structure-function analysis of STRUBBELIG, an Arabidopsis atypical receptor-like kinase involved in tissue morphogenesis. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19730-10.1371/journal.pone.0019730.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwak SH, Schiefelbein J: A feedback mechanism controlling SCRAMBLED receptor accumulation and cell-type pattern in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2008, 18: 1949-1954. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.064.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shiu S-H, Bleecker AB: Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 10763-10768. 10.1073/pnas.181141598.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eyüboglu B, Pfister K, Haberer G, Chevalier D, Fuchs A, Mayer KF, Schneitz K: Molecular characterisation of the STRUBBELIG-RECEPTOR FAMILY of genes encoding putative leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7: 16-10.1186/1471-2229-7-16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castells E, Casacuberta JM: Signalling through kinase-defective domains: the prevalence of atypical receptor-like kinases in plants. J Exp Bot. 2007, 58: 3503-3511. 10.1093/jxb/erm226.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gish LA, Clark SE: The RLK/Pelle family of kinases. Plant J. 2011, 66: 117-127. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04518.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Folkers U, Berger J, Hülskamp M: Cell morphogenesis of trichomes in Arabidopsis: differential control of primary and secondary branching by branch initiation regulators and cell growth. Development. 1997, 124: 3779-3786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hülskamp M, Misera S, Jürgens G: Genetic dissection of trichome cell development in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1994, 76: 555-566. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90118-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Redei GP: Single locus heterosis. Z Vererbungsl. 1962, 93: 164-170.Google Scholar
- Tsuge T, Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H: Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development. 1996, 122: 1589-1600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masucci JD, Rerie WG, Foreman DR, Zhang M, Galway ME, Marks MD, Schiefelbein JW: The homeobox gene GLABRA2 is required for position-dependent cell differentiation in the root epidermis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1996, 122: 1253-1260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanò S, Silletta MG, Colanzi A, Alberti S, Fiucci G, Valente C, Fusella A, Salmona M, Mironov A, Luini A, Corda D: Molecular cloning and functional characterization of brefeldin A-ADP-ribosylated substrate. A novel protein involved in the maintenance of the Golgi structure. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 17705-17710. 10.1074/jbc.274.25.17705.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torii KU, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Matsuura Y, Yokoyama R, Whittier RF, Komeda Y: The Arabidopsis ERECTA gene encodes a putative receptor protein kinase with extracellular leucine-rich repeats. Plant Cell. 1996, 8: 735-746.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Godiard L, Sauviac L, Torii KU, Grenon O, Mangin B, Grimsley NH, Marco Y: ERECTA, an LRR receptor-like kinase protein controlling development pleiotropically affects resistance to bacterial wilt. Plant J. 2003, 36: 353-365. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01877.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsukaya H, Tsuge T, Uchimiya H: The cotyledon: a superior system for studies of leaf development. Planta. 1994, 195: 309-312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Folkers U, Kirik V, Schobinger U, Falk S, Krishnakumar S, Pollock MA, Oppenheimer DG, Day I, Reddy AS, Jürgens G, Hülskamp M: The cell morphogenesis gene ANGUSTIFOLIA encodes a CtBP/BARS-like protein and is involved in the control of the microtubule cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1280-1288. 10.1093/emboj/21.6.1280.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim GT, Shoda K, Tsuge T, Cho KH, Uchimiya H, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K, Tsukaya H: The ANGUSTIFOLIA gene of Arabidopsis, a plant CtBP gene, regulates leaf-cell expansion, the arrangement of cortical microtubules in leaf cells and expression of a gene involved in cell-wall formation. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1267-1279. 10.1093/emboj/21.6.1267.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyd JM, Subramanian T, Schaeper U, La Regina M, Bayley S, Chinnadurai G: A region in the C-terminus of adenovirus 2/5 E1a protein is required for association with a cellular phosphoprotein and important for the negative modulation of T24-ras mediated transformation, tumorigenesis and metastasis. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 469-478.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chinnadurai G: CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. Mol Cell. 2002, 9: 213-224. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00443-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quinlan KG, Nardini M, Verger A, Francescato P, Yaswen P, Corda D, Bolognesi M, Crossley M: Specific recognition of ZNF217 and other zinc finger proteins at a surface groove of C-terminal binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 8159-8172. 10.1128/MCB.00680-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weigert R, Silletta MG, Spano S, Turacchio G, Cericola C, Colanzi A, Senatore S, Mancini R, Polishchuk EV, Salmona M, Facchiano F, Burger KN, Mironov A, Luini A, Corda D: CtBP/BARS induces fission of Golgi membranes by acylating lysophosphatidic acid. Nature. 1999, 402: 429-433. 10.1038/46587.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonazzi M, Spano S, Turacchio G, Cericola C, Valente C, Colanzi A, Kweon HS, Hsu VW, Polishchuck EV, Polishchuck RS, Sallese M, Pulvirenti T, Corda D, Luini A: CtBP3/BARS drives membrane fission in dynamin-independent transport pathways. Nat Cell Biol. 2005, 7: 570-580. 10.1038/ncb1260.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Minamisawa N, Sato M, Cho KH, Ueno H, Takechi K, Kajikawa M, Yamato KT, Ohyama K, Toyooka K, Kim GT, Horiguchi G, Takano H, Ueda T, Tsukaya H: ANGUSTIFOLIA, a plant homolog of CtBP/BARS, functions outside the nucleus. Plant J. 2011, 68: 788-799. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04731.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clough SJ, Bent AF: Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16: 735-743. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar