Glutathione synthesis is essential for pollen germination in vitro
© Zechmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 18 December 2010
Accepted: 26 March 2011
Published: 26 March 2011
The antioxidant glutathione fulfills many important roles during plant development, growth and defense in the sporophyte, however the role of this important molecule in the gametophyte generation is largely unclear. Bioinformatic data indicate that critical control enzymes are negligibly transcribed in pollen and sperm cells. Therefore, we decided to investigate the role of glutathione synthesis for pollen germination in vitro in Arabidopsis thaliana accession Col-0 and in the glutathione deficient mutant pad2-1 and link it with glutathione status on the subcellular level.
The depletion of glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), an inhibitor of glutathione synthesis, reduced pollen germination rates to 2-5% compared to 71% germination in wildtype controls. The application of reduced glutathione (GSH), together with BSO, restored pollen germination and glutathione contents to control values, demonstrating that inhibition of glutathione synthesis is responsible for the decrease of pollen germination in vitro. The addition of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to media containing BSO restored pollen germination to control values, which demonstrated that glutathione depletion in pollen grains triggered disturbances in auxin metabolism which led to inhibition of pollen germination.
This study demonstrates that glutathione synthesis is essential for pollen germination in vitro and that glutathione depletion and auxin metabolism are linked in pollen germination and early elongation of the pollen tube, as IAA addition rescues glutathione deficient pollen.
KeywordsArabidopsis auxin gametophyte glutathione indole-3-acetic acid pollen
Glutathione is an important antioxidant and redox buffer in eukaryotes and most prokaryotes that fulfills many roles in plant metabolism and plant defense during abiotic and biotic stress conditions in the sporophyte , but its role remains largely unknown for the gametophyte. In the sporophyte, glutathione is involved in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), redox signaling, the modulation of gene expression and in the regulation of enzymatic activities [extensively reviewed by 1]. Glutathione is also involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics, herbicides [2, 3] heavy metals such as cadmium [4–8], and protects proteins from oxidation by a process called glutathionylation [9–11]. The importance of glutathione for plant growth and development is highlighted by the observation that impaired glutathione synthesis correlates with growth defects [12, 13], and that the complete absence of glutathione synthesis results in a lethal phenotype . Additionally, the redox state of glutathione is also important for plant growth and development. In non-stressed plants it occurs mainly in its reduced form (GSH), whereas during oxidative stress high amounts of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) can be formed. The occurrence of high amounts of GSSG correlates with reduced growth, dormancy, or cell death [15–17].
Glutathione synthesis takes place in two ATP-dependent steps triggered by enzymes that are encoded by single genes in Arabidopsis . In the first step cysteine is linked with glutamate to form γ-glutamylcysteine. This reaction is triggered by γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GSH1). In the second step, glycine is linked to γ-glutamylcysteine by glutathione synthetase (GSH2) to form the final product glutathione. In Arabidopsis, these two steps seem to take place exclusively in plastids and the cytosol, which are therefore considered as the main centers of glutathione synthesis . In the sporophyte, transcripts of GSH1 and GSH2 and the final product, glutathione, can be found in all major plant parts and in all cell organelles at different concentrations (Additional files 1 and 2) [19, 20]. According to immunohistochemistry and quantitative transmission electron microscopy, the highest levels of glutathione have been detected in mitochondria and the lowest in plastids. Vacuoles contained glutathione only under certain conditions (e.g. high sulfur soil contents, high amounts of oxidized glutathione) [21, 22], whereas glutathione could not be detected in cell walls . Although the role and subcellular distribution of glutathione in the sporophyte are well defined, the necessity and role of glutathione in the gametophyte remain largely unexamined. Bioinformatic data cast doubt on the importance of glutathione metabolism in the male gametophyte, as both GSH1 and GSH2 are transcribed at negligible levels in pollen and sperm cells (Additional files 1 and 2) [23, 24]. Nevertheless, due to the apparent sensitivity of microspores to mitochondrial damage induced by chronic oxidative stress , we decided to investigate the necessity and localization of glutathione in the gametophyte in order to reveal strategies for pollen to cope with ROS during tube germination and elongation.
In the current study, we investigate whether glutathione is essential for pollen germination, and if so, whether such pools of glutathione depend on new synthesis or an existing glutathione pool available in the pollen grains before the start of germination. The subcellular distribution of glutathione will also reveal if glutathione is distributed equally or shows compartment-specific adaptations as found in leaf and root cells .
