miRNA regulation in the early development of barley seed
© Curaba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 27 February 2012
Accepted: 17 July 2012
Published: 28 July 2012
During the early stages of seed development many genes are under dynamic regulation to ensure the proper differentiation and establishment of the tissue that will constitute the mature grain. To investigate how miRNA regulation contributes to this process in barley, a combination of small RNA and mRNA degradome analyses were used to identify miRNAs and their targets.
Our analysis identified 84 known miRNAs and 7 new miRNAs together with 96 putative miRNA target genes regulated through a slicing mechanism in grain tissues during the first 15 days post anthesis. We also identified many potential miRNAs including several belonging to known miRNA families. Our data gave us evidence for an increase in miRNA-mediated regulation during the transition between pre-storage and storage phases. Potential miRNA targets were found in various signalling pathways including components of four phytohormone pathways (ABA, GA, auxin, ethylene) and the defence response to powdery mildew infection. Among the putative miRNA targets we identified were two essential genes controlling the GA response, a GA3oxidase1 and a homolog of the receptor GID1, and a homolog of the ACC oxidase which catalyses the last step of ethylene biosynthesis. We found that two MLA genes are potentially miRNA regulated, establishing a direct link between miRNAs and the R gene response.
Our dataset provides a useful source of information on miRNA regulation during the early development of cereal grains and our analysis suggests that miRNAs contribute to the control of development of the cereal grain, notably through the regulation of phytohormone response pathways.
KeywordsmicroRNA Barley Grain development Plant hormones Disease resistance Small RNA sequencing mRNA degradome PARE
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding small RNAs (smRNAs) that act to reduce expression of target genes by interacting with their target mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner. Since their discovery it has become clear that miRNAs are an important component in the regulation of many genes in most eukaryotic cells. In plants, most currently validated miRNA targets code for transcription factor families with crucial developmental functions, including the control of root and shoot architecture, vegetative to reproductive phase transitions and leaf and flower morphogenesis [1, 2].
miRNAs are processed from a primary miRNA transcript which folds to form an imperfect stem-loop. The pri-miRNA hairpin is recognised and processed to a smRNA duplex consisting of the miRNA and complementary miRNA* by a protein complex containing a DCL1-type RNase. The mature miRNA, which is typically 20–21 nt in length, is then incorporated into the RNA Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) to regulate one or more target genes in trans through a base pairing mechanism. Most plant miRNAs appear to trigger both mRNA cleavage (between the nucleotides matching the 10th and 11th position of the miRNA) and translational repression of their target genes . Although these two mechanisms are additive, they can be dissociated when slicing activity is disabled by a mis-pairing in the central region between the miRNA and its target [4–7]. In plants, the high level of complementarity between the miRNAs and their targets suggests slicing is the predominant mode of action of miRNAs . Alternatively, miRNAs can regulate their target indirectly through the production of trans-acting short interfering RNAs (tasiRNAs) [8, 9]. tasiRNAs are synthesised from a non-coding mRNA that is processed to phased 21 nt smRNAs by a miRNA triggered process. Like miRNAs, tasiRNAs can regulate multiple target genes through a slicing mechanism.
The number of annotated miRNAs in miRBase has exponentially increased in the last decade . The earliest group of miRNAs were identified in silico using algorithms to predict stem-loop precursors and targets present in the genome and/or EST databases [11–15]. Subsequent developments in high throughput sequencing made it possible to identify miRNAs based on sequencing of smRNA libraries in a wide range of species. Schreiber et al. identified 100 miRNAs, including 44 new miRNAs, from barley leaves using short-read sequence data. A major challenge of sequencing based approaches is to identify the miRNAs amongst a smRNA population mostly composed of short-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) . Distinguishing these two major smRNA classes relies principally on identifying their origin. An siRNA locus produces several overlapping siRNAs, whereas the pri-miRNA encoded by a MIR gene usually produces one miRNA from an imperfect RNA hairpin . Additional criteria can also help classify a smRNA, such as its length and mode of action. Most miRNAs and tasiRNAs are 21 nt in length and post-transcriptionally regulate their target genes in trans, whereas the vast majority of the 24 nt smRNAs correspond to cis-acting siRNAs (casiRNAs) that regulate the transcription of their own locus of origin through a DNA methylation based mechanism.
miRNA targets are often validated using a modified 5’RACE technique to detect the products of miRNA-mediated cleavage . For most currently annotated miRNA targets, cleavage has not been verified and therefore the function of the corresponding miRNA in vivo has not been established. Recently, techniques which combine 5’RACE and high throughput sequencing (Parallel Analysis of RNA Ends (PARE) and equivalent methods [20–22]), have been used to simultaneously validate all sliced miRNA targets in a given RNA extract. Such an approach has been successfully carried out in Arabidopsis, rice, soybean, grapevine, citrus and medicago [23–28]. However, identifying a miRNA regulation is dependent on examining the appropriate tissue and developmental stage. As miRNAs are predominantly post-transcriptional regulators [29, 30], the impact of their regulation depends on the overlap of their spatio-temporal expression with that of their target genes [1, 2]. miRNAs from the same family can potentially have different functions depending on their expression profile, as suggested for members of the miR169 and miR171 families that differentially accumulate in response to abiotic stress in rice [31, 32].
Despite the growing knowledge of miRNA functions in plants, only the functions of highly conserved miRNAs have been investigated in crop species. Perhaps the best characterized miRNAs in cereals are miR156 and miR172 which regulate SPL (Squamosa Promoter-binding protein-Like) and AP2-like genes, respectively. miR156 controls shoot branching in rice and maize [33–35] and miR172 regulates floral organ identity in rice, maize and barley [36–41]. In maize, miR172 accumulation is affected by miR156 and both miRNAs are involved in the regulation of the juvenile to adult phase transition . In contrast to the highly conserved miRNAs, the majority of the newly discovered miRNAs are weakly expressed and only found in closely related species, suggesting that they have recently evolved and could contribute to determining species-specific traits.
Barley is the fourth most cultivated crop worldwide; its grains are used for both human consumption and livestock feed. From anthesis, it takes approximately 40 days to form a mature grain composed of 3 principal tissues: the embryo, the endosperm (starchy endosperm and aleurone layers), and the outside layer (seed coat and pericarp). The development of the grain can be divided in three principal stages based on morphological changes, metabolite accumulation and transcriptome analysis: pre-storage, storage (or maturation) and desiccation [42–45]. The pre-storage phase, which corresponds to the first 5 Days Post Anthesis (DPA), is characterized by extensive mitotic activity in both embryo and endosperm. The transition to the storage phase, roughly between 5 and 10 DPA, can be considered as an intermediate stage characterized by dramatic transcriptional changes in order to mobilize energy resources and initiate the differentiation of the tissues that will constitute the mature grain. Throughout the maturation phase, which lasts up to ~25 DPA, aleurone and embryonic tissues acquire desiccation tolerance whereas the endosperm cells undergo endoreduplication and accumulate storage metabolites (mainly starch and proteins) .
In this study we investigated the miRNA-mediated gene regulation that takes place during the growth of the barley grain. Since the early stages of development play a key role in determining grain quality characteristics, we focused on the pre-storage and early storage phases (0–15 DPA). From analysis of smRNA and degradome libraries, 96 genes regulated by miRNA-mediated cleavage were identified including transcription factors, kinases, oxidoreductases, hydrolases, transferases, receptors and transporters. Our data suggest that miRNAs contribute widely to the control of development of the cereal grain, notably through the regulation of phytohormone response pathways.
Results and discussion
Diversity of the small-RNA population in early grain development
Composition of the smRNA libraries
Previously identified miRNAs present in barley grain
New miRNAs identified based on the presence of their precursor
miRNA precursors and corresponding known and new miRNAs
miRNA sequence (5’-3’)
Identification of potential miRNA targets using the degradome libraries
The 84 known and 7 new miRNAs identified in this study account for only 1 % of the unique 21 nt signatures in the smRNA sequence dataset, suggesting that these analyses did not identify all the miRNAs present. An alternative approach to identify the presence of a miRNA is to detect its post-transcriptional regulatory activity on a target gene. In plants, most miRNAs characterised to date show slicing activity on their target, hence degradome analysis was carried out using the Parallel Analysis of RNA Ends (PARE) technique , constructing libraries from samples A, B and C as used for the smRNA libraries (Figure 1). We reasoned that having smRNA and degradome libraries from the same sets of samples would allow us to follow the miRNA regulation of target genes and increase the likelihood of detecting a cleavage that occurs at a particular developmental stage.
Composition of the mRNA degradome libraries
20-21 nt pooled
Distribution of the potential miRNA targets by categories
Targets of pot-miRNAs
Targets of new miRNAs
Targets of known miRNAs
The degradome analysis revealed that most miRNAs target only one EST with a smaller group targeting 2 to 4 different ESTs, which are usually members of the same gene family, (e.g. ARFs, CBFs and SPLs; Additional file 4). This is in contrast to an average of 10 ESTs bioinformatically predicted as targets for each miRNA (data not shown). One obvious reason for not detecting target mRNA cleavage is that expression of the miRNA and mRNA may not overlap. Published microarray data [45, 52] shows that a majority of the genes predicted to be regulated by a slicing mechanism are expressed during seed development (data not shown) however this does not preclude the non-overlapping expression of miRNA and target in the same cell types. In addition we found four sliced targets in our dataset that were predicted to be regulated through a translational repression mechanism only (Additional file 4). Our observations suggest that there are inadequacies in the algorithms currently used to predict miRNA targets, hence experimental verification is required to confirm these predictions in planta.
miRNA regulation during seed development
Potential miRNA target genes regulated during barley seed development
smRNAs with perfect offset
0.E + 00
CBF (NF-YA2 homolog)
CBF (NF-YA5 homolog)
CBF (NF-YA9 homolog)
0.E + 00
Carbonic anhydrase, chloro.
Chlorophyll a-b binding prot.
GA 3-oxidase 1
0.E + 00
Perhaps the best known function of the miRNA pathway is to control the cell fate through the regulation of transcription factor coding genes. We validated 11 conserved targets of six known miRNA families which code for transcription factors known to control key steps in plant development: miR156-SPL (2 genes), miR159-Myb, miR164-NAC, miR167-ARF (potentially 3 genes sharing the same degradome peak), miR169-CBF (3 genes) and miR172-AP2like (Table 5). We also found evidence for miRNA regulation of the DOF (DNA binding with one finger) plant specific transcription factor family. Its expression seems to be restricted to the early development of the grain since degradation products were observed only during stage A (Table 5). DOFs are plant specific transcription factors known to play a critical role in growth and development . In maize and finger millet, DOF proteins are thought to be involved in carbon metabolism and the accumulation of storage proteins [54, 55]. In rice, RPBF (rice prolamin box binding factor) which contains a DOF domain, was shown to be involved in the regulation of endosperm expressed genes .
The early development of the seed is associated with an elevated metabolic activity limited by energetic resources. Photosynthesis related genes are mainly expressed during the first 5 DPA within the pericarp tissue . Four of the potential miRNA targets (encoding a ferredoxin, a chlorophyll a/b binding protein, a carbonic anhydrase and a ribonuclear protein) are likely to be involved in chloroplast function. An EST coding for a PGlcT (Plastidic GlucoseTranslocator) homolog is also cleaved by a pot-miRNA during the early development of the grain. PGlcT is involved in the export of stored starch into the cytoplasm at night . The level of PGlcT degradation products in our dataset increases during grain development (Table 5) which correlates with a previous observation in rice that expression of a PGlcT homolog gene increases in the endosperm during the first 15 DPA .
The control of seed development involves a cross-talk between three key phytohormones: ABA, GA and auxin, which are tightly linked to the master regulators LEC1/AFL (LEC1: Leafy Cotyledon1 and AFL - referring to B3 domain factors: ABI3, FUS3 and LEC2) that govern many seed-specific traits, such as embryogenesis, grain filling, desiccation tolerance, and dormancy induction [59–62].
Auxin concentration together with other local factors, contributes to cell differentiation and specification of cell fate [63, 64] and is known to be involved in embryo patterning . In Arabidopsis, the auxin signal is tightly linked to the miRNA pathway, with four conserved miRNA families (miR160, miR167, miR390 and miR393) regulating the auxin receptor TIR1 (Transport Inhibitor Response1) and different subgroups of ARF (Auxin Response Factor) genes [9, 66–71]. We identified a TIR1 homolog and 7 ARF genes potentially regulated by miRNAs and tasiRNAs during seed development (Table 5). Our data shows that in the barley grain the regulation of TIR1 and potentially 3 ARF genes (the same degradome peak matches three distinct ESTs) by the miR393 and miR167 families is conserved. We noticed that hvu-miR167a and d, which are the highest expressed members in this family, show a reciprocal accumulation pattern which could suggest they are expressed in different tissues where they differentially regulate the same target genes (Additional file 4). We also identified smRNAs homologous to the tasiR-ARFs which regulate four ARFs (ARF 4/5/6/7). The accumulation of these smRNAs correlates with hvu-miR390 which gradually decreases in abundance from stage A to C (Table 5, Additional file 2), suggesting that, as in Arabidopsis, the production of the tasiR-ARFs requires miR390-mediated cleavage.
The antagonistic role of GA and ABA in the control of the switch between dormancy and germination is a well known mechanism; however the function of these hormones during the early stages of seed development remains unclear. Our data suggest that there is miRNA regulation of ABA and GA signalling during the early stages of grain development, with degradome analysis identifying two ABA-Insensitive homolog genes (ABI3 and ABI8), a GA3oxidase1 and a homolog of the GA receptor GID1 (Gibberellin Insensitive Dwarf1) as targets of miRNAs or pot-miRNAs (Table 5). ABI3 is cleaved with a perfect offset by 2 members of the grass specific miRNA family hvu-miR516. Degradation products of ABI3 only accumulate during stage C whereas the corresponding miRNAs are expressed earlier. In contrast, the cleavage of GID1 mostly occurs during early stages while the cognate pot-miRNAs accumulate in later stages. This suggests that in both cases the miRNAs could act to prevent leakage in target gene expression, ensuring that GID1 function is restricted to early stages and ABI3 to later stages. These data support the current belief that GA is required during early embryogenesis but its function is repressed in later phases when a higher ABA/GA balance is needed for the proper maturation of the grain. This also correlates with the observation that the late presence of GA may inhibit embryogenic cell differentiation .
Our data also suggest that there is miRNA regulation of ethylene responses with an ACC oxidase homolog cleaved by a pot-miRNA during the early maturation phase. Along with ABA, ethylene is thought to play a major role in the development of the endosperm by affecting grain filling and the timing of programmed cell death (PCD) [44, 46].
Plants recognize many pathogens through the action of a diverse family of R genes, whose protein products are necessary for the direct or indirect recognition of pathogen avirulence (avr) proteins in order to initiate the defence response. In addition to their role in defence responses, R genes may be involved in the regulation of developmental processes in Arabidopsis and rice [73, 74].
In barley, the R gene MLA10 acts as a receptor of fungal infection by recognising avirulence proteins and confers resistance against the powdery mildew fungus [75, 76]. In wheat the expression of several miRNAs is responsive to powdery mildew infection, suggesting that the miRNA pathway could be involved in triggering the defence response [77, 78]. Our degradome analysis indicates that two HvMLA genes homologous to the rice MLA1 and MLA10 genes are cleaved by miRNAs or pot-miRNAs (Table 5).
Further investigation of OsMLA10-like and GA3oxidase1 regulation
The impact of regulation by a miRNA depends on the relative spatio-temporal accumulation of the miRNA and the target mRNA. In this study, we focused on investigating miRNA regulation at three consecutive stages of grain development. Since the tissues that will constitute the mature grain are not formed during the early stages, we used the whole caryopsis to be able to compare the abundance of the mature miRNAs and the degradation of their targets between the samples. Consequently, further investigation of the function of a miRNA cleavage identified in our analysis requires further assessment of the tissue specificity of both miRNA and target mRNA expression.
The data we have generated provides a comprehensive source of information about the timing of miRNA regulation during grain development. Regulation by miRNAs peaks during the transition phase (5–10 DPA) which correlates with the timing of a major change in transcript profiles. The 96 potential miRNA target genes we identified are predicted to be involved in various functions including photosynthesis, carbohydrate translocation, phytohormone signalling, cell differentiation and defence response. Our data suggest an upstream function of the miRNAs in coordinating tissue specification and energy mobilization to ensure proper growth and development of the grain.
As increasing amounts of genome sequence data become available our data can be re-examined to identify more miRNA precursors and refine the predictions of which genes are under miRNA regulation. The analysis of the biological roles of miRNAs in cereals currently depends on transgenic approaches; however the identification of miRNA resistant target mRNAs that give rise to altered phenotypes in rice and barley [34, 35, 38] suggests that the use of high-throughput methods to identify sequence changes leading to miRNA-resistant targets will allow assessment of the roles of other miRNAs.
Barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants were grown in naturally lit phytotron glasshouses with air temperature set at 17°C/9°C day/night cycle. The plants were grown from October to December when the time of anthesis was determined for each head based on the dissection of the middle spikelet. Immature grains were harvested from the middle six rows of the head at 1 to 15 Days Post Anthesis (DPA). Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of seeds from each DPA (which correspond to ~50 seeds at 1 DPA and 2 seed at 15 DPA) using the following method. Whole caryopsis was ground in a mortar using liquid nitrogen. 1.2 mL of NTES buffer [NaCL 100 mM, Tris-pH8.0, 10 mM, EDTA 1 mM, 1%(w/v) SDS] and 1.6 mL of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol [25:24:1] were added in the mortar and grinding continued until tissue was thawed. The extract was centrifuged 5 min at 12,000 rpm. The supernatant was precipitated by adding 1/10 vol of 3 M NaOAc and 2.5 vol of 100% ethanol and incubating at −20°C overnight. The extract was centrifuged 20 min at 4°C and 12,000 rpm. The pellet was washed in 75% ethanol, centrifuged 5 min at maximum speed, dried for 1 min at room temperature and resuspended into 50 μl of RNAse-free water. Samples were DNase treated using RQ1 DNase from Promega for 20 min at 37°C followed by a phenol:chloroform extraction and a second ethanol precipitation. Total RNA extracts were resuspended into 50 μL of RNAse-free water and the quality was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and agarose gel electrophoresis. An equal quantity of each RNA extract was pooled to constitute the following three samples: A (RNA extracts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 DPA), B (RNA extracts 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 DPA), and C (RNA extracts 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 DPA).
Construction and analysis of smRNA libraries
To determine the smRNA populations present in samples A, B and C, 60 μg of total RNAs were used to prepare libraries for Illumina sequencing (http://www.geneworks.com.au). A custom script was used to trim reads of 3’ adapter sequences and then to pool identical reads to create a non-redundant sequences (=signatures) list. Sequences that were over 50% homopolymer or dinucleotide repeat were filtered out. Read counts for each sequence were normalised to reads per million of total sequenced (RPM). The diversity of the signatures present in the three libraries had a high number of singletons, over 80% (Table 1). To facilitate the analysis and build a level of confidence from the sequences cloned in the libraries, signatures were only considered that were 18 to 25 nucleotides in length and with a minimum expression of 1 RPM, representing 137,614 smRNAs. For identification of previously known miRNAs, signatures were checked for an exact match (in sequence and length) to a known miRNA present in miRBase  or recently in barley leaves . To identify new miRNAs, the signatures of 19 to 23 nucleotides in length were kept and aligned to the HarvEST unigene set (release-21, http://www.harvest-web.org/) using SOAP . Signatures with no more than 20 matching unigenes and with no match to a smear of overlapping smRNA sequences were kept. For near identical sequences aligning to the same location (for example, differing in length by a base or being offset by a base) only the sequence with the highest read count was retained. The miRNA precursors were searched by extracting the unigene sequence surrounding the aligned smRNAs and testing their potential to form a hairpin secondary structure using Vienna RNALFold (http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~ivo/RNA/). The smRNA signature was required to have no more than 4 mismatches against the complementary sequence in the hairpin structure and no more than 2 bulges. Considering that MIR genes may originate from the evolution of an inverted repeat element that initially can produce endogenous 24 nt-siRNAs [80, 81], we kept the precursors sharing less than 70% homology within the pre-miRNA region to repeat elements in the Plant Repeat Databases . smRNA which could be found in a stem of a potential miRNA precursor-like hairpin structure in the folded sequences were marked as new miRNAs. For the downstream analysis of miRNA target genes, the remaining 19–23 nt signatures with no more than 90% homology to a repeat element were kept (Plant Repeat Databases , Figure 1).
Construction and analysis of degradome libraries
The mRNA degradome libraries were made as described by German et al. using total RNA extract from the 3 samples A, B and C. In brief, for each sample, 200 μg of total RNA was used to purify messenger RNA using an mRNA purification kit (Stratagene #400806). A 5’-adaptor (5′-GUUCAGAGUUCUACAGUCCGAC-3′) was linked to the mRNA 5’CAP-less fragments and purified again using the mRNA purification kit. After reverse transcription using the RT-primer (5'-CGAGCACAGAATTAATACGACTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTV-3'), the cDNAs were amplified through 7 PCR cycles using the primers P1 (5'-GTTCAGAGTTCTACAGTCCGAC-3') and P2 (5'-CGAGCACAGAATTAATACGACT-3'). Amplicons were digested by MmeI (New England Biolabs, #R0637S) and dephosphorylated by Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase treatment (Roche #11758250001). Samples were run on a 12% polyacrylamide gel and the MmeI cleaved fragments corresponding to the 42 bp gel band were purified. Purified Products were ligated to a double stranded DNA adaptor (5'-P-TCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG-3' + 3'-NNAGCATACGGCAGAAGACGAAC-5') and purified on a second 12% polyacrylamide gel by extracting the 63 bp gel band. The DNA fragments were amplified by 21 PCR cycles using the primers P3 (5'-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTT-CAGAGTTCTACAGTCCGA-3') and P4 (5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA-3'), and purified again on 12 % polyacrylamide gel by excising the 86 bp band. The purified amplicons, which constitute the degradome libraries, were sequenced using the Illumina platform.
As for the small RNA analysis, reads were trimmed, reduced to a non-redundant set, filtered for repetitive sequence and their read counts were normalised in read per million (RPM). For subsequent analysis, sequences of 21 nt in length were trimmed back to 20 nt, then only sequences of 20 nt in length and having at least 1 RPM were retained. Kanga (http://code.google.com/p/biokanga/) was used to align the 20 nt signatures to the HarvEST unigene sequences (release-21, http://www.harvest-web.org/). No mismatches were allowed in the alignment. For each matching EST the number of aligned degradome sequences at each position along the EST was investigated to identify signature peaks (Figure 5). Positions for which the number of aligned sequences exceeded the mean plus two standard deviations for a sample along an EST were retained. From each of these retained signature peaks, a 32 nt sequence was extracted from the EST, centred around the 5' end of the aligned signature, to constitute the Target Signature Sequence (TSS). To identify the smRNAs that could potentially bind to a TSS we used psRNAtarget (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget). We ran the known miRNAs, new miRNAs and 19–23 nt smRNAs against the TSS with a maximum expectation of 5 and an hspsize (which is the length of the region used to score the complementarity between the miRNA and its target) equal to the length of the smRNA (to ensure that the entire sequence of the smRNA is considered by the scoring algorithm). We indicated the offset between the predicted cleavage site of the smRNA (position 10-11nt of the smRNA) and the detected cleavage site (center of the TSS, Figure 5), using the formula: offset = detected cleavage position on the EST - predicted cleavage position on the EST. For each TSS, we kept all smRNAs in a −3/+3 offset window. Since the smRNAs with a common 3’ end binding position on the EST share the same predicted cleavage site we considered them as one group and categorized the targets according to the offset distribution of these smRNA groups (Table 4). We categorized the targets as follows: category-I; the ESTs targeted by a unique smRNA group with a perfect offset (considered as unique when the smRNA group represented more than 97% of the total number of smRNAs predicted to bind to the TSS), category-II; the ESTs targeted by a majority of smRNAs with a perfect offset and category-III; the remaining ESTs targeted by a minority of smRNAs with a perfect offset.
RT-PCR reactions were performed as previously described . In brief, first-strand cDNA was synthesized using oligo(dT) primers and Super-Script III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). PCR reactions were performed on an AB 7900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). 1.0 μL of 1:10 diluted template cDNA was used in a 10 μL reaction. The amplification program was: 1 cycle of 15" at 95°C, 35 cycles 15" at 95°C, 30" at 60°C, 30" at 72°C, and then followed by a thermal denaturing step. All primers pairs of the tested genes showed a similar amplification efficiency to the one used for the ACTIN gene which was used as reference. Relative transcript levels of biosynthesis were calculated with the ΔΔCt method (Applied Biosystems). Forward and Reverse primers: HvDCL1a F (AGAAGCCTTGACTGCTGCAT) and R (ATCAATTTCGCCCTCCTCTT); HvDCL1b F (GCCCCAAAAGTGCTATCTGA) and R (GCCCCGACATCTCCTTTAGT); HvDCL1c F (CGGCAGAAACAATTGATGAG) and R (CAAAGCTTCCTGTTGCACTG); GA3ox1 F (GCACTACCGCCACTTCTCTG) and R (CTCTCGGTGAGGTTGTGCTC); OsMLA10-like F (ATAAGATACGTCGTCTGTCCATG) and R (TCCAACACCCGCAGAGCATG).
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA (40 μg) was separated on a denaturing 15% polyacryamide gel containing 7 M urea at 120 V for 2 hr. RNA was electrophoretically transferred to Zeta-probe GT membranes (BioRad) at 40 V for 90 min and fixed by UV crosslinking. Membranes were incubated in hybridization buffer [Na2PO4-pH7.2 125 mM, NaCl 250 mM, 7%(w/v) SDS, 50%(v/v) formamide] for 4 h at 42°C and then incubated in the presence of 32P-end-labeled oligonucleotide probes at 42°C overnight. Membranes were washed in [2X SSC, 0.2% SDS] at 42°C and radioactivity was detected using a Phosphorimager. Oligonucleotide probes: miR164-AS (5’-TGCACGTGCCCTGCTTCTCCA-3’), miR168-AS (5’-GTCCCGATCTGCACCAAGCGA-3’), miR390-AS (5’-GGCGCTATCCCTCCTGAGCTT-3’), miR-MLA10-AS (5’-GGTCCATGATATGATGCTTGA-3’), miR-GA3ox1-AS (5’-TCCACTGAGCTACAGGCGC-3’).
RNA ligase-mediated 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RLM 5′-RACE) was performed using the GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen). The manufacturer’s protocol for 5’end analysis was followed with the exception of the 5’ de-capping step. In brief, total RNA was isolated from whole caryopsis tissues at 6–10 DPA and ligated to a 5’end RNA adaptor before being reverse transcribed using an oligo(dT) primer. The PCR reactions were performed using the following gene specific reverse primers: U21_3667-R (GGGGACTGCATGTACGGATC), U21_18637-R (GAGACGGTGCCGGTGGAAGCCT) and U21_9757-R (AGACATGCTCGGCACCACCTCACCA).
The small RNA and degradome sequence datasets have been deposited in the NCBI GEO database, accession GSE38755.
Parallel analysis of RNA ends
Rapid amplification of RNA ends
The authors would like to thank Professor Pam Green, Dr Dong-Hoon Jeong and Dr Sunhee Park (University of Delaware) for assistance in preparing the PARE libraries. We thank Sue Allen, Anna Wielopolska and Kerry Ramm for excellent technical assistance. JC was funded by an OCE Postdoctoral Fellowship (CSIRO). Sequencing was partly funded by a Bio-Analytical Services grant from BioPlatforms Australia.
- Chen X: Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009, 25: 21-44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voinnet O: Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell. 2009, 136: 669-687.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, Sieburth L, Voinnet O: Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science. 2008, 320: 1185-1190.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aukerman MJ, Sakai H: Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a MicroRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 2730-2741.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen X: A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science. 2004, 303: 2022-2025.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gandikota M, Birkenbihl RP, Hohmann S, Cardon GH, Saedler H, Huijser P: The miRNA156/157 recognition element in the 3' UTR of the Arabidopsis SBP box gene SPL3 prevents early flowering by translational inhibition in seedlings. Plant J. 2007, 49: 683-693.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP: Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002, 110: 513-520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peragine A, Yoshikawa M, Wu G, Albrecht HL, Poethig RS: SGS3 and SGS2/SDE1/RDR6 are required for juvenile development and the production of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 2368-2379.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vazquez F, Vaucheret H, Rajagopalan R, Lepers C, Gasciolli V, Mallory AC, Hilbert JL, Bartel DP, Crete P: Endogenous trans-acting siRNAs regulate the accumulation of Arabidopsis mRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004, 16: 69-79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S: miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: D152-D157.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adai A, Johnson C, Mlotshwa S, Archer-Evans S, Manocha V, Vance V, Sundaresan V: Computational prediction of miRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2005, 15: 78-91.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP: Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol Cell. 2004, 14: 787-799.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindow M, Jacobsen A, Nygaard S, Mang Y, Krogh A: Intragenomic matching reveals a huge potential for miRNA-mediated regulation in plants. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007, 3: e238-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindow M, Krogh A: Computational evidence for hundreds of non-conserved plant microRNAs. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 119-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D: Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell. 2005, 8: 517-527.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schreiber AW, Shi BJ, Huang CY, Langridge P, Baumann U: Discovery of barley miRNAs through deep sequencing of short reads. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 129-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghildiyal M, Zamore PD: Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 94-108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyers BC, Axtell MJ, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Baulcombe D, Bowman JL, Cao X, Carrington JC, Chen X, Green PJ, et al: Criteria for annotation of plant MicroRNAs. Plant Cell. 2008, 20: 3186-3190.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC: Cleavage of Scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science. 2002, 297: 2053-2056.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ: Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol. 2008, 18: 758-762.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- German MA, Pillay M, Jeong DH, Hetawal A, Luo S, Janardhanan P, Kannan V, Rymarquis LA, Nobuta K, German R, et al: Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. Nat Biotechnol. 2008, 26: 941-946.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gregory BD, O'Malley RC, Lister R, Urich MA, Tonti-Filippini J, Chen H, Millar AH, Ecker JR: A link between RNA metabolism and silencing affecting Arabidopsis development. Dev Cell. 2008, 14: 854-866.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li YF, Zheng Y, Addo-Quaye C, Zhang L, Saini A, Jagadeeswaran G, Axtell MJ, Zhang W, Sunkar R: Transcriptome-wide identification of microRNA targets in rice. Plant J. 2010, 62: 742-759.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pantaleo V, Szittya G, Moxon S, Miozzi L, Moulton V, Dalmay T, Burgyan J: Identification of grapevine microRNAs and their targets using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Plant J. 2010, 62: 960-976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song QX, Liu YF, Hu XY, Zhang WK, Ma B, Chen SY, Zhang JS: Identification of miRNAs and their target genes in developing soybean seeds by deep sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11: 5-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JZ, Ai XY, Guo WW, Peng SA, Deng XX, Hu CG: Identification of miRNAs and Their Target Genes Using Deep Sequencing and Degradome Analysis in Trifoliate Orange [Poncirus trifoliate (L.) Raf]. Mol Biotechnol. 2012, 51: 44-57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou M, Gu L, Li P, Song X, Wei L, Chen Z, Cao X: Degradome sequencing reveals endogenous small RNA targets in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Front Biol. 2010, 5: 24-Google Scholar
- Zhou ZS, Zeng HQ, Liu ZP, Yang ZM: Genome-wide identification of Medicago truncatula microRNAs and their targets reveals their differential regulation by heavy metal. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 51: 44-57.Google Scholar
- Alvarez JP, Pekker I, Goldshmidt A, Blum E, Amsellem Z, Eshed Y: Endogenous and synthetic microRNAs stimulate simultaneous, efficient, and localized regulation of multiple targets in diverse species. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 1134-1151.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tretter EM, Alvarez JP, Eshed Y, Bowman JL: Activity range of Arabidopsis small RNAs derived from different biogenesis pathways. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147: 58-62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lv DK, Bai X, Li Y, Ding XD, Ge Y, Cai H, Ji W, Wu N, Zhu YM: Profiling of cold-stress-responsive miRNAs in rice by microarrays. Gene. 2010, 459: 39-47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao B, Liang R, Ge L, Li W, Xiao H, Lin H, Ruan K, Jin Y: Identification of drought-induced microRNAs in rice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 354: 585-590.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chuck G, Meeley R, Irish E, Sakai H, Hake S: The maize tasselseed4 microRNA controls sex determination and meristem cell fate by targeting Tasselseed6/indeterminate spikelet1. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1517-1521.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiao Y, Wang Y, Xue D, Wang J, Yan M, Liu G, Dong G, Zeng D, Lu Z, Zhu X, et al: Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 541-544.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song XJ, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M: OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 545-549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chuck G, Cigan AM, Saeteurn K, Hake S: The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 544-549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lauter N, Kampani A, Carlson S, Goebel M, Moose SP: microRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 9412-9417.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nair SK, Wang N, Turuspekov Y, Pourkheirandish M, Sinsuwongwat S, Chen G, Sameri M, Tagiri A, Honda I, Watanabe Y, et al: Cleistogamous flowering in barley arises from the suppression of microRNA-guided HvAP2 mRNA cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 490-495.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu QH, Helliwell CA: Regulation of flowering time and floral patterning by miR172. J Exp Bot. 2011, 62: 487-495.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu QH, Upadhyaya NM, Gubler F, Helliwell CA: Over-expression of miR172 causes loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9: 149-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown RH, Bregitzer P: A Ds insertional mutant of a barley miR172 gene results in indeterminate spikelet development. Crop Sci. 2011, 51: 1664-1672.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sreenivasulu N, Altschmied L, Radchuk V, Gubatz S, Wobus U, Weschke W: Transcript profiles and deduced changes of metabolic pathways in maternal and filial tissues of developing barley grains. Plant J. 2004, 37: 539-553.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sreenivasulu N, Borisjuk L, Junker BH, Mock HP, Rolletschek H, Seiffert U, Weschke W, Wobus U: Barley grain development toward an integrative view. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2010, 281: 49-89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sreenivasulu N, Radchuk V, Strickert M, Miersch O, Weschke W, Wobus U: Gene expression patterns reveal tissue-specific signaling networks controlling programmed cell death and ABA- regulated maturation in developing barley seeds. Plant J. 2006, 47: 310-327.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sreenivasulu N, Usadel B, Winter A, Radchuk V, Scholz U, Stein N, Weschke W, Strickert M, Close TJ, Stitt M, et al: Barley grain maturation and germination: metabolic pathway and regulatory network commonalities and differences highlighted by new MapMan/PageMan profiling tools. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 1738-1758.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sabelli PA, Larkins BA: The development of endosperm in grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149: 14-26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu QH, Spriggs A, Matthew L, Fan L, Kennedy G, Gubler F, Helliwell C: A diverse set of microRNAs and microRNA-like small RNAs in developing rice grains. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 1456-1465.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa S, Shaw P: Chromatin organization and cell fate switch respond to positional information in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2006, 439: 493-496.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Exner V, Hennig L: Chromatin rearrangements in development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008, 11: 64-69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colaiacovo M, Subacchi A, Bagnaresi P, Lamontanara A, Cattivelli L, Faccioli P: A computational-based update on microRNAs and their targets in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 595-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kantar M, Unver T, Budak H: Regulation of barley miRNAs upon dehydration stress correlated with target gene expression. Funct Integr Genomics. 2010, 10: 493-507.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Druka A, Muehlbauer G, Druka I, Caldo R, Baumann U, Rostoks N, Schreiber A, Wise R, Close T, Kleinhofs A, et al: An atlas of gene expression from seed to seed through barley development. Funct Integr Genomics. 2006, 6: 202-211.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanagisawa S: Dof domain proteins: plant-specific transcription factors associated with diverse phenomena unique to plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45: 386-391.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta N, Gupta AK, Kumar A: Spatial distribution pattern analysis of Dof1 transcription factor in different tissues of three Eleusine coracana genotypes differing in their grain colour, yield and photosynthetic efficiency. Mol Biol Rep. 2012, 39: 2089-2095.