The pathway of cell dismantling during programmed cell death in lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves
© Wertman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 27 March 2012
Accepted: 25 June 2012
Published: 25 July 2012
Developmentally regulated programmed cell death (PCD) is the controlled death of cells that occurs throughout the life cycle of both plants and animals. The lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) forms perforations between longitudinal and transverse veins in spaces known as areoles, via developmental PCD; cell death begins in the center of these areoles and develops towards the margin, creating a gradient of PCD. This gradient was examined using both long- and short-term live cell imaging, in addition to histochemical staining, in order to establish the order of cellular events that occur during PCD.
The first visible change observed was the reduction in anthocyanin pigmentation, followed by initial chloroplast changes and the bundling of actin microfilaments. At this stage, an increased number of transvacuolar strands (TVS) was evident. Perhaps concurrently with this, increased numbers of vesicles, small mitochondrial aggregates, and perinuclear accumulation of both chloroplasts and mitochondria were observed. The invagination of the tonoplast membrane and the presence of vesicles, both containing organelle materials, suggested evidence for both micro- and macro-autophagy, respectively. Mitochondrial aggregates, as well as individual chloroplasts were subsequently seen undergoing Brownian motion in the vacuole. Following these changes, fragmentation of nuclear DNA, breakdown of actin microfilaments and early cell wall changes were detected. The vacuole then swelled, causing nuclear displacement towards the plasma membrane (PM) and tonoplast rupture followed closely, indicating mega-autophagy. Subsequent to tonoplast rupture, cessation of Brownian motion occurred, as well as the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), nuclear shrinkage and PM collapse. Timing from tonoplast rupture to PM collapse was approximately 20 minutes. The entire process from initial chlorophyll reduction to PM collapse took approximately 48 hours. Approximately six hours following PM collapse, cell wall disappearance began and was nearly complete within 24 hours.
Results showed that a consistent sequence of events occurred during the remodelling of lace plant leaves, which provides an excellent system to study developmental PCD in vivo. These findings can be used to compare and contrast with other developmental PCD examples in plants.
KeywordsAponogeton madagascariensis Autophagy Lace plant Live-cell imaging Programmed cell death (PCD)
Programmed cell death
Programmed cell death (PCD) occurs in both plants and animals, and is a highly regulated process that happens either as a part of normal development or in response to environmental influences [1, 2]. Examples of environmentally induced PCD include, but are not limited to: heat shock  and the hypersensitive response (HR) [4–7]. Examples of developmentally regulated PCD include, but are not limited to: deletion of the embryonic suspensor [8–11], tracheary element (TE) differentiation , leaf senescence , and leaf morphogenesis [1, 14–19].
The classification of plant PCD into categories based on morphological characteristics has been challenging in the past [2, 7, 20]. In 2000 Fukuda  defined three different forms of plant PCD 1. Apoptotic-like 2. Cell death during senescence and 3. PCD in which the vacuole plays a central role. In 2005 van Doorn and Woltering  compared plant PCD with three previously established morphological categories of metazoan cell death 1. Apoptosis 2. Autophagy and 3. Non-lysosomal PCD; these authors found that no plant examples conformed to the apoptotic type . In 2008 Reape and McCabe  reverted to the use of Fukudas’ (2000) term, apoptotic-like cell death, referring to examples from both induced and developmentally regulated PCD. Recently, plant PCD has been classified into two main categories based on morphological characteristics: necrotic and vacuolar cell death . However, these authors agree with van Doorn et al 2011 , that biochemical and molecular data are needed to classify the categories of plant PCD more accurately.
Autophagy is known to play a major role in the regulation of death in animal cells, but the extent to which autophagy is involved in plant PCD has yet to be concretized [20, 24–26]. Autophagy has been divided into three forms within plants: micro-, macro-, and mega-autophagy [20, 27, 28]. Micro-autophagy is the uptake of organelles or other cellular contents by a lytic compartment, usually the vacuole in plant cells [20, 28]. Macro-autophagy involves the creation of a double membraned structure containing cytosolic contents, called an autophagosome; this organelle will then fuse with a compartment, such as the vacuole, containing lytic enzymes [20, 27, 28]. Lastly, mega-autophagy involves the permeabilization or rupture of the tonoplast and the release of hydrolytic enzymes into the cell, causing total degradation [20, 28].
Processes such as leaf senescence, TE differentiation, and the deletion of the embryonic suspensor have emerged as valuable examples used to study plant cell death [13, 29, 30]. However, to date very little research has been conducted in vivo to understand the order of organelle changes, which occur during developmentally regulated PCD in planta. Therefore, this study focused on establishing the sequence of cellular changes during plant PCD, to begin understanding cause and effect relationships between plant organelles.
The lace plant as a novel model organism to study PCD in vivo
The process of perforation formation in lace plant leaves has been divided into five stages, as outlined in Gunawardena et al (2004) . The present study will focus on stage 2, or window stage leaves, where PCD is actively occurring (Figure 1B). This window stage leaf is then examined at the level of a single areole (Figure 1C). The window stage areole is subdivided into three groups of cells along a gradient of PCD, based on morphological characteristics . These groups include: non-PCD or control cells (NPCD; Figure 1C, between white and red lines), early-PCD cells (EPCD; Figure 1C, between red and blue lines) and late-PCD cells (LPCD; Figure 1C, inside blue rectangle). NPCD stage cells possess pink colouration, indicating the presence of the pigment anthocyanin. EPCD cells display chlorophyll pigmentation but no longer display large amounts of anthocyanin, indicating that this is one of the earliest changes in lace plant PCD [14, 18]. The length of time between anthocyanin disappearance and chlorophyll reduction is still under investigation. Note that the leaves used in this study have previously lost most visible anthocyanin as this is a precise way to ensure that the area of interest will perforate. In the lace plant, various cellular morphological characteristics have been examined throughout the process of cell death [18, 19], however the detailed characterization of the order of events occurring throughout the entire process has not yet been investigated. The aim of this paper is to use the novel lace plant system to delineate the possible order of organelle changes that occur throughout developmental PCD using both in vivo long- and short-term live cell imaging. This study will also employ experiments using fixed tissue samples in order to supplement this data. As a subset of this goal, this paper will provide visual evidence for autophagy during developmental PCD in the lace plant.
Additional file 1: Video clip compilation showing the development of a window over a period of 72 hours. Note that this video focused initially on early-PCD (EPCD) stage cells. Chloroplast pigmentation, movement and size differ between cells in different stages of PCD. Small aggregates become larger as PCD advances and individual organelles are seen attaching to the aggregate. Transvacuolar strands (TVS) can be seen within cells and are most frequent in EPCD. Note the advancement of EPCD visibly denoted by a decrease in chloroplast size and number, resulting in a reduction in chlorophyll pigmentation. The two cells of interest show a loss of chloroplast pigmentation, individual organelles and aggregates undergoing Brownian motion, and near the final stages of PCD, nuclear displacement followed by PM collapse. Approximately 100X sped up. (MOV 19 MB)
Changes in F-actin, chloroplasts, mitochondria and nuclei
Additional file 2: Transvacuolar strands (TVS) in EPCD stage lace plant cells. Video displays chloroplasts and mitochondria (small, round, grey-coloured objects) within lace plant cells, in addition to the occurrences of visible TVS. Note the instances of organelle movement along TVS. Also note the perinuclear accumulation of some chloroplasts. Note the visible reduction in anthocyanin from the top right corner to the bottom left corner. Approximately 100X sped up. (MOV 8 MB)
Additional file 3: Aggregate cessation of Brownian motion. This video shows a gradient of cell death: control cells on the left, early-PCD (EPCD) stage cells in the center and late-PCD (LPCD) stage cells to the right. Video depicts perinuclear accumulation of chloroplasts. Note the moving organelle aggregates at the beginning of the movie. Note visible vacuole swelling, causing displacement of the nucleus and subsequent tonoplast rupture. Following tonoplast rupture, the organelle aggregate stops Brownian motion; PM collapse quickly follows this process. Approximately 200X sped up. (MOV 229 KB)
Evidence for autophagy and aggregate formation
In order to more closely examine these vesicles, lace plant cells in later stages of PCD were observed via TEM and similar membrane-bounded bodies were found (Figure 4E-G). Rarely, results displayed double-membraned bodies, sometimes containing organelle material (Figure 4E, F). Additionally, in several instances, vesicles, with or without contents, appeared to be fusing with the tonoplast membrane (Figure 4F). Further evidence of autophagic-like processes was seen using live-cell imaging; FM1-43 staining displayed vesiculation of LPCD lace plant cells that occasionally contained organelle material (Figure 4H).
Additional file 4: Mitochondrial aggregates stained with CMXRos. Video displays that the aggregate of organelles contains CMXRos stained, mitochondria. This video demonstrates that the aggregate is moving within the cells vacuole via Brownian motion. Refer to Figure 5 for histological analysis of these aggregates. Approximately 10X sped up. (MOV 7 MB)
Through the use of 3D analysis it was revealed that the aggregates (indicated by the arrows) were in the vacuole in later stages of cell death (Figure 5I, J). These aggregates of mitochondria and chloroplasts were also infrequently observed within vesicles (Figure 4H, 5C, D). In addition, TEM imaging depicted organelle material in an invagination of the tonoplast (Figure 4E, G) and within the vacuole (Figure 5C, D). In contrast, in NPCD stage cells, these organelles were normally dispersed throughout the cytosol and less commonly seen in the vacuole (Additional file 1).
Tonoplast rupture to cell wall degradation
Additional file 5: LPCD stage cells displaying tonoplast rupture and subsequent events. This video depicts vacuolar swelling, displacing the nucleus toward the PM. Following this, the tonoplast ruptures, allowing the nucleus to be temporarily liberated. The nucleus then condenses. Following this, the tonoplast shrinks and PM collapse follows closely. Approximately 200X sped up. (MOV 4 MB)
Additional file 6: Visualizing the process of PM collapse. Note that the mesophyll cells’ PMs begin collapse prior to the epidermal cells. Also note the synchronicity of PM collapse. Approximately 200X sped up. (MOV 4 MB)
The first visible change noted in lace plant cells undergoing PCD is the reduction/disappearance of anthocyanin . It is unclear whether this reduction is due to early changes in the pH of the vacuole following variations in tonoplast permeability, as seen in petal senescence , or due to the actual degradation of the pigment. More research is needed to determine the reason for these colour changes that occur early in the PCD process. This loss of pigment in the center of a perforation occurs very early in the PCD process, and is often already reduced when the leaf unfurls. Following this, the pigment chlorophyll becomes less abundant [14, 18]. This is due to the decrease in chlorophyll within the chloroplasts and the significant reduction in both chloroplast size and number  that is seen in EPCD cells (Additional file 1). Lim et al (2007)  also reported that loss of chlorophyll is a characteristic of leaf senescence, where initial changes occur within the chloroplasts .
Perhaps concurrently with chlorophyll reduction, actin filament organization begins to change. The actin filaments of the cytoskeleton are known to play major roles in cell expansion, division and differentiation; however, less is known about their role in PCD [35, 36]. At the border of NPCD-EPCD, filaments changed from thin, organized structures coating the periphery of each protoplast (Figure 2B), to thicker cables that are more haphazard in arrangement (Figure 2C); this was also seen in Picea abies embryos . Also at this stage an increase in the number of TVS becomes apparent. This increase in TVS has been reported during developmentally regulated PCD in the lace plant and during induced cell death in both lace plant protoplasts and tobacco suspension cultures [3, 18, 38]. Previous work in the Gunawardena lab showed organelles moving along TVS ; additional evidence of this is provided in the present study (Additional file 2). The movement of organelles along these TVS may result in the perinuclear accumulation of organelles seen in EPCD stage lace plant cells (Figure 3B) .
It was determined via FM1-43 staining that vesicles begin increasing in prevalence in EPCD stage cells. The majority of observed vesicle structures were membrane-bound bodies that may or may not contain organelle material. It is probable that the vesicles seen via FM1-43 staining and confocal imaging are the same vesicles seen in the cytosol and joining with the tonoplast via TEM imaging (Figure 4E-G). The present study also noted several instances of multi-membraned structures that sometimes contained organelle material. Similar swirled cytoplasmic membranes were seen by Filonova et al (2000)  during PCD in embryogenesis in Norway spruce and were called ‘whorls’ . Liu et al (2005)  also observed similar vesicle-containing membranous structures as seen in lace plant PCD, during the HR response in Nicotiana plants . In addition, it has been determined that autophagy is necessary for developmental PCD in TE formation in Arabidopsis, which may provide further evidence for the role autophagy plays in plant PCD . Overall, these membrane-bound structures represent evidence for autophagy during lace plant PCD.
As PCD progresses lace plant cells display aggregation of organelles. The early aggregation of mitochondria in cells undergoing PCD has been noted previously during induced cell death in Arabidopsis[39, 40] and also in previous developmental PCD studies within the lace plant [3, 19]. The various forms of microscopy used here depict chlorophyll-containing organelles, as well as mitochondria in these aggregates. The association among and between mitochondria and plastids has been observed previously, where mitochondria were often seen touching and embedded within chloroplasts of senescing wheat leaves .
Long-term live cell imaging provides evidence suggesting that the aggregates, characteristic of EPCD and LPCD stage cells, visibly increased in size, perhaps through the accumulation of individual organelles as PCD progresses (Additional file 1). Wright et al (2009)  previously noted aggregates in the vacuole of lace plant cells undergoing PCD that displayed distorted thylakoid membranes, thus indicating the presence of chloroplasts ; these aggregates appeared to be undergoing Brownian motion as seen in Additional files 1, 4, 3 and 6 of this manuscript. Through the use of confocal z-stack imaging and NIS-Elements Volume View Software, the present authors were able to determine that these aggregates were positioned in the vacuole during the later stages of PCD. Presumably, these organelles are in the vacuole to be degraded; however, it is as of yet unknown how and exactly when this movement into the vacuole occurs. The authors believe that small aggregates of mitochondria, and perhaps individual chloroplasts, are brought to the vacuole independently, potentially aided by TVS, following which aggregation would occur (Additional files 1, 3, 4 and 6). Alternatively, the aggregate could be assembled in the cytosol and then brought into the vacuole as a whole. Regardless, this phenomenon of organelles in the vacuole is likely indicative of some form of autophagy .
In LPCD stage cells, it is also discernible in Figure 3C and 3D that there are cells that have both CMXRos staining and TUNEL positive nuclei. In addition, Figure 3C and 3D also display cells, to the far left (late LPCD), that contain TUNEL positive nuclei without CMXRos staining. Therefore, it was deduced that DNA fragmentation occurs prior to the loss of mitochondrial ΔΨm indicated by a loss in CMXRos staining. Perhaps concurrently with the appearance of TUNEL positive nuclei, the actin cytoskeleton appeared to breakdown. Re-organization of actin into thick cables followed by its breakdown is a common feature of developmentally regulated plant PCD . Some authors proposed cytoskeleton alterations as a trigger for the onset of PCD in Arabidopsis during the HR . However current work in our lab suggests that cysteine-aspartate specific protease-like proteases (caspase-like proteases, CLPs) may act upon the actin cytoskeleton, suggesting the cytoskeleton may not be a initial trigger for PCD but instead a target of an upstream signal, although further research is required (data not shown). In addition to cytoskeletal changes in LPCD stage cells, the current study provides live cell imaging evidence of visible cell wall changes, as reported originally by Gunawardena et al (2007)  via TEM.
Following the appearance of TUNEL positive nuclei and the breakdown of actin, visible changes in tonoplast dynamics became apparent. It is unknown whether this marks the first change in tonoplast integrity, as it is also possible that an early change in selective permeability of the tonoplast could have caused the subsequent anthocyanin colour change. The rupture of the tonoplast is known to be involved in several examples of plant PCD including TE differentiation and aerenchyma formation [19, 43–45]. The present study demonstrates, to the best of these authors’ knowledge, the first in vivo video recording of tonoplast rupture and subsequent visible cellular events (Additional file 5). The rarity of the above observations is explained by the quick succession in which these events occur. Additional file 5 depicts swelling of the vacuole resulting in the flattening of the nucleus against the PM, a characteristic also seen in TE differentiation . In lace plant cells, this step is followed closely by tonoplast rupture, visible nuclear liberation, and subsequent cessation of organelle aggregate Brownian motion (Additional file 3), loss of mitochondrial ΔΨm (Figure 3C) and rapid nuclear shrinkage. Although it was not possible to view CMXRos stained cells and also see tonoplast rupture at the same time, the order for cessation of organelle aggregate movement and loss in mitochondrial ΔΨm was discerned from Lord et al 2011 . This maintenance of mitochondrial integrity until late in lace plant PCD is reminiscent of leaf senescence and xylem differentiation [13, 20, 46, 47]. A similar process is also seen in TE differentiation, where studies report liberation of the nucleus followed by complete nuclear degradation 20 min post tonoplast rupture due to nucleases being released from the vacuole . However, the current study does not provide evidence of complete nuclear degradation, as intact condensed nuclei can still be seen following cell wall degradation [Figure 7; [14, 17].
Tonoplast rupture is regarded as the decisive moment during plant PCD in which cytoplasmic streaming stops and the cell is considered dead [2, 18, 20]; more recently, tonoplast rupture has also been coined as the process of ‘mega-autophagy’ by van Doorn and Woltering (2005) . Within this manuscript we have presented evidence supporting van Doorn’s latest classification of the lace plant into vacuolar type PCD, especially with regards to the presence of autophagy characteristics. However, it is still unclear whether mega-autophagy by van Doorns and Woltering’s (2005)  definition applies to the lace plant given that most organelles have been degraded prior to tonoplast rupture.
Following tonoplast rupture within the lace plant system, PM collapse is observed (Figure 7. inset; Additional files 5 and 6). Additional evidence of PM collapse is seen via positive Evans Blue staining, that is only able to enter cells with compromised PMs (Figure 6). In the lace plant, there is approximately 48 hours between initial chlorophyll reduction and PM collapse (Additional file 1; Figure 1D-G). Depending on the form of PCD, PM collapse may or may not be followed by cell wall degradation [4, 9, 17, 43]. During TE differentiation, the cell wall is partially degraded and modified, leaving an empty tube . Conversely, during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis, increasing leaf weight is seen up until approximately 30 days following sowing, suggesting no visible wall degradation . In contrast to both of these systems, Gunawardena et al (2007)  showed changes in wall structure as early as in stage 2, or in window stage leaves during lace plant leaf morphogenesis via TEM. These results were complemented by results presented in this manuscript in which cell wall disappearance was shown to occur within 24 hours of PM collapse using live cell imaging (Figure 7A-D) . The inset in Figure 7 displays an LPCD stage cell with a blebbed PM and intact cell wall, indicating PM collapse precedes visible cell wall degradation. However, the extent of cell wall degradation was examined only qualitatively here and thus represents a possible area for future research.
This study aimed to employ the novel in vivo system of a single areole in a window stage lace plant leaf, to elucidate the sequence of organelle changes occurring throughout developmentally regulated PCD in plants. The first visible change observed was the reduction in visible anthocyanin, then initial reduction of chlorophyll pigmentation within chloroplasts along with changes in chloroplast size and number. Perhaps concurrently with chloroplast changes, actin filaments re-organized into bundles, and there were increased numbers of TVS and additional instances of organelles travelling along TVS. Mitochondria then tended to form small groupings in the cytosol, and cells often possessed rings of chloroplasts surrounding the nucleus. Live cell imaging revealed single-layered membranous structures while TEM imaging revealed both single and multi-layered membranous structures; each of which were seen to occasionally contain organelle material. In addition, images depicting invaginations of the tonoplast and double membrane-bound vesicles indicating a role for micro- and macro- autophagy in lace plant PCD were also presented. Later, the aggregate of mitochondria and chloroplasts could be seen within the vacuole undergoing Brownian motion, and this aggregate visibly increased in size as PCD progressed. This study shows, for the first time, an in vivo video during developmentally regulated PCD, of vacuole swelling and tonoplast collapse, resembling mega-autophagy. This paper provided evidence of these events leading to the cessation of organelle aggregate movement, loss of mitochondrial ΔΨm, nuclear shrinkage and PM collapse. Total time from reduction in visible chlorophyll to PM collapse is approximately 48 hours. Cell wall disappearance followed the collapse of the PM within 24 hours. This study reports a consistent order of events that occur in lace plant cells undergoing PCD, in addition to providing visual evidence of autophagy.
Plant material and selection
Lace plants were propagated using the sterile tissue culture technique described in Gunawardena et al (2006) . In brief, plants were grown in magenta boxes containing both solid and liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Figure 1A). These lace plants were exposed to 12 h light/12 h dark cycles provided by daylight simulating fluorescent bulbs (Philips, Daylight Deluxe, F40T12/DX, Markham, Ontario) at approximately 125 μmol m−2 s−1 at 24°C. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). All experiments were completed at least 5 times, unless otherwise stated. Additionally, all image plates were composed using Adobe Photoshop Elements version 6.0.
Experiments used window stage, or stage 2, lace plant leaves (Figure 1B). Areoles in which the pigments had already cleared from the centermost cells were chosen. This was done to ensure that the given areole would in fact perforate, as some never do. In addition, windows were chosen in which there was a clear delineation between NPCD, EPCD and LPCD stage cells. These stages, represented by the rectangles in Figure 1C, served as a gradient through which all stages of the PCD process could be observed simultaneously. Cells within four to five cells of the vasculature were denoted as non-PCD cells (NPCD; Figure 1C, between white and red lines). These cells were prominently pink in colour due to the pigment anthocyanin found in their vacuole, were not pre-disposed to undergo PCD, and were therefore used as control cells. Cells interior to the control cells were in the early stages of cell death and were regarded as early-PCD cells (EPCD; Figure 1C, between red and blue lines); anthocyanin in these cells had disappeared and they were green in colour due to the abundance of chlorophyll containing chloroplasts within them. In the center of the areole, the cells were in the latest stage of cell death, were generally cleared of all pigments, and were called late-PCD cells (LPCD; Figure 1C, inside blue rectangle). It is important to note, however, that LPCD stage cells were once EPCD stage cells and all EPCD stage cells will develop into LPCD stage cells. Although EPCD cells, which contain anthocyanin, are similar in appearance to NPCD cells, NPCD stage cells differ in that they do not undergo PCD during perforation formation. Therefore, NPCD cells remain static, whereas both the EPCD and LPCD actively undergo PCD.
All light microscopy observations were conducted using DIC optics on a Nikon Eclipse 90i compound microscope (Nikon Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Images were captured using a digital camera (DXM 1200c). NIS-Elements AR Version 3.0 software was used for both imaging and analysis on this microscope. All slides were prepared as wet mounts.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy observations were conducted using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope fitted with a digital camera (Nikon DS-Fi1). EZ-C1 3.80 imaging software was used for image acquisition and Ti Control was used for microscope control. Images were captured using DIC optics and corresponding fluorescent images were taken using either tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC excitation 527–552 nm, emission 577–632 nm) or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; excitation 460–500 nm, emission 510–560 nm) lasers. Maximum projection images were composed of approximately 30 to 50 successive z-stack images compiled using NIS-Elements AR version 3.0 software.
Transmission electron microscopy
Window stage leaves were cut from lace plants and segments of approximately 2 mm × 2 mm were fixed in 2% (w/v) gluteraldehyde in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 6.9) in a vacuum at 20 psi for 24 h. These segments were rinsed in buffer and post fixed for 4 h at room temperature in 2.5% aqueous osmium tetroxide and then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series. Leaf pieces were then placed in ethanol:Spurr resin mixtures and embedded in Spurr resin and polymerized for 9 h at 70°C. A Reichert-Jung ultra-microtome was used to prepare the gold sections that were then gathered on formvar coated grids and finally stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. These prepared segments were viewed using a Philips Technai 12 TEM (Philips Electron Optics, Eindhoven, Netherlands) operating at 80 kV. This microscope was fitted with a Kodak Megaview II camera (Rochester, New York, USA), with appropriate software (AnalySIS, Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany).
Long and short term live cell imaging
Videos were acquired on a compound light microscope using the audio video interleave (AVI) capture function in NIS-Elements AR software version 3.0. Long term live cell imaging (~72 h) experiments were carried out using window stage leaves where PCD was not visibly initiated, as denoted by central cells of the areoles still possessing green colour due to the presence of chloroplasts. The leaves were mounted between a custom slide and coverslip, submerged in 400 μL of distilled water and then sealed with petroleum jelly to prevent evaporation. Every six hours, the samples were rinsed three times with distilled water, re-mounted, and refocused to the appropriate cells.
Following the determination of the basic timeline of the cellular changes in PCD, it was necessary to obtain high-magnification videos for particular events. Videos were taken of carefully chosen window stage leaves, containing areoles in which the centermost cells were about to undergo membrane blebbing. The leaves were placed in between a slide and a coverslip and mounted as mentioned above. Samples were viewed for 1–6 h (short-term), with constant supervision to prevent changes in focal plane.
All videos were compressed using the Radius Cinepak Codec and kept at full length and size until subsequent analysis. Videos were shortened to the desired length using either QuickTime Pro (Version 10.0), IMovie (Version 9.0.2) or Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 (Version 5.0) software. Arrows and text were inserted into the videos using Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 (Version 5.0) or QuickTime Pro (Version 10.0). Videos captured throughout individual long-term live cell imaging experiments were trimmed, compiled and edited using Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 (Version 5.0).
Alexa fluor 488 phalloidin
Window stage leaves were removed from plants and the midrib was excised. These segments were then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (BioShop Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada) solution containing actin-stabilizing buffer (ASB) for 3 h at 4°C. These segments were rinsed, cut into 5 mm2 and incubated overnight with 0.1 μM Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Invitrogen Canada Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada) with 0.1% Triton X-100, all in ASB. After rinsing, the segments were counterstained with 0.5 mg/ml PI for approximately 5 min, mounted in Fluorogel (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA) and viewed via confocal microscopy.
MitoTracker red CMXRos
CMXRos stain was dissolved initially in DMSO and further in dH20 to a final concentration of 0.6 μM. Window stage leaves were removed from lace plants, the mid rib was removed and the leaf was cut into segments of approximately 5 mm2. These leaf sections were incubated in CMXRos at room temperature in the dark for 60 min. Following this, the leaves were rinsed 8 times in dH20 and shaken at 100 rpm for 90 min. The leaf sections were then mounted in dH20 and viewed via confocal microscopy.
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay (TUNEL)
Window stage leaf segments were prepared as per the CMXRos staining protocol, fixed in FAA for 2 h, and rinsed 3 times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The TUNEL assay was completed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Segments were counterstained with 3% (w/v) propidium iodide (PI) for 2 min. for co-localization of nuclei; PI fluorescence was excluded during figure preparation. Positive controls were competed with DNase 1 and negative controls were completed without the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase enzyme. All samples were then viewed with confocal microscopy.
Window stage leaf segments were prepared as per the CMXRos staining protocol and incubated in a 5 μg/ml FM1-43 solution dissolved in ice cold PBS. Leaf pieces were then incubated in a vacuum at 20 psi for 4 h. These leaf segments were not rinsed, but counterstained immediately with 3% (w/v) PI for 3 min and subsequently mounted in Fluorogel (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). These segments were viewed via confocal microscopy within 1 h of staining.
To conduct the vesicle counting trials, window stage leaves were stained as above. Cells from each stage of PCD were captured with z-stack imaging and compiled into a maximum projection image, to simultaneously show all planes. The total number of whole cells seen in each image was counted. The number of cells in each image that contained at least one vesicle was counted. The number of cells containing vesicles was then divided by the total number of cells and multiplied by 100 in order to obtain a percentage of cells containing vesicles per stage. This value was averaged over at least 120 cells per stage. Data was analyzed using a general linear model of variance ANOVA and the average percentages were compared using the Tukey test at 95% confidence intervals (P < 0.05). Statistical analysis was carried out using Minitab 16 statistical software (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA, 1972).
Three-dimensional image analysis was performed on window stage leaves stained with FM1-43, as described above. Confocal microscopy was employed to capture 30–50 successive z-stack images of cells from an areole of a window stage leaf. Files from the EZ-C1 software were exported and opened with NIS-Elements AR (Version 3.0), containing the Deconvolution Demonstration from Nikon. Images were compiled and edited with the Volume View function and the Deconvolution Demonstration Package.
Window stage leaves were cut from lace plants and had their midribs removed. The leaf segments were then stained for one hour in a 0.5% (w/v) solution of Evans Blue dissolved in dH20. Leaves were then washed in distilled water, mounted on a slide and viewed with the compound light microscope.
JW and CENL both contributed equally to manuscript preparation. JW carried out experiments including: selected short-term imaging, all FM1-43 staining and 3D analysis, selected CMXRos and all Evans blue staining, as well as TUNEL staining and imaging. CENL carried out experiments including: selected short-term imaging, cytoskeleton staining, TUNEL staining and imaging, selected CMXRos staining, statistical analysis, as well as light microscopy for cell wall degradation images. AND completed selected CMXRos staining, long-term live cell imaging, video editing and flow-chart compellation. JW drafted the first manuscript while JW, AND and CENL all contributed to final manuscript revisions. AHLANG, conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped in manuscript revisions as well as supervised all experimental work.