In order to achieve this goal we studied pollen germination rates and the subcellular distribution of glutathione in pollen grains of wildtype plants treated with and without buthionine sulfoximine (BSO). BSO is known to inhibit the first enzyme of the glutathione synthesis pathway thus leading to a strong decrease in glutathione levels [26–31]. Additionally, we studied pollen germination rates and the subcellular distribution of glutathione in the pollen grains of the pad2-1 mutant, which has a mutation of the first enzyme of the glutathione synthetic pathway thus reducing the content of glutathione by 80% compared to the wildtype [19, 32]. Differences in glutathione contents between the wildtype and the pad2-1 mutant should give detailed insight into the roles of temporary and permanent glutathione depletion on pollen germination in vitro.
Pollen grains from the pad2-1 mutant contained lower glutathione-labeling density (2.2 gold particles per μm2) than wildtype (Figure 8), whereas the addition of 1 mM GSH and 3 mM GSH to the germination media increased glutathione contents to values similar to pollen grains from wildtype plants (8.7 and 29 gold particles per μm2, respectively). Similar gold particle densities were reached when 0.1 mM BSO was added to GSH (Figure 8).
The results of this study clearly demonstrate that glutathione synthesis is essential for pollen germination in vitro. Despite negligible levels of GSH1 and GSH2 transcripts occurring in pollen and sperm cells [23, 24], glutathione was found to be clearly present and active in the male gametophyte. Pollen germination rates of wildtype pollen, used as controls in the current study (71%), were similar to those observed in previous studies under similar conditions . Inhibition of glutathione synthesis by BSO decreased the pollen germination rate to about 5%, which could be correlated with the absence of glutathione specific labeling in our immunogold assays. BSO inhibits the first enzyme (GSH1) of the glutathione synthesis pathway, which leads to a decrease or complete absence of glutathione in leaves [26–31]. In pollen grains of the pad2-1 mutant, in which glutathione synthesis is distorted by a single point mutation in GSH1, decreasing glutathione content to ~20% of wildtype  a similar result is observed. Pollen germination of the pad2-1 mutant was reduced to about 16%, and correlated with an 80% reduction in glutathione specific immunolabeling when compared to the wildtype. A further decrease of pollen germination rate to 5% was accomplished by the addition of BSO to the growth media. Similar results have also been observed during germ tube development in Candida albicans. Similarly, strong depletions in GSH contents induced by 1-chloro-2,4 dinitrobenzene were correlated with very significant reductions in germ tube formation capacity and severe cell mortality . The addition of 1 mM GSH to growth media containing BSO, could restore pollen germination rate and glutathione specific labeling to values similar to the controls in pollen from both wildtype plants and the pad2-1 mutant. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate that glutathione synthesis and the availability are essential for pollen germination and demonstrate the importance of glutathione not only for plant development but also for pollen germination and tube growth. Additionally, these results showed that pollen grains where glutathione synthesis was inhibited by BSO were able to import glutathione from the growth medium by unknown mechanisms. This could be important considering that glutathione uptake transporters have not been identified yet at the plasma membrane and that negligible transcripts levels of GSH1 and GSH2 were found in pollen and sperm cells [23, 24].
The pad2-1 GSH1 point mutant showed a much lower pollen germination rate (71% vs. 16%, respectively), which presumably correlates with a much lower glutathione content (-80%) when compared to the wildtype. As the pad2-1 mutant accumulates only about 20% glutathione levels of the wildtype , these results demonstrate that glutathione contents in pollen grains strongly depend on adequate glutathione availability in the plant. Compartment-specific differences (e.g., accumulation of glutathione in mitochondria), as observed in leaves and roots of the pad2-1 mutants , could not be detected in pollen grains where glutathione concentrations were found to be distributed in all typically labelled cell compartments equally. A slightly higher germination rate of pad2-1 pollen (about 25%) could be accomplished by the addition of 3 mM GSH to the growth media, which still displayed far below the normal germination rate of wildtype control pollen grains (71%) and was similar to the germination rate achieved when pollen grains from the wildtype were treated with the same GSH concentration (16%). The addition of 5 mM GSH decreased pollen germination rate in both wildtype and pad2-1 mutants to 12% and 6%, respectively, demonstrating that high levels of GSH negatively affect the ability of pollen grains to germinate. It has been demonstrated recently that the treatment of roots with high levels of GSH can cause severe ultrastructural alterations [31, 37]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that in GSH-overexpressing tobacco plants, elevated glutathione biosynthetic capacity in the chloroplasts paradoxically increased oxidative stress, leading to severe ultrastructural alterations within chloroplasts and to their ultimate degeneration, eventuating in the death of the cell . Even though such ultrastructural changes have not been observed during the present study, treatment of pollen grains with high levels of GSH (e.g. 3 and 5 mM GSH) could potentially inhibit pollen germination (e.g., by changing the internal redox status). The application of BSO together with IAA, one of the most important hormones regulating pollen tube growth [33, 34] restored the rate of pollen germination in the pad2-1 mutant to about 14%, which was similar to levels achieved by untreated pollen of the pad2-1 mutant used as control. The same experiment restored the rate of pollen germination in the wildtype of BSO-treated pollen to over 60%. Thus, these results demonstrate that low glutathione levels in pollen grains of the pad2-1 mutant must have altered their ability to germinate in the long term. It has been demonstrated recently that the accumulation of ROS in mitochondria was found to be critical for proper pollen development, as sterile pollen grains showed decreased pools of ATP and NADH and lower activity of mitochondria DNA . As glutathione is essential for the detoxification of ROS/H2O2 in plants it seems likely that the low germination rates of pollen grains from the pad2-1 mutants were caused by low glutathione levels in the plant and pollen grains during pollen development in the stamen. Nevertheless, pollen grains are thought to possess resistance against or ability to downregulate production of stigma-associated ROS/H2O2 (e.g. by antioxidants) in order to germinate on and penetrate through the stigma . As pollen germination of pad2-1 pollen grains could be only partly increased by the addition of 1 and 3 mM GSH (from 14% to 16% and 25%, respectively) but never reached rates of the wildtype (71%) these results also suggest that insufficient glutathione is present without activity of GSH1 to permit normal rates of germination. Thus, we can conclude that sufficient glutathione contents are required during pollen development and also during pollen germination for proper pollen germination of pollen from the pad2-1 mutant.
Since a reduction of root growth induced by the depletion of GSH is caused by the inhibition of auxin transport [40, 41], we tested if inhibited pollen germination by BSO can be restored by treatment with IAA, which is one of the most important plant hormones for pollen tube growth [33, 34]. Results of this study demonstrated that the application of BSO together with IAA diminished the deleterious effects of BSO and led to pollen germination rates similar to that of control pollen. The addition of IAA alone or together with GSH did not have such affects. Thus, we can conclude that glutathione depletion in pollen grains triggered disturbances in auxin metabolism which are linked with inhibition of pollen germination induced by BSO treatment.
Summing up, it can be concluded that glutathione synthesis is essential for pollen germination in vitro. Additionally, it was demonstrated that low glutathione levels in the pad2-1 mutant decreased their ability to germinate caused by disturbances most probably during pollen development. The mechanisms behind the reduction of pollen germination induced by glutathione depletion could be correlated with disturbances in auxin metabolism which still have to be explored in more detail.
After stratification for 4 days at 4°C, seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh. Ecotype Columbia (Col-0) originally obtained from the European Arabidopsis stock centre (NASC; Loughborough, UK), and the glutathione deficient mutant line pad 2-1 were grown on soil in greenhouse conditions with approximately 16/8 h day/night photoperiod. Day and night temperatures were 22°C and 18°C, respectively. The relative humidity was 60% and the plants were kept at 100% relative soil water content. Light intensity varied between 120-150 μmol m-2 s-1.
Determination of pollen germination
Four to six weeks after flowering, pollen was harvested from about 20 different plants for each experiment and transferred onto pollen germination medium mounted on glass slides, which were kept and prepared in moist chambers at 22°C. Pollen germination medium was always prepared fresh with double distilled water and contained 5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 5 mM KCl, 0.01 mM H3BO3, 10% sucrose and 1.5% agarose. The pH-value was adjusted to 7.5 with a 1 M NaOH solution. In addition, different concentrations of reduced glutathione (GSH), buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) were added to the germination media. Pollen germination media contained either (a) no GSH and BSO (control), (b) 22.8 μM IAA, (c) 0.1 mM BSO, (d) 0.1 mM BSO and 22.8 μM IAA, (e) 1 mM GSH, (f) 1 mM GSH and 0.1 mM BSO, (g) 3 mM GSH, (h) 3 mM GSH and 0.1 mM BSO, (i) 3 mM GSH and 22.8 μM IAA, (j) 5 mM GSH, (k) 5 mM GSH and 0.1 mM BSO, and (l) 5 mM GSH and 22.8 μM IAA. In preliminary studies additional concentrations of BSO and GSH were tested (1.5 mM BSO and 5 mM BSO with or without the addition of 1 mM and 3 mM GSH) in order to evaluate the ideal BSO and GSH concentrations for the proposed experiments. IAA concentration was chosen according to previous studies which demonstrated that the addition of 22.8 μM (4 mg L-1) IAA stimulated pollen tube growth most effectively [33, 34]. Therefore, 100 mM stock solutions of GSH, BSO and IAA respectively, were prepared and small aliquots of these solutions were added to the pollen germination media to reach the final concentration of GSH, BSO, and IAA. The pH-value of the media was adjusted to 7.5 with a 1 mM NaOH-solution. After transferring pollen on the germination media, grains were allowed to germinate in the dark at 22°C in a temperature controlled incubator. Slides were either examined for pollen germination rates under a Zeiss Stemi SV11 or an Olympus Provis AX 70 microscope (Olympus, Life and Material Science Europa GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) 16 hours later. Digital images were taken of several randomly chosen areas on the slides containing pollen grains and the amount of pollen that germinated was determined with the help of the image analysis software Olympus Cell D (Olympus, Life and Material Science Europa GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).
Sample preparation for electron microscopy
Pollen grains were allowed to germinate on solidified pollen germination media containing different concentrations of GSH and BSO for 5 hours. Then they were covered with 2.5% low melting agarose and transferred in the fixative solution after the agarose was solidified (within 30 seconds). For electron microscopical analysis pollen grains were fixed in 2.5% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.06 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 10% sucrose for 45 minutes. Samples were washed in buffer 4 times 15 minutes and dehydrated in increasing concentrations of acetone (50%, 70%, and 90%) for 2 times 10 minutes for each step. Infiltration was carried out with increasing concentrations of LR-White resin (30%, 50%, and 70%) mixed with 90% acetone with a minimum of 3 hours per step. Samples were then infiltrated with 100% LR-White resin for 4 hours and embedded in fresh resin for 48 hours at 50°C. Ultrathin sections (80 nm) were cut with a Reichert Ultracut S ultramicrotome (Leica, Microsystems, Vienna, Austria).
Immunogold labeling of glutathione was conducted using ultrathin sections mounted on coated nickel grids and labeled with the Leica EM IGL automated immunogold labeling system (Leica, Microsystems, Vienna, Austria) according to Zechmann et al. and Zechmann and Müller [19, 20]. For cytohistochemical analysis, samples were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) for 20 min at room temperature. The sections were then treated with the primary antibody against glutathione (anti-glutathione rabbit polyclonal immunoglobulinG [IgG]; Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, U.S.A.) diluted 1:50 in PBS for 2 h. After short rinses in PBS (3 times 5 min) the samples were incubated with a 10 nm gold-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti rabbit IgG; British BioCell International, CardiV, UK) diluted 1:50 in PBS for 90 min. After short washes in PBS (3 times 5 min) and distilled water (2 times 5 min) labeled grids were either immediately observed in a Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope or post stained with uranyl-acetate (2% dissolved in double distilled water) for 15 s. Post staining with uranyl acetate was applied to facilitate the distinction of different cell structures enabling a clearer identification of the investigated organelles.
Quantitative analysis of immunogold labeling
Micrographs of randomly photographed immunogold labeled sections of pollen grains were digitized and gold particles were counted automatically using the software package Cell D using the particle analysis tool (Olympus, Life and Material Science Europa GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). A minimum of 20 sectioned pollen grains from two independent experiments were analyzed for gold particle density. The obtained data were recorded as the number of gold particles per μm2. For all statistical analyses the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post-hoc comparison according to Conover was used. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
bovine serum albumin
phosphate buffered saline
reactive oxygen species.
This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, P20619 and P22988 to B.Z.).
- Foyer CH, Noctor G: Redox regulation and photosynthetic organisms: Signaling, acclimation, and practical implications. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009, 11: 861-905. 10.1089/ars.2008.2177.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edwards R, Brazier-Hicks M, Dixon DP, Cummins I: Chemical manipulation of antioxidant defences in plants. Adv Bot Res. 2005, 42: 1-32. 10.1016/S0065-2296(05)42001-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeRidder BP, Goldsbrough PB: Organ-specific expression of glutathione S transferases and the efficacy of herbicide safeners in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140: 167-175. 10.1104/pp.105.067199.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zawoznik MS, Groppa MD, Tomaro ML, Benavides MP: Endogenous salicylic acid potentiates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2007, 173: 190-197. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.05.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ammar WB, Mediouni C, Tray B, Ghorbel MH, Jemal F: Glutathione and phytochelatin contents in tomato plants exposed to cadmium. Biol Plant. 2008, 52: 314-320. 10.1007/s10535-008-0065-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DalCorso G, Farinati S, Maistri S, Furini A: How plants cope with cadmium: Staking all on metabolism and gene expression. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008, 50: 1268-1280. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00737.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dučić T, Maksimović V, Radotić K: Oxalate oxidase and non-enzymatic compounds of the antioxidative system in young Serbian spruce plants exposed to cadmium stress. Arch Bio Sci, Belgrade. 60: 67-76.