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanagisawa S: Dof1 and Dof2 transcription factors are associated with expression of multiple genes involved in carbon metabolism in maize. Plant J. 2000, 21: 281-288.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto MP, Onodera Y, Touno SM, Takaiwa F: Synergism between RPBF Dof and RISBZ1 bZIP activators in the regulation of rice seed expression genes. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 1694-1707.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho MH, Lim H, Shin DH, Jeon JS, Bhoo SH, Park YI, Hahn TR: Role of the plastidic glucose translocator in the export of starch degradation products from the chloroplasts in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2011, 190: 101-112.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toyota K, Tamura M, Ohdan T, Nakamura Y: Expression profiling of starch metabolism-related plastidic translocator genes in rice. Planta. 2006, 223: 248-257.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gutierrez L, Van Wuytswinkel O, Castelain M, Bellini C: Combined networks regulating seed maturation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12: 294-300.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holdsworth MJ, Bentsink L, Soppe WJ: Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol. 2008, 179: 33-54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki M, McCarty DR: Functional symmetry of the B3 network controlling seed development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008, 11: 548-553.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verdier J, Thompson RD: Transcriptional regulation of storage protein synthesis during dicotyledon seed filling. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49: 1263-1271.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Smet I, Lau S, Mayer U, Jurgens G: Embryogenesis - the humble beginnings of plant life. Plant J. 2010, 61: 959-970.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Hua D, He J, Duan Y, Chen Z, Hong X, Gong Z: Auxin Response Factor2 (ARF2) and its regulated homeodomain Gene HB33 mediate abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7: e1002172-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Izhaki A, Bowman JL: KANADI and class III HD-Zip gene families regulate embryo patterning and modulate auxin flow during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007, 19: 495-508.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC: microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005, 121: 207-221.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu PP, Montgomery TA, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Nonogaki H, Carrington JC: Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J. 2007, 52: 133-146.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mallory AC, Bartel DP, Bartel B: MicroRNA-directed regulation of Arabidopsis AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for proper development and modulates expression of early auxin response genes. Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 1360-1375.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams L, Carles CC, Osmont KS, Fletcher JC: A database analysis method identifies an endogenous trans-acting short-interfering RNA that targets the Arabidopsis ARF2, ARF3, and ARF4 genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 9703-9708.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu MF, Tian Q, Reed JW: Arabidopsis microRNA167 controls patterns of ARF6 and ARF8 expression, and regulates both female and male reproduction. Development. 2006, 133: 4211-4218.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, Arnold B, Dharmasiri N, Estelle M, Voinnet O, Jones JD: A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science. 2006, 312: 436-439.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogas J, Cheng JC, Sung ZR, Somerville C: Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science. 1997, 277: 91-94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holt BF, Boyes DC, Ellerstrom M, Siefers N, Wiig A, Kauffman S, Grant MR, Dangl JL: An evolutionarily conserved mediator of plant disease resistance gene function is required for normal Arabidopsis development. Dev Cell. 2002, 2: 807-817.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chu Z, Yuan M, Yao J, Ge X, Yuan B, Xu C, Li X, Fu B, Li Z, Bennetzen JL, et al: Promoter mutations of an essential gene for pollen development result in disease resistance in rice. Genes Dev. 2006, 20: 1250-1255.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellis JG, Dodds PN, Lawrence GJ: The role of secreted proteins in diseases of plants caused by rust, powdery mildew and smut fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007, 10: 326-331.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen QH, Saijo Y, Mauch S, Biskup C, Bieri S, Keller B, Seki H, Ulker B, Somssich IE, Schulze-Lefert P: Nuclear activity of MLA immune receptors links isolate-specific and basal disease-resistance responses. Science. 2007, 315: 1098-1103.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xin M, Wang Y, Yao Y, Song N, Hu Z, Qin D, Xie C, Peng H, Ni Z, Sun Q: Identification and characterization of wheat long non-protein coding RNAs responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress by using microarray analysis and SBS sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11: 61-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xin M, Wang Y, Yao Y, Xie C, Peng H, Ni Z, Sun Q: Diverse set of microRNAs are responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10: 123-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J: SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24: 713-714.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang G: Plant microRNAs: an insight into their gene structures and evolution. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010, 21: 782-789.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Zhang Y, Yang K, Sun Z, Fu Y, Chen X, Fang R: Small RNAs from MITE-derived stem-loop precursors regulate abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress responses in rice. Plant J. 2011, 65: 820-828.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouyang S, Buell CR: The TIGR Plant Repeat Databases: a collective resource for the identification of repetitive sequences in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D360-D363.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- German MA, Luo S, Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ: Construction of Parallel Analysis of RNA Ends (PARE) libraries for the study of cleaved miRNA targets and the RNA degradome. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4: 356-362.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.