Mitochondrial membrane potential
MitoTracker Red CMXRos
Early-Programmed cell death
Late-Programmed cell death
Non-Programmed cell death
Programmed Cell Death
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling
The authors greatly acknowledge Dr. Peter Bozhkov (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) for critical review of this MS. Thank you to Stephanie Lane (Dalhousie University) for live cell imaging assistance. We would also like to thank Nikon Canada for allowing us to use the deconvolution demonstration for NIS-Elements to prepare two micrographs for this work. Additionally, the authors acknowledge the Sarah Lawson Research Scholarship (Dalhousie University) for funding for JW. The authors also wish to thank the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for doctoral funding for CENL. Lastly, thank you to the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) for the Leaders Opportunity Fund along with NSERC for discovery and equipment grants for AHLANG.
- Gunawardena AHLAN: Programmed cell death and tissue remodelling in plants. J Exp Bot. 2008, 59: 445-451. 10.1093/jxb/erm189.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones AM: Programmed cell death in development and defense. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125: 94-97. 10.1104/pp.125.1.94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lord CEN, Gunawardena AHLAN: Environmentally induced programmed cell death in leaf protoplasts of Aponogeton madagascariensis. Planta. 2011, 233: 407-421. 10.1007/s00425-010-1304-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pennel RI, Lamb C: Programmed cell death in plants. Plant Cell. 1997, 9: 1157-1168. 10.1105/tpc.9.7.1157.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Groover A, DeWitt N, Heidel A, Jones A: Programmed cell death of plant tracheary elements differentiating in vitro. Protoplasma. 1997, 196: 197-211. 10.1007/BF01279568.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuriyama H, Fukuda H: Developmental programmed cell death in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002, 5: 568-573. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00305-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reape TJ, Molony EM, McCabe PF: Programmed cell death in plants: distinguishing between different modes. J Exp Bot. 2008, 59 (3): 435-444. 10.1093/jxb/erm258.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Schiff M, Czymmek K, Talloczy Z, Levine B, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Autophagy regulates programmed cell death during the plant immune response. Cell. 2005, 121: 567-577. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Filonova LH, Bozhkov PV, Brukhin VB, Daniel G, Zhivotovsky B, von Arnold S: Two waves of programmed cell death occur during formation and development of somatic embryos in the gymnosperm, Norway spruce. J Cell Sci. 2000, 113: 4399-4411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vuosku J, Sarjala T, Jokela A, Sutela S, Sääkilahti M, Suorsa M, et al: One tissue, two fates: different roles of megagametophyte cells during Scots pine embryogenesis. J Exp Bot. 2009, 60 (4): 1375-1386. 10.1093/jxb/erp020.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giuliani C, Consonni G, Gavazzi G, Colombo M, Dolfini S: Programmed cell death during embryogenesis in maize. Ann Bot. 2002, 90: 287-292. 10.1093/aob/mcf173.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukuda H: Tracheary element differentiation. Plant Cell. 1997, 9: 1147-1156. 10.1105/tpc.9.7.1147.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim PO, Kim HJ, Nam HG: Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007, 58: 115-136. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunawardena AHLAN, Greenwood JS, Dengler NG: Programmed cell death remodels lace plant leaf shape during development. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 60-73. 10.1105/tpc.016188.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunawardena AHLAN, Sault K, Donnelly P, Greenwood JS, Dengler NG: Programmed cell death and leaf morphogenesis in Monstera oblique. Planta. 2005, 221: 607-618. 10.1007/s00425-005-1545-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunawardena AHLAN, Navachandrabala C, Kane M, Dengler NG, Teixeira da Silva JA: Lace plant: a novel system for studying developmental programmed cell death. Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology: advances and tropical issues volume 1. 2006, Global Science Books, Ltd, Middlesex, 157-162.Google Scholar
- Gunawardena AHLAN, Greenwood JS, Dengler NG: Cell wall degradation and modification during programmed cell death in lace plant, Aponogeton madagascariensis (Aponogetonaceae). Am J Bot. 2007, 94: 1116-1128. 10.3732/ajb.94.7.1116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wright H, van Doorn WG, Gunawardena AHLAN: In vivo study of developmental programmed cell death using the lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis; Aponogetonacae) leaf model system. Am J Bot. 2009, 96 (5): 865-876. 10.3732/ajb.0800343.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lord CEN, Wertman JN, Lane S, Gunawardena AHLAN: Do mitochondria play a role in remodeling lace plant leaves during programmed cell death?. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11: 102-10.1186/1471-2229-11-102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Doorn WG, Woltering EJ: Many ways to exit? Cell death categories in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10: 117-122. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.01.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukuda H: Programmed cell death of tracheary elements as a paradigm in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 44 (3): 245-253. 10.1023/A:1026532223173. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11199386PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reape TJ, McCabe PF: Apoptotic-like programmed cell death in plants. New Phytol. 2008, 180 (1): 13-26. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02549.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Doorn WG, Beers EP, Dangl JL, Franklin-Tong VE, Gallois P, Hara-Nishimura I, et al: Morphological classification of plant cell deaths. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18: 1-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edinger AL, Thompson CB: Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004, 16: 663-669. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwon SI, Park OK: Autophagy in plants. J Plant Biol. 2008, 51 (5): 313-320. 10.1007/BF03036132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Denton D, Nicolson S, Kumar S: Cell death by autophagy: facts and apparent artefacts. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19: 87-95. 10.1038/cdd.2011.146.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elmore S: Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxic Pathol. 2007, 35: 495-10.1080/01926230701320337.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Doorn WG, Yoshimoto K: Role of chloroplasts and other plastids in ageing of plants and animals: a tale of Vishnu and Shiva. Ageing Res Rev. 2010, 9: 130-177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bozhkov PV, Suarez MF, Filonova LH, Daniel G, Zamyatnin A, Rodriguez-Nieto S, Zhivotovsky B, et al: Cysteine protease mcII-Pa executes programmed cell death during plant embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (40): 14463-14468. 10.1073/pnas.0506948102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Obara K, Fukuda H: Programmed cell death in xylem differentiation. Programmed cell death in plants. Edited by: Gray J. 2004, Blackwell, Oxford, 131-154.Google Scholar
- Sergueff M: Contribution á la Morphologie et la Biologie des Aponogetonacees. 1907, University of Geneva, Geneva, PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar
- Kasselmann C: Aquarium plants. 2003, Krieger Publishing Co, Malabar, 132-133.Google Scholar
- Lord CEN, Gunawardena AHLAN: The lace plant: a novel model system to study plant proteases during developmental programmed cell death in vivo. Physiol Plant. 2012Google Scholar
- van Doorn WG: Is petal senescence due to sugar starvation?. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134: 35-42. 10.1104/pp.103.033084.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith LG, Oppenheimer DG: Spatial control of cell expansion by the plant cytoskeleton. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005, 21: 271-295. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.122303.114901.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smertenko A, Franklin-Tong VE: Organization and regulation of the cytoskeleton in plant programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18: 1263-1270. 10.1038/cdd.2011.39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smertenko A, Bozhkov PV, Filonova LH, von Arnold S, Hussey PJ: Re-organization of the cytoskeleton during developmental programmed cell death in Picea abies embryos. Plant J. 2003, 33: 813-824. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01670.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reisen D, Marty F, Leborgne-Castel N: New insights into the tonoplast architecture of plant vacuoles and vacuolar dynamics during osmotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2005, 5: 13-10.1186/1471-2229-5-13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yao N, Eisfelder BK, Marvin J, Greenberg JT: The mitochondrion - an organelle commonly involved in programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004, 40: 596-610. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02239.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scott I, Logan DC: Mitochondrial morphology transition is an early indicator of subsequent cell death in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2008, 177: 90-101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wittenbach VA, Lin W, Hebert RR: Vacuolar localization of proteases and degradation of chloroplasts in mesophyll protoplasts from senescing primary wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69: 98-102. 10.1104/pp.69.1.98.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tian M, Chaudhry F, Ruzicka DR, Meagher RB, Staiger CJ, Day B: Arabidopsis actin-depolymerizing factor AtADF4 mediates defense signal transduction triggered by the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPphB. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150: 815-824. 10.1104/pp.109.137604.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Obara K, Kuriyama H, Fukuda H: Direct evidence of active and rapid nuclear degradation triggered by vacuole rupture during programmed cell death in zinnia. Plant Phys. 2001, 125: 615-626. 10.1104/pp.125.2.615.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drew MC, He C, Morgan PW: Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation in roots. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5 (3): 123-127. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01570-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bouranis DL, Chorianpoulou SN, Siyannis VF, Protonotarios VE, Hawkesford MJ: Lysigenous aerenchyma development in roots- triggers and cross- talks for a cell elimination program. Int J Plant Dev Biol. 2007, 1 (1): 127-140.Google Scholar
- Inada N, Sakai A, Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T: Three-dimensional analysis of the senescence program in rice (Oryza sativa L.) coleoptiles. Planta. 1998, 206: 585-597. 10.1007/s004250050436.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu X, Perdue A, Heimer Y, Jones A: Mitochondrial participation in tracheary element cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2002, 9: 189-198. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400940.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Breeze E, Harrison E, McHattie S, Hughes L, Hickman R, Hill C, Kiddle S, Kim Y-, Penfold CA, Jenkins D, Zhang C, Morris K, Jenner C, Jackson S, Thomas B, Tabrett A, Legaie R, Moore JD, Wild DL, Ott S, Rand D, Beynon J, Denby K, Mead A, Wollaston-Buchanan V: High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation. Plant Cell. 2011, 23: 873-894. 10.1105/tpc.111.083345.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.