- Nocito FF, Espen L, Crema B, Cocucci M, Sacchi GA: Cadmium induces acidosis in maize root cells. New Phytol. 2008, 179: 700-711. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02509.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dixon DP, Skipsey M, Grundy NM, Edwards R: Stress-induced protein S-glutathionylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138: 2233-2244. 10.1104/pp.104.058917.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hurd TR, Filipovska A, Costa NJ, Dahm CC, Murphy MP: Disulphide formation in mitochondrial protein thiols. Biochem Soci Transact. 2005, 33: 1390-1393. 10.1042/BST20051390.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hurd TR, Costa NJ, Dahm CC, Beer SM, Brown ST, Filipovska A, Murphy MP: Glutathionylation of mitochondrial proteins. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005, 7: 999-1010. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.999.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng JC, Seeley KA, Sung ZR: RML1 and RML2, Arabidopsis genes required for cell proliferation at the root tip. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107: 365-376. 10.1104/pp.107.2.365.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vernoux T, Wilson RC, Seeley KA, Reichheld JP, Muroy S, Brown S, Maughan SC, Cobbett CS, Van Montagu M, Inze D, May MJ, Sung ZR: The root meristemless/cadmium sensitive2 gene defines a glutathione-dependent pathway involved in initiation and maintenance of cell division during postembryonic root development. Plant Cell. 2000, 12: 97-110. 10.1105/tpc.12.1.97.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cairns NG, Pasternak M, Wachter A, Cobbett CS, Meyer AJ: Maturation of Arabidopsis seeds is dependent on glutathione biosynthesis within the embryo. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 446-455. 10.1104/pp.106.077982.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kranner I, Beckett RP, Wornik S, Zorn M, Pfeifhofer HW: Revival of a resurrection plant correlates with its antioxidant status. Plant J. 2002, 31: 13-24. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01329.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kranner I, Birtic S, Anderson KM, Pritchard HW: Glutathione half-cell reduction potential: A universal stress marker and modulator of programmed cell death. Free Rad Biol Med. 2006, 40: 2155-2165. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.02.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Queval G, Issakidis-Bourguet E, Hoeberichts FA, Vandorpe M, Gakiere B, Vanacker H, Miginiac-Maslow M, Van Breusegem F, Noctor G: Conditional oxidative stress responses in the Arabidopsis photorespiratory mutant cat2 demonstrate that redox state is a key modulator of daylength-dependent gene expression and define photoperiod as a crucial factor in the regulation of H2O2-induced cell death. Plant J. 2007, 52: 640-657. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03263.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wachter A, Wolf S, Steininger H, Bogs J, Rausch T: Differential targeting of GSH1 and GSH2 is achieved by multiple transcription initiation: implications for the compartmentation of glutathione biosynthesis in the Brassicaceae. Plant J. 2005, 41: 15-30. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02269.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zechmann B, Mauch F, Sticher L, Müller M: Subcellular immunocytochemical analysis detects the highest concentrations of glutathione in mitochondria and not in plastids. J Exp Bot. 2008, 59: 4017-4027. 10.1093/jxb/ern243.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zechmann B, Müller M: Subcellular compartmentation of glutathione in dicotyledonous plants. Protoplasma. 2010, 246: 15-24. 10.1007/s00709-010-0111-2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Höller K, Király L, Künstler A, Müller M, Gullner G, Fattinger M, Zechmann B: Enhanced glutathione metabolism is correlated with sulfur induced resistance in Tobacco mosaic virus-infected genetically susceptible Nicotiana tabacum plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23: 1448-1459.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Queval G, Jaillard D, Zechmann B, Noctor G: Increased intracellular H2O2availability preferentially drives glutathione accumulation in vacuoles and chloroplasts. Plant, Cell Environ.
- Borges F, Gomes G, Gardner R, Moreno N, McCormick S, Feijo JA, Becker JD: Comparative transcriptomics of Arabidopsis thaliana sperm cells. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148: 1168-1181. 10.1104/pp.108.125229.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Honys D, Twell D: Comparative analysis of the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132: 640-652. 10.1104/pp.103.020925.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wan C, Li S, Wen L, Kong J, Wang K, Zhu W: Damage of oxidative stress on mitochondria during microspores development in Honglian CMS line of rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26: 373-382. 10.1007/s00299-006-0234-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Müller M, Tausz M, Grill D: Histochemical tracing of glutathione by fluorescence microscopy and image analysis system in living plant cells. Different pathways through life-Biochemical aspects of plant biology and medicine. Edited by: Denke A, Dornisch K, Fleischmann F, Graßmann J, Heiser I, Hippeli S, Oßwald W, Schempp H. 1999, Munich: Lincom Europa, 189-197.Google Scholar
- Gullner G, Dodge AD: Accumulation of glutathione in pea leaf discs exposed to the photooxidative herbicides acifluorfen and 5-aminolevulinic acid. J Plant Physiol. 2000, 156: 111-117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyer AJ, Fricker MD: Control of demand-driven biosynthesis of glutathione in green Arabidopsis suspension culture cells. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130: 1927-1937. 10.1104/pp.008243.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hartmann T, Hönicke P, Wirtz M, Hell R, Rennenberg H, Kopriva S: Regulation of sulphate assimilation by glutathione in poplars (Populus tremula X P. alba) of wild type and overexpressing γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase in the cytosol. J Exp Bot. 2004, 55: 837-845. 10.1093/jxb/erh094.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Senda K, Ogawa K: Induction of PR-1 accumulation accompanied by runaway cell death in the lsd1 mutant of Arabidopsis is dependent on glutathione levels but independent of the redox state of glutathione. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45: 1578-1585. 10.1093/pcp/pch179.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zechmann B, Müller M, Zellnig G: Intracellular adaptations of glutathione content in Cucurbita pepo (L.) induced by reduced glutathione and buthionine sulfoximine treatment. Protoplasma. 2006, 227: 197-209. 10.1007/s00709-005-0129-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parisy V, Poinssot B, Owsianowski L, Buchala A, Glazebrook J, Mauch F: Identification of PAD2 as a c-glutamylcysteine synthetase highlights the importance of glutathione in disease resistance of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007, 49: 159-172. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02938.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Lin Y, Zhang XL, Pang DW, Zhao J: IAA stimulates pollen tube growth and mediates the modification of its wall composition and structure in Torenia fournieri. J Exp Bot. 2008, 59: 2529-2543. 10.1093/jxb/ern119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Qin Y, Zhao J: Pollen tube growth is affected by exogenous hormones and correlated with hormone changes in styles in Torenia fournieri L. Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 55: 137-148. 10.1007/s10725-008-9268-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boavida LC, McCormick S: Temperature as a determinant factor for increased and reproducible in vitro pollen germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2007, 52: 570-582. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03248.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- González-Párraga P, Marín FR, Argüelles JC, Hernández JA: Correlation between the intracellular content of glutathione and the formation of germ-tubes induced by human serum in Candida albicans. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1722: 324-330.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zellnig G, Tausz M, Pesec B, Grill D, Müller M: Effects of glutathione on thiol redox systems, chromosomal aberrations, and the ultrastructure of meristematic root cells of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Protoplasma. 2000, 212: 227-235. 10.1007/BF01282923.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Creissen G, Firmin J, Fryer M, Kular B, Leyland N, Reynolds H, Pastori G, Wellburn F, Baker N, Wellburn A, Mullineaux P: Elevated glutathione biosynthetic capacity in the chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco plants paradoxically causes increased oxidative stress. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 1277-1291. 10.1105/tpc.11.7.1277.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McInnis SM, Emery DC, Porter R, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Hiscock SJ: The role of stigma peroxidases in flowering plants: insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae). J Exp Bot. 2006, 57: 1835-1846. 10.1093/jxb/erj182.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bashandy T, Guilleminot J, Vernoux T, Caparros-Ruiz D, Ljung K, Meyer Y, Reichheld JP: Interplay between the NADP-linked thioredoxin and glutathione systems in Arabidopsis auxin signaling. Plant Cell. 2010, 22: 376-391. 10.1105/tpc.109.071225.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koprivova A, Mugford ST, Kopriva S: Arabidopsis root growth dependence on glutathione is linked to auxin transport. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29: 1157-1167. 10.1007/s00299-010-0902-